Paper · 2017 · Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology

Actinobacteria of Arid and Semi-arid Soils: Antagonism to Fungal Pathogens and Plant Growth Promoting Potential

TK Radha; DLN Rao; KR Sreeramulu

13
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biological control of plant pathogens is assuming increasing importance in organic and low input sustainable agriculture. Forty one Actinobacterial strains isolated from the arid, semi arid and humid regions of Rajasthan, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh in India were tested for their antagonism to four plant pathogenic fungi viz., Macrophomina phaseolina, Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum. The Streptomyces strains from humid regions were more effective in inhibiting mycelial growth of Macrophomina phaseolina (62.8%). Arid and semi arid region strains (40.8 and 40.6%) were almost similar in inhibiting mycelial growth of Sclerotium rolfsii compared to humid region strains. Semi arid region strains (24.2%) were more effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solani followed by arid and humid region strains. However only the arid region strains (44.5%) showed inhibition towards Fusarium oxysporum. The strains with best antogonistic ability (10 no.s) also exhibited other plant growth promoting traits like production of Indole acetic acid (1.9 - 5.7 mg ml-1) and Gibberellic acid (24.1-41.4 mg ml-1). All the strains except Streptomyces A30 could solubilize P from inorganic tri-calcium phosphate. The amount of P solubilization ranged from 3.2 - 6.8%. All the strains except Streptomyces A40 produced alkaline phosphatase which ranged from 60.0-160.9 µg p-nitrophenol/ml /h. Some strains produced ammonia whereas none of the strains produced HCN, siderophore or exhibited chitinase activity. In a glass house evaluation in soil microcosms, among the ten strains Streptomyces A6 was found best for promoting maize and Streptomyces A17 for chickpea growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces strains from humid regions inhibited Macrophomina phaseolina mycelial growth by 62.8%.

Treatment
Streptomyces strains from humid regionse1
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Second interactor
StreptomycesStreptomycese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibiting mycelial growth of Macrophomina phaseolinae1
Value
62.8%e1

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces
Streptomyces · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Streptomyces strains from humid regions were more effective in inhibiting mycelial growth of Macrophomina phaseolina (62.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–543 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arid and semi-arid region strains inhibited Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth by 40.8%, almost similar to humid region strains.

Treatment
Arid and semi arid region strainse2
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie2pathogen
Outcome
inhibiting mycelial growth of Sclerotium rolfsiie2
Value
40.8e2
Qualifier
almost similare2

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Arid and semi arid region strains (40.8 and 40.6%) were almost similar in inhibiting mycelial growth of Sclerotium rolfsii compared to humid region strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–700 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arid and semi-arid region strains inhibited Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth by 40.6%, almost similar to humid region strains.

Treatment
Arid and semi arid region strainse2
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie2pathogen
Outcome
inhibiting mycelial growth of Sclerotium rolfsiie2
Value
40.6%e2
Qualifier
almost similare2

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Arid and semi arid region strains (40.8 and 40.6%) were almost similar in inhibiting mycelial growth of Sclerotium rolfsii compared to humid region strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–700 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semi-arid region strains inhibited Rhizoctonia solani mycelial growth by 24.2%, more effective than arid and humid region strains.

Treatment
Semi arid region strainse3
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie3pathogen
Outcome
inhibiting the mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solanie3
Direction
more effectivee3
Value
24.2%e3

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Semi arid region strains (24.2%) were more effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solani followed by arid and humid region strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arid region strains showed inhibition towards Fusarium oxysporum of 44.5%.

Treatment
arid region strainse4
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume4pathogen
Outcome
inhibition towards Fusarium oxysporume4
Value
44.5%e4

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“only the arid region strains (44.5%) showed inhibition towards Fusarium oxysporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best antagonistic strains produced indole acetic acid at 1.9 to 5.7 mg ml-1.

Outcome
Indole acetic acide5
Value
1.9 - 5.7 mg ml-1e5

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e5

“production of Indole acetic acid (1.9 - 5.7 mg ml-1) and Gibberellic acid (24.1-41.4 mg ml-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best antagonistic strains produced gibberellic acid at 24.1 to 41.4 mg ml-1.

Outcome
Gibberellic acide5
Value
24.1-41.4 mg ml-1e5

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e5

“production of Indole acetic acid (1.9 - 5.7 mg ml-1) and Gibberellic acid (24.1-41.4 mg ml-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All strains except Streptomyces A30 solubilized P from tri-calcium phosphate by 3.2 to 6.8%.

Outcome
P solubilizatione6
Value
3.2 - 6.8%e6

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All the strains except Streptomyces A30 could solubilize P from inorganic tri-calcium phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1244 · show in text ↑
e6

“The amount of P solubilization ranged from 3.2 - 6.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All strains except Streptomyces A40 produced alkaline phosphatase at 60.0 to 160.9 µg p-nitrophenol/ml/h.

Outcome
alkaline phosphatasee7
Value
60.0-160.9 µg p-nitrophenol/ml /he7

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e7

“produced alkaline phosphatase which ranged from 60.0-160.9 µg p-nitrophenol/ml /h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some strains produced ammonia.

Outcome
produced ammoniae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Some strains produced ammonia whereas none of the strains produced HCN, siderophore or exhibited chitinase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the strains produced HCN or siderophore or showed chitinase activity.

Outcome
HCN, siderophore or exhibited chitinase activitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Some strains produced ammonia whereas none of the strains produced HCN, siderophore or exhibited chitinase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a glasshouse evaluation in soil microcosms, Streptomyces A6 was found best for promoting maize among the ten strains.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Streptomyces A6e1
Interactor
Streptomyces A6e1symbiont
Outcome
promoting maizee1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
the ten strainse1
Setting
glass house evaluation in soil microcosmse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a glass house evaluation in soil microcosms, among the ten strains Streptomyces A6 was found best for promoting maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a glasshouse evaluation in soil microcosms, Streptomyces A17 was found best for chickpea growth among the ten strains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
Streptomyces A17e2
Interactor
Streptomyces A17e2symbiont
Outcome
chickpea growthe2
Direction
beste1
Comparator
the ten strainse1
Setting
glass house evaluation in soil microcosmse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a glass house evaluation in soil microcosms, among the ten strains Streptomyces A6 was found best for promoting maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1661 · show in text ↑
e2

“Streptomyces A17 for chickpea growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1702 · show in text ↑

Streptomyces · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.