Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Morphological characteristics, dry matter production, and nutritional value of winter forage and grains under grazing and split nitrogen fertilization

Taffarel, Loreno Egidio; Oliveira, Paulo Sérgio Rabello de; Oliveira, Euclides Reuter de; et al.

19
claims
44
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Morphological characteristics, dry matter production, and nutritional values of winter forage and grains were evaluated. This study was conducted from April 24, 2012 to November 7, 2013 in the Western Paraná State University (UNIOESTE), Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil. Pastures under one grazing and non-grazing conditions were evaluated under 120 kg N ha-1 fertilization split into two 60 kg N ha-1 treatments. Two pastures received 40 kg N ha-1 three times. IPR 126 oat, BRS Tarumã wheat, and IPR 111 triticale were the test crops. Topdressing with 40 or 60 kg N ha-1 did not change morphological characteristics until 60 d after sowing. Pastures under non-grazing that received 120 kg N ha-1 treatments were taller than the controls, whereas those under grazing that received 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 presented with higher leaf production than did the controls. Total average dry matter (DM) production in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 5,275 kg ha-1 and 6,270 kg ha-1 for oat, 3,166 kg ha-1 and 7,423 kg ha-1 for wheat, and 4,552 kg ha-1 and 7,603 kg ha-1 for triticale. Split N fertilization did not cause differences in the levels of crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) in the forage. Nevertheless, increases in in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) were observed in oat and wheat receiving 60 kg N ha-1 during the first graze. IVDMD did not change in oat, wheat, and triticale forages receiving 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 during the second graze. Grazing did not affect the nutritional values of wheat and triticale grains, but reduced those of oat. Therefore, the results of the present study suggest that grazing lengthens the crop cycles, and so allow the staggered sowing of summer crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing with 40 or 60 kg N ha-1 did not change morphological characteristics until 60 days after sowing.

Taxon
winter foraget0
Treatment
Topdressing with 40 or 60 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
morphological characteristicse1
Direction
did not changee1
Qualifier
until 60 d after sowinge1
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“winter forage and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Topdressing with 40 or 60 kg N ha-1 did not change morphological characteristics until 60 d after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-grazed pastures receiving 120 kg N ha-1 were taller than the controls.

Taxon
winter foraget0
Treatment
120 kg N ha-1e3
Outcome
Morphological characteristicse0
Direction
tallere3
Qualifier
under non-grazinge3
Comparator
controlse3
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Verbatim

t0

“winter forage and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Morphological characteristics, dry matter production, and nutritional values of winter forage and grains were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pastures under non-grazing that received 120 kg N ha-1 treatments were taller than the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–736 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazed pastures receiving 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 had higher leaf production than the controls.

Taxon
winter foraget0
Treatment
80 or 120 kg N ha-1e4
Outcome
leaf productione4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
under grazinge4
Comparator
controlse4
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Verbatim

t0

“winter forage and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas those under grazing that received 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 presented with higher leaf production than did the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–859 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat total average dry matter production was 5,275 kg ha-1 in 2012.

Outcome
Total average dry matter (DM) productione5
Value
5,275 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
2012e5
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Total average dry matter (DM) production in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 5,275 kg ha-1 and 6,270 kg ha-1 for oat, 3,166 kg ha-1 and 7,423 kg ha-1 for wheat, and 4,552 kg ha-1 and 7,603 kg ha-1 for triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat total average dry matter production was 6,270 kg ha-1 in 2013.

Outcome
Total average dry matter (DM) productione5
Value
6,270 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
2013e5
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Total average dry matter (DM) production in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 5,275 kg ha-1 and 6,270 kg ha-1 for oat, 3,166 kg ha-1 and 7,423 kg ha-1 for wheat, and 4,552 kg ha-1 and 7,603 kg ha-1 for triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat total average dry matter production was 3,166 kg ha-1 in 2012.

Outcome
Total average dry matter (DM) productione5
Value
3,166 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
2012e5
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Total average dry matter (DM) production in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 5,275 kg ha-1 and 6,270 kg ha-1 for oat, 3,166 kg ha-1 and 7,423 kg ha-1 for wheat, and 4,552 kg ha-1 and 7,603 kg ha-1 for triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat total average dry matter production was 7,423 kg ha-1 in 2013.

Outcome
Total average dry matter (DM) productione5
Value
7,423 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
2013e5
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Total average dry matter (DM) production in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 5,275 kg ha-1 and 6,270 kg ha-1 for oat, 3,166 kg ha-1 and 7,423 kg ha-1 for wheat, and 4,552 kg ha-1 and 7,603 kg ha-1 for triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale total average dry matter production was 4,552 kg ha-1 in 2012.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee5
Outcome
Total average dry matter (DM) productione5
Value
4,552 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
2012e5
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Total average dry matter (DM) production in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 5,275 kg ha-1 and 6,270 kg ha-1 for oat, 3,166 kg ha-1 and 7,423 kg ha-1 for wheat, and 4,552 kg ha-1 and 7,603 kg ha-1 for triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale total average dry matter production was 7,603 kg ha-1 in 2013.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee5
Outcome
Total average dry matter (DM) productione5
Value
7,603 kg ha-1e5
Qualifier
2013e5
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Total average dry matter (DM) production in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 5,275 kg ha-1 and 6,270 kg ha-1 for oat, 3,166 kg ha-1 and 7,423 kg ha-1 for wheat, and 4,552 kg ha-1 and 7,603 kg ha-1 for triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen fertilization did not change crude protein, neutral detergent fiber or acid detergent fiber in the forage.

Taxon
winter foraget0
Treatment
Split N fertilizatione6
Outcome
crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)e6
Direction
did not cause differencese6
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“winter forage and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–103 · show in text ↑
e6

“Split N fertilization did not cause differences in the levels of crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) in the forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1233 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat in vitro dry matter digestibility increased with 60 kg N ha-1 during the first graze.

Treatment
60 kg N ha-1e7
Outcome
in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD)e7
Direction
increasese7
Qualifier
during the first grazee7
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Nevertheless, increases in in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) were observed in oat and wheat receiving 60 kg N ha-1 during the first graze”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1380 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat in vitro dry matter digestibility increased with 60 kg N ha-1 during the first graze.

Treatment
60 kg N ha-1e7
Outcome
in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD)e7
Direction
increasese7
Qualifier
during the first grazee7
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Nevertheless, increases in in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) were observed in oat and wheat receiving 60 kg N ha-1 during the first graze”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1380 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat IVDMD did not change with 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 during the second graze.

Treatment
80 or 120 kg N ha-1e6
Outcome
IVDMDe6
Direction
did not changee6
Qualifier
during the second grazee6
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“IVDMD did not change in oat, wheat, and triticale forages receiving 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 during the second graze”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat IVDMD did not change with 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 during the second graze.

Treatment
80 or 120 kg N ha-1e6
Outcome
IVDMDe6
Direction
did not changee6
Qualifier
during the second grazee6
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“IVDMD did not change in oat, wheat, and triticale forages receiving 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 during the second graze”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale IVDMD did not change with 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 during the second graze.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee6
Treatment
80 or 120 kg N ha-1e6
Outcome
IVDMDe6
Direction
did not changee6
Qualifier
during the second grazee6
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“IVDMD did not change in oat, wheat, and triticale forages receiving 80 or 120 kg N ha-1 during the second graze”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing did not affect the nutritional values of wheat grains.

Organ / stage
grainse7
Treatment
Grazinge7
Outcome
nutritional valuese7
Direction
did not affecte7
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Grazing did not affect the nutritional values of wheat and triticale grains, but reduced those of oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1596 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing did not affect the nutritional values of triticale grains.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee7
Organ / stage
grainse7
Treatment
Grazinge7
Outcome
nutritional valuese7
Direction
did not affecte7
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Grazing did not affect the nutritional values of wheat and triticale grains, but reduced those of oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1596 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing reduced the nutritional values of oat grains.

Organ / stage
grainse7
Treatment
Grazinge7
Outcome
nutritional valuese7
Direction
reducede7
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Grazing did not affect the nutritional values of wheat and triticale grains, but reduced those of oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1596 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing lengthens the crop cycles of winter forage, which the authors suggest allows staggered sowing of summer crops.

Taxon
winter foraget0
Treatment
grazinge0
Outcome
crop cyclese0
Direction
lengthense0
Setting
Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazile2

Verbatim

t0

“winter forage and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“the results of the present study suggest that grazing lengthens the crop cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1688 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–268 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 70 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased common wheat test weight by 1.4%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.