Abstract
Four different tillage systems were compared in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production on one experimental field (chernosem) located in Baranya region, northeastern Croatia in the 2002 and 2003. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plant grown with no-tillage (NT) often appears smaller than those grown with conventional tillage (CT) and they produce lower grain yield. A 2-yr average yield of soybean was significant lower under NT than under CT, SL and DH treatments. The soybean oil and protein content was very similar under all tillage systems in the 2-yr average. Soybean crude fiber (%) was affected by the main effect of tillage. In average across the 2-yr crude fiber (%) of soybean grain was greater under NT than CT, DH and SL treatments. The increase in soybean grain Ash (%) indicates that of soybean plants growing with SL and NT conditions were thicker than the of soybean plants growing with CT and DH conditions for most of the season. The dry conditions experienced in 2003 were expected to have exacerbated any negative effects on number of stem soybean.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage soybean plants often appeared smaller than conventionally tilled plants.
- Taxon
- Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- no-tillage (NT)e0
- Outcome
- smallere0
- Direction
- smallere0
- Comparator
- conventional tillage (CT)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plant grown with no-tillage (NT) often appears smaller than those grown with conventional tillage (CT)”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage produced lower soybean grain yield than conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they produce lower grain yield”
t0“SOYBEAN [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ]”
Claim · model-written summary
Two-year mean soybean yield was significantly lower under NT than under CT, SL and DH.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- NTe0
- Outcome
- average yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- CT, SL and DH treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A 2-yr average yield of soybean was significant lower under NT than under CT, SL and DH treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean oil and protein content was similar across tillage systems.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Outcome
- oil and protein contente0
- Direction
- very similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The soybean oil and protein content was very similar under all tillage systems in the 2-yr average.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage affected soybean grain crude fiber percentage.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- tillagee0
- Outcome
- crude fiber (%)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean crude fiber (%) was affected by the main effect of tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
NT had greater soybean grain crude fiber percentage than CT, DH and SL.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- NTe0
- Outcome
- crude fiber (%)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- CT, DH and SL treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“crude fiber (%) of soybean grain was greater under NT than CT, DH and SL treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean grain ash percentage increased under SL and NT conditions.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- SL and NT conditionse0
- Outcome
- grain Ash (%)e0
- Direction
- increasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in soybean grain Ash (%) indicates that of soybean plants growing with SL and NT conditions were thicker than the of soybean plants growing with CT and DH conditions for most of the season.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean plants under SL and NT were thicker than those under CT and DH for most of the season.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- SL and NT conditionse0
- Outcome
- thickere0
- Direction
- thickere0
- Comparator
- CT and DH conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soybean plants growing with SL and NT conditions were thicker than the of soybean plants growing with CT and DH conditions for most of the season.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.