Paper · 2017 · Zemdirbyste-Agriculture

Effect of fertilizers with different chemical composition on crop yield, nitrogen uptake and leaching in a sandy loam Luvisol

Liudmila Tripolskaja; Almantas Razukas; Gvidas Sidlauskas; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

New forms of mineral fertilizers containing bioactive components or substances controlling dissolution of granules in the soil are being developed to increase their efficiency and decrease negative environmental impacts. The present study was aimed to compare the effects of different complex fertilizers and complex fertilizer containing a nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate) on barley and potato yield and quality, and nitrogen leaching. Experiments were carried out at Vok Branch of the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry during 2012-2016. Experiments were performed in lysimetric facilities on a sandy loam Luvisol (LV) with a surface area of 1.75 m 2 and a test soil layer of 0.60 m thickness. Experimental treatments: 1) granular simple NPK fertilizers, 2) complex fertilizer nitrogenphosphate NP 33:3, 3) complex NPK fertilizer with bioactive components Eurofertil 35 and 4) complex NPK fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor NovaTec classic. The investigated simple NPK and complex fertilizers (nitrogenphosphate NP 33:3, Eurofertil 35 and NovaTec classic) had a similar effect on the grain yield of barley, but significantly increased (7.7%, P < 0.05) the tuber yield of potatoes. Application of the fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor improved the quality of barley grain and potato tubers and lowered the concentration of nitrates in tubers. Compared with simple fertilizers (ammonium nitrate, granular superphosphate and potassium chloride), the application of complex fertilizers nitrogenphosphate NP 33:3, Eurofertil 35, containing bioactive substances, and NovaTec classic, supplemented with a nitrification inhibitor, affected the dynamics of nitrogen leaching during specific periods, but no significant changes were estimated for nitrogen leaching per hydrological year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simple and complex fertilizers had similar effects on barley grain yield.

Treatment
complex fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
simple NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The investigated simple NPK and complex fertilizers (nitrogenphosphate NP 33:3, Eurofertil 35 and NovaTec classic) had a similar effect on the grain yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizers increased potato tuber yield 7.7%.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
complex fertilizerse1
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but significantly increased (7.7%, P < 0.05) the tuber yield of potatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“simple NPK and complex fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor improved barley grain quality.

Treatment
fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitore0
Outcome
quality of barley graine0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of the fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor improved the quality of barley grain and potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor improved potato tuber quality.

Treatment
fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitore0
Outcome
potato tuberse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of the fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor improved the quality of barley grain and potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor lowered nitrate concentration in tubers.

Treatment
fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitore2
Outcome
concentration of nitrates in tuberse0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowered the concentration of nitrates in tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–441 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of the fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizers changed nitrogen leaching dynamics during specific periods.

Treatment
complex fertilizerse0
Outcome
dynamics of nitrogen leachinge0
Comparator
simple fertilizerse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with simple fertilizers (ammonium nitrate, granular superphosphate and potassium chloride), the application of complex fertilizers nitrogenphosphate NP 33:3, Eurofertil 35, containing bioactive substances, and NovaTec classic, supplemented with a nitrification inhibitor, affected the dynamics of nitrogen leaching during specific periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizers did not significantly change annual nitrogen leaching.

Treatment
complex fertilizerse1
Outcome
nitrogen leaching per hydrological yeare0
Direction
no significant changese0
Comparator
simple fertilizerse2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“but no significant changes were estimated for nitrogen leaching per hydrological year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1844 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of complex fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1548 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with simple fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1441 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · organism · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 28 positive, 17 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 473 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.