Paper · 1993 · HortScience

EFFECTS OF COMBINING POSTHARVEST CALCIUM AND HEAT TREATMENT ON REDUCING DECAY AND MAINTAINING QUALITY IN APPLES

William S Conway; Carl E. Sams; Chien Yi Wang; et al.

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Heat treatment of `Golden Delicious' apples ( Malus domestica Borkh) at 38C for 4 days, pressure infiltration with 2 or 4% solutions of CaCl 2 , or a combination of both with heat following CaCl 2 treatment affected both decay and firmness during 6 months storage at 0C. The heat treatment alone reduced decay caused by B . cinerea by about 30%, while heat in combination with a 2% CaCl 2 solution reduced decay by about 60%. CaCl 2 solutions of 2 or 4% alone reduced decay by 40% and 60%, respectively. Heat treatments, either alone or in combination with CaCl 2 treatments, best maintained firmness (80 N), followed by fruit infiltrated with 2 or 4% solutions of CaCl 2 alone (70 N) and then the nontreated controls (66 N). Instron Magness-Taylor and Instron Compression Test curves show that heat treated fruit differed qualitatively and quantitatively from nonheated fruit. A combination of heat treatment after CaCl 2 infiltration increased surface injury over those fruit heated or infiltrated with CaCl 2 solutions alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat alone reduced B. cinerea decay by about 30%.

Treatment
heat treatment alonee0
Interactor
B . cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
decay caused by B . cinereae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 30%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The heat treatment alone reduced decay caused by B . cinerea by about 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat with 2% CaCl 2 reduced decay by about 60%.

Treatment
heat in combination with a 2% CaCl 2 solutione0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 60%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“heat in combination with a 2% CaCl 2 solution reduced decay by about 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% CaCl 2 alone reduced decay by 40%.

Treatment
CaCl 2 solutions of 2 or 4% alonee0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl 2 solutions of 2 or 4% alone reduced decay by 40% and 60%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

4% CaCl 2 alone reduced decay by 60%.

Treatment
CaCl 2 solutions of 2 or 4% alonee0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl 2 solutions of 2 or 4% alone reduced decay by 40% and 60%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat alone or with calcium best maintained firmness at 80 N.

Treatment
Heat treatmentse0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
best maintainede0
Value
80 Ne0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Heat treatments, either alone or in combination with CaCl 2 treatments, best maintained firmness (80 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium alone maintained firmness at 70 N, compared with 66 N in controls.

Treatment
2 or 4% solutions of CaCl 2 alonee0
Outcome
firmnesse1
Value
70 Ne0
Qualifier
66 Ne0
Comparator
nontreated controlse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fruit infiltrated with 2 or 4% solutions of CaCl 2 alone (70 N) and then the nontreated controls (66 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–724 · show in text ↑
e1

“best maintained firmness (80 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Instron test curves distinguished heated from nonheated fruit qualitatively and quantitatively.

Outcome
heat treated fruit differed qualitatively and quantitatively from nonheated fruite0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Instron Magness-Taylor and Instron Compression Test curves show that heat treated fruit differed qualitatively and quantitatively from nonheated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat after calcium infiltration increased surface injury compared with either treatment alone.

Treatment
heat treatment after CaCl 2 infiltratione0
Outcome
surface injurye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
those fruit heated or infiltrated with CaCl 2 solutions alonee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of heat treatment after CaCl 2 infiltration increased surface injury over those fruit heated or infiltrated with CaCl 2 solutions alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1027 · show in text ↑