Paper · 2017 · Agrotechnology

Effects of Water Saving Practices on Winter Wheat and Summer Maize Yields in South Loess Plateau of Northwest China

Ahmadzai MA; Cai M; Meng Y; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment, laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with split plot arrangement having four replications, was conducted at the south edge of Loess Plateau, Shaanxi, China to evaluate the responses of winter wheat and summer maize to different water saving management practices involving four mulching and irrigation treatments, i.e., plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigation (RF+DI), straw mulch combined with deficit irrigation (SM+DI), Deficit Irrigation (DI), and Conventional Flood Irrigation (CFI). Soil temperature and moisture during the crop growth were monitored in two years. RF+DI treatment significantly increased maize yield, and it also had higher wheat yield than SM+DI treatment. SM+DI treatment increased maize yield; however, it did not increase winter wheat yield. Soil water content in RF+DI and SM+DI treatments was significantly higher than those of CFI or DI treatments. Compared with RF+DI treatment, SM+DI treatment had higher soil water content (0-20 cm); however, it had the lowest heat 741 Degree Days of Soil (DDs) among the four treatments. The low soil temperature in SM+DI plots, especially in early spring, delayed winter wheat growth stages and development, thus reduced grain yield compared with RF+DI treatment. The positive effects of ridge-furrow system on both wheat and maize yield could be explained by harmonizing soil moisture and temperature by this treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF+DI significantly increased maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
south edge of Loess Plateau, Shaanxi, Chinae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RF+DI treatment significantly increased maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–692 · show in text ↑
e1

“plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigation (RF+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–437 · show in text ↑
e2

“south edge of Loess Plateau, Shaanxi, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF+DI had higher wheat yield than SM+DI.

Treatment
plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
straw mulch combined with deficit irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it also had higher wheat yield than SM+DI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–749 · show in text ↑
e1

“plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigation (RF+DI), straw mulch combined with deficit irrigation (SM+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM+DI increased maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
straw mulch combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SM+DI treatment increased maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw mulch combined with deficit irrigation (SM+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM+DI did not increase winter wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
straw mulch combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
winter wheat yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it did not increase winter wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–837 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw mulch combined with deficit irrigation (SM+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF+DI had significantly higher soil water content than CFI or DI.

Treatment
plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
Soil water contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CFI or DI treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil water content in RF+DI and SM+DI treatments was significantly higher than those of CFI or DI treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigation (RF+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–437 · show in text ↑
e2

“Deficit Irrigation (DI), and Conventional Flood Irrigation (CFI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SM+DI had significantly higher soil water content than CFI or DI.

Treatment
straw mulch combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
Soil water contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CFI or DI treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil water content in RF+DI and SM+DI treatments was significantly higher than those of CFI or DI treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw mulch combined with deficit irrigation (SM+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM+DI had higher 0–20 cm soil water content than RF+DI.

Treatment
straw mulch combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
0-20 cme0
Comparator
RF+DI treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with RF+DI treatment, SM+DI treatment had higher soil water content (0-20 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw mulch combined with deficit irrigation (SM+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“plastic mulch ridge and straw mulch furrow combined with deficit irrigation (RF+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM+DI had the lowest soil heat accumulation among four treatments, at 741 degree days.

Treatment
straw mulch combined with deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
heate0
Direction
loweste0
Value
741 Degree Days of Soile0
Comparator
the four treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it had the lowest heat 741 Degree Days of Soil (DDs) among the four treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw mulch combined with deficit irrigation (SM+DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–491 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low soil temperature in SM+DI plots delayed winter wheat growth stages.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
growth stagese0
Treatment
SM+DIe0
Outcome
delayed winter wheat growth stages and developmente0
Qualifier
low soil temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low soil temperature in SM+DI plots, especially in early spring, delayed winter wheat growth stages and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1245 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature associated with SM+DI reduced winter wheat grain yield versus RF+DI.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
SM+DIe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
low soil temperaturee0
Comparator
RF+DI treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low soil temperature in SM+DI plots, especially in early spring, delayed winter wheat growth stages and development, thus reduced grain yield compared with RF+DI treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1302 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute RF+DI yield benefits in wheat and maize to coordinated soil moisture and temperature.

Taxon
wheat and maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
ridge-furrow systeme0
Outcome
wheat and maize yielde0
Qualifier
harmonizing soil moisture and temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The positive effects of ridge-furrow system on both wheat and maize yield could be explained by harmonizing soil moisture and temperature by this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1459 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 137 positive, 12 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.