Paper · 2014 · Crop Research

Assessment of SWI techniques with varying nitrogen levels forimproving yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

P. K. Suryawanshi; J. B. Patel; N. M. Kumbhar

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2009-10 to study the assessment of SWI techniques with varying nitrogen levels for improving yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Effect of four spacings (S1 : 10 x 20 cm, S2 : 15 x 20 cm, S3 : 20 x 20 cm and S4 : 22.5 cm line sowing) was studied on three levels of nitrogen (N1 : 100 kg N/ha, N2 : 125 kg N/ha and N3 : 150 kg N/ha). The maximum growth, yield attributing characters, grain yield (4,204 kg/ha), straw yield (6,111 kg/ha), grain protein content, available soil nutrients after harvest and net returns (Rs. 35,373/ha) with CBR of 2.95 were obtained from 20 x 20 cm cross sowing technique. Different levels of nitrogen significantly influenced growth, yield attributing characters, yield, grain protein content and available soil nutrients after harvest. The highest grain yield (4,126 kg/ha), straw yield (6,135 kg/ha) and net returns of Rs. 33,791/ha with CBR 2.80 were recorded from 150 kg N/ha. The interaction effects of spacings and nitrogen levels were significant in respect of straw yield and protein content. Highest straw yield (6,765 kg/ha) was obtained at 20 x 20 cm spacing using 150 kg N/ha with net returns of Rs. 38,345/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross sowing at 20 x 20 cm maximized growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm cross sowing techniquee0
Outcome
growth, yield attributing characterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum growth, yield attributing characters, grain yield (4,204 kg/ha), straw yield (6,111 kg/ha), grain protein content, available soil nutrients after harvest and net returns (Rs. 35,373/ha) with CBR of 2.95 were obtained from 20 x 20 cm cross sowing technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross sowing at 20 x 20 cm gave maximum grain yield of 4,204 kg/ha.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm cross sowing techniquee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4,204 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum growth, yield attributing characters, grain yield (4,204 kg/ha), straw yield (6,111 kg/ha), grain protein content, available soil nutrients after harvest and net returns (Rs. 35,373/ha) with CBR of 2.95 were obtained from 20 x 20 cm cross sowing technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross sowing at 20 x 20 cm gave maximum straw yield of 6,111 kg/ha.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm cross sowing techniquee0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6,111 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum growth, yield attributing characters, grain yield (4,204 kg/ha), straw yield (6,111 kg/ha), grain protein content, available soil nutrients after harvest and net returns (Rs. 35,373/ha) with CBR of 2.95 were obtained from 20 x 20 cm cross sowing technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross sowing maximized grain protein and available soil nutrients.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm cross sowing techniquee0
Outcome
grain protein content, available soil nutrients after harveste0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum growth, yield attributing characters, grain yield (4,204 kg/ha), straw yield (6,111 kg/ha), grain protein content, available soil nutrients after harvest and net returns (Rs. 35,373/ha) with CBR of 2.95 were obtained from 20 x 20 cm cross sowing technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross sowing maximized net returns at Rs. 35,373/ha.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm cross sowing techniquee0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 35,373/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum growth, yield attributing characters, grain yield (4,204 kg/ha), straw yield (6,111 kg/ha), grain protein content, available soil nutrients after harvest and net returns (Rs. 35,373/ha) with CBR of 2.95 were obtained from 20 x 20 cm cross sowing technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross sowing had CBR 2.95.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm cross sowing techniquee0
Outcome
CBRe0
Value
2.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with CBR of 2.95 were obtained from 20 x 20 cm cross sowing technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels significantly affected growth, yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
Different levels of nitrogene0
Outcome
growth, yield attributing characters, yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different levels of nitrogen significantly influenced growth, yield attributing characters, yield, grain protein content and available soil nutrients after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels significantly affected grain protein and soil nutrients.

Treatment
Different levels of nitrogene0
Outcome
grain protein content and available soil nutrients after harveste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different levels of nitrogen significantly influenced growth, yield attributing characters, yield, grain protein content and available soil nutrients after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N/ha gave highest grain yield, 4,126 kg/ha.

Treatment
150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4,126 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (4,126 kg/ha), straw yield (6,135 kg/ha) and net returns of Rs. 33,791/ha with CBR 2.80 were recorded from 150 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N/ha gave straw yield of 6,135 kg/ha.

Treatment
150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6,135 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (4,126 kg/ha), straw yield (6,135 kg/ha) and net returns of Rs. 33,791/ha with CBR 2.80 were recorded from 150 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N/ha gave net returns of Rs. 33,791/ha.

Treatment
150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 33,791/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (4,126 kg/ha), straw yield (6,135 kg/ha) and net returns of Rs. 33,791/ha with CBR 2.80 were recorded from 150 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N/ha had CBR 2.80.

Treatment
150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
CBRe0
Value
2.80e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with CBR 2.80 were recorded from 150 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing and nitrogen interacted significantly for straw yield and protein content.

Treatment
spacings and nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
straw yield and protein contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effects of spacings and nitrogen levels were significant in respect of straw yield and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 x 20 cm with 150 kg N/ha gave highest straw yield of 6,765 kg/ha.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm spacing using 150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
6,765 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest straw yield (6,765 kg/ha) was obtained at 20 x 20 cm spacing using 150 kg N/ha with net returns of Rs. 38,345/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 x 20 cm with 150 kg N/ha returned Rs. 38,345/ha.

Treatment
20 x 20 cm spacing using 150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
Rs. 38,345/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20 x 20 cm spacing using 150 kg N/ha with net returns of Rs. 38,345/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.