Paper · 2013 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Mitigation effects of non-enzymatic antioxidants in maize (Zea mays L.) plants under salinity stress

Atilla Levant Tuna; Cengiz Kaya; Hakan Altunlu; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of non-enzymatic antioxidative compounds such as ascorbic acid, thiamine HCl and beta-carotene were investigated on salt stressed maize plants. The maize plants were sprayed with 100 mg L−1 of ascorbic acid, thiamine or beta-carotene solutions once a week, up to harvesting of plants. The treatment of NaCl was initiated 25 days after sowing by irrigating the plants with 125 mM NaCl solution. Plants for physiological and biochemical measurements were harvested at the cob formation stage and for yield 90 days after seedling emergence. The results showed that although salt stress reduced the shoot and root dry weights and macro-element contents of maize plants, exogenous application of non-enzymatic antioxidants improved the above-mentioned parameters of maize plants under saline conditions. Shoot and root dry weights increased significantly (P < 0.05) by the ascorbic acid treatments. Salt stress enhanced the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC: 1.15.1.1), peroxidase (POX; EC: 1.11.1.7) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO; EC: 1.10.3.1). Proline content also increased significantly in maize plants in response to NaCl stress. Although the SOD activity increased significantly with ascorbic acid treatment, the POX activity increased considerably with beta-carotene application. Of the non-enzymatic antioxidative compounds tested, ascorbic acid was more effective than the others in protecting maize plants from salinity stress. The results of the present study indicate that foliar application of non-enzymatic antioxidative compounds alleviated the detrimental effects of salinity and increased resistance to salinity in the maize plants by improving the antioxidative defense system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced shoot and root dry weights.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weightse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt stress reduced the shoot and root dry weights and macro-element contents of maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced macro-element contents.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
macro-element contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt stress reduced the shoot and root dry weights and macro-element contents of maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant applications improved dry weights and macro-element contents under saline conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
exogenous application of non-enzymatic antioxidantse0
Outcome
above-mentioned parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenous application of non-enzymatic antioxidants improved the above-mentioned parameters of maize plants under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid significantly increased shoot and root dry weights.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ascorbic acid treatmentse0
Outcome
Shoot and root dry weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
P < 0.05e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shoot and root dry weights increased significantly (P < 0.05) by the ascorbic acid treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress enhanced superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC: 1.15.1.1), peroxidase (POX; EC: 1.11.1.7) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO; EC: 1.10.3.1)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salt stress enhanced the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC: 1.15.1.1), peroxidase (POX; EC: 1.11.1.7) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO; EC: 1.10.3.1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl stress significantly increased proline content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NaCl stresse0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content also increased significantly in maize plants in response to NaCl stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid significantly increased SOD activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ascorbic acid treatmente0
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“the SOD activity increased significantly with ascorbic acid treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beta-carotene considerably increased POX activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
beta-carotene applicatione0
Outcome
POX activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“the POX activity increased considerably with beta-carotene application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid protected maize from salinity stress more effectively than the other antioxidants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ascorbic acide0
Outcome
protecting maize plants from salinity stresse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid was more effective than the others in protecting maize plants from salinity stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1453 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded foliar antioxidants alleviated salinity harm and increased resistance through improved antioxidative defense.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
foliar application of non-enzymatic antioxidative compoundse0
Outcome
resistance to salinitye0
Qualifier
improving the antioxidative defense systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of non-enzymatic antioxidative compounds alleviated the detrimental effects of salinity and increased resistance to salinity in the maize plants by improving the antioxidative defense system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1711 · show in text ↑

ascorbic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ascorbic acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salinity · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 26 positive, 231 negative or no effect

230 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.