Paper · 2017 · Research on Crops

Yield maximization through resource conservation technologies under maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols of Tunga Bhadra Command Project Area of Karnataka

M. A. Basavanneppa; Ashok Kumar Gaddi; B. M. Chittapur; et al.

17
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to study the effect of tillage, crop residue and fertilizer management on maize-chickpea cropping system from 2007–08 to 2013–14 at Agricultural Research Station, Siruguppa, Karnataka, India. The experiment was conducted in deep black soil with split-split plot design and treatments were replicated thrice. The experiment included 24 treatment combinations of four tillage practices viz., Conventional tillage (M1), Reduced tillage (M2), Zero tillage (M3) and Bed planting (M4) were assigned to main plots, three crop residue managements viz., Burning (S1), Retention (S2) and Retrieval (S3) were to sub-plots and three fertilizer managements viz., T1: Recommended N, P2O5K2O (150: 75: 37.5 kg/ha for maize and 25: 50: 00 kg/ha for chickpea), T2: T1+25% RDN and T3: T2+micronutrients (S-50 kg/ha and ZnSO4-20 kg/ha) for sub-sub plots. The hybrid maize (NK 6240) was sown in the first fortnight of July and after harvest of the maize crop, chickpea (JG 11) was sown during the fourth week of November or first week of December in each year. The pooled yield of maize and chickpea over six years was significantly influenced by tillage and fertilizer management practices. Among the different practices, the higher maize and chickpea grain yield of 6434 and 1236 kg/ha was recorded in bed planting in tillage practices and 6388 and 1192 kg/ha in 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application in fertilizer management practices, respectively, when compared to other management practices. Similarly, the significantly higher pooled total maize equivalent yield (TMEY, 8887 kg/ha) and system productivity (24.4 kg/ha/day) were recorded with bed planting compared to other tillage practices and it was at par with conventional tillage. Retrieval method of residue management practice recorded significantly superior TMEY (8590 kg/ha) and system productivity (23.5 kg/ha/day) compared to retention of residue on land. Application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 produced significantly higher TMEY (8779 kg/ha) and system productivity (24.1 kg/ha/day) as compared to application of 100% RDF. Similar trend in N and K uptake by the system was noticed in bed planting (178 and 144 kg/ha/year), retrieval (173 and 141 kg/ha/year) and application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 (177 and 145 kg/ha/year).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled yield of maize and chickpea over six years was significantly influenced by tillage and fertilizer management practices.

Taxon
maize and chickpeaCicer arietinumZea mayse0
Treatment
tillage and fertilizer management practicese0
Outcome
pooled yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pooled yield of maize and chickpea over six years was significantly influenced by tillage and fertilizer management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was higher with bed planting (6434 kg/ha) than other management practices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
bed planting in tillage practicese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6434e0
Comparator
other management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher maize and chickpea grain yield of 6434 and 1236 kg/ha was recorded in bed planting in tillage practices and 6388 and 1192 kg/ha in 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application in fertilizer management practices, respectively, when compared to other management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea grain yield was higher with bed planting (1236 kg/ha) than other management practices.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
bed planting in tillage practicese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1236 kg/hae0
Comparator
other management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher maize and chickpea grain yield of 6434 and 1236 kg/ha was recorded in bed planting in tillage practices and 6388 and 1192 kg/ha in 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application in fertilizer management practices, respectively, when compared to other management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was higher with 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application (6388 kg/ha) than other management practices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application in fertilizer management practicese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6388e0
Comparator
other management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher maize and chickpea grain yield of 6434 and 1236 kg/ha was recorded in bed planting in tillage practices and 6388 and 1192 kg/ha in 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application in fertilizer management practices, respectively, when compared to other management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea grain yield was higher with 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application (1192 kg/ha) than other management practices.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application in fertilizer management practicese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1192 kg/hae0
Comparator
other management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher maize and chickpea grain yield of 6434 and 1236 kg/ha was recorded in bed planting in tillage practices and 6388 and 1192 kg/ha in 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 application in fertilizer management practices, respectively, when compared to other management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled total maize equivalent yield was significantly higher with bed planting (8887 kg/ha) than other tillage practices, at par with conventional tillage.

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
total maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8887 kg/hae0
Qualifier
at par with conventional tillagee0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0
Setting
vertisolst0

Verbatim

e0

“the significantly higher pooled total maize equivalent yield (TMEY, 8887 kg/ha) and system productivity (24.4 kg/ha/day) were recorded with bed planting compared to other tillage practices and it was at par with conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1755 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

System productivity was significantly higher with bed planting (24.4 kg/ha/day) than other tillage practices.

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
24.4 kg/ha/daye0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0
Setting
vertisolst0

Verbatim

e0

“the significantly higher pooled total maize equivalent yield (TMEY, 8887 kg/ha) and system productivity (24.4 kg/ha/day) were recorded with bed planting compared to other tillage practices and it was at par with conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1755 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue retrieval gave significantly superior TMEY (8590 kg/ha) compared with residue retention.

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
Retrieval method of residue management practicee0
Outcome
TMEYe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
8590 kg/hae0
Comparator
retention of residue on lande0
Setting
vertisolst0

Verbatim

e0

“Retrieval method of residue management practice recorded significantly superior TMEY (8590 kg/ha) and system productivity (23.5 kg/ha/day) compared to retention of residue on land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue retrieval gave significantly superior system productivity (23.5 kg/ha/day) compared with residue retention.

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
Retrieval method of residue management practicee0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
superiore0
Value
23.5 kg/ha/daye0
Comparator
retention of residue on lande0
Setting
vertisolst0

Verbatim

e0

“Retrieval method of residue management practice recorded significantly superior TMEY (8590 kg/ha) and system productivity (23.5 kg/ha/day) compared to retention of residue on land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 gave significantly higher TMEY (8779 kg/ha) than 100% RDF.

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4e0
Outcome
TMEYe0
Direction
highere0
Value
8779 kg/hae0
Comparator
100% RDFe0
Setting
vertisolst0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 produced significantly higher TMEY (8779 kg/ha) and system productivity (24.1 kg/ha/day) as compared to application of 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–2105 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 gave significantly higher system productivity (24.1 kg/ha/day) than 100% RDF.

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4e0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
24.1 kg/ha/daye0
Comparator
100% RDFe0
Setting
vertisolst0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 produced significantly higher TMEY (8779 kg/ha) and system productivity (24.1 kg/ha/day) as compared to application of 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–2105 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake by the system under bed planting was 178 kg/ha/year (similar higher trend).

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
N and K uptake by the systeme0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
178e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend in N and K uptake by the system was noticed in bed planting (178 and 144 kg/ha/year), retrieval (173 and 141 kg/ha/year) and application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 (177 and 145 kg/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K uptake by the system under bed planting was 144 kg/ha/year (similar higher trend).

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
N and K uptake by the systeme0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
144 kg/ha/yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend in N and K uptake by the system was noticed in bed planting (178 and 144 kg/ha/year), retrieval (173 and 141 kg/ha/year) and application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 (177 and 145 kg/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake by the system under residue retrieval was 173 kg/ha/year (similar higher trend).

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
retrievale0
Outcome
N and K uptake by the systeme0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
173e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend in N and K uptake by the system was noticed in bed planting (178 and 144 kg/ha/year), retrieval (173 and 141 kg/ha/year) and application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 (177 and 145 kg/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K uptake by the system under residue retrieval was 141 kg/ha/year (similar higher trend).

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
retrievale0
Outcome
N and K uptake by the systeme0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
141 kg/ha/yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend in N and K uptake by the system was noticed in bed planting (178 and 144 kg/ha/year), retrieval (173 and 141 kg/ha/year) and application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 (177 and 145 kg/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake by the system under 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 was 177 kg/ha/year (similar higher trend).

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4e0
Outcome
N and K uptake by the systeme0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
177e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend in N and K uptake by the system was noticed in bed planting (178 and 144 kg/ha/year), retrieval (173 and 141 kg/ha/year) and application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 (177 and 145 kg/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K uptake by the system under 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 was 145 kg/ha/year (similar higher trend).

Taxon
maize-chickpea cropping systemt0
Treatment
100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4e0
Outcome
N and K uptake by the systeme0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
145 kg/ha/yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend in N and K uptake by the system was noticed in bed planting (178 and 144 kg/ha/year), retrieval (173 and 141 kg/ha/year) and application of 100% RDF+25% RDN+S+ZnSO4 (177 and 145 kg/ha/year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-chickpea cropping system in vertisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–111 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 110 positive, 45 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.