Paper · 2017 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Evaluation of growth, yield attributing characters, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in integrated weed management practice under the temperate conditions of Kashmir

RAYEES A. SHAH

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted under the temperate conditions of Kashmir during Rabi season 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study the effect of integrated weed management on growth, yield attributing characters, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The results revealed significant increase in grain yield and growth characters, like crop emergence/mm row length, No. of tillers / m row length at 60 DAS and plant height (cm) at 60 DAS with isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowing during both the years. Among the weed control measures isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowing recorded higher grains/ear, 1000 grain weight (g), highest grain yield ( 4.22 tonnes/ha) as well as straw yield (6.10 tonnes/ha) which was at par with the weed free but; isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days after gives significantly highest net returns Rs. 817.7 and Rs. 919.7 during 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively. The higher net returns under isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing was due to lower cost of herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus hand weeding significantly increased grain yield and growth characters in both years.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowinge0
Outcome
grain yield and growth characterse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in grain yield and growth characters, like crop emergence/mm row length, No. of tillers / m row length at 60 DAS and plant height (cm) at 60 DAS with isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowing during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus hand weeding produced higher grains per ear and thousand-grain weight.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowinge0
Outcome
grains/ear, 1000 grain weight (g)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowing recorded higher grains/ear, 1000 grain weight (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus hand weeding produced the highest grain yield of 4.22 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowinge1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.22 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
weed freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield ( 4.22 tonnes/ha) as well as straw yield (6.10 tonnes/ha) which was at par with the weed free”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the weed control measures isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus hand weeding produced 6.10 tonnes/ha straw yield, at par with weed free plots.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowinge1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Value
6.10 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
weed freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield ( 4.22 tonnes/ha) as well as straw yield (6.10 tonnes/ha) which was at par with the weed free”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the weed control measures isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing + hand weeding at 30 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon and 2, 4-D tank mix produced the highest net returns of Rs. 817.7 in 2011-12.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days aftere0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 817.7e0
Qualifier
2011-12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days after gives significantly highest net returns Rs. 817.7 and Rs. 919.7 during 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon and 2, 4-D tank mix produced the highest net returns of Rs. 919.7 in 2012-13.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days aftere0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 919.7e0
Qualifier
2012-13e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days after gives significantly highest net returns Rs. 817.7 and Rs. 919.7 during 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute higher tank-mix net returns to lower herbicide cost.

Treatment
isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowinge0
Outcome
higher net returnse0
Qualifier
lower cost of herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher net returns under isoproturon @ 1 kg a. i /ha tank mix with 2, 4-D @ 0.5kg a. i /ha at 32 days after sowing was due to lower cost of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.