Paper · 2017 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Efficacy of botanicals and bio-agents against powdery mildew disease of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Vivek Mishra; Abhilasha A. Lal; Sobita Simon

14
claims
42
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Five treatments viz. neem leaf extract @ 3%, eucalyptus leaf extract @ 3%, neem oil @ 3%, Trichoderma harzianum @ 3% and Pseudomonas flourescens @ 0.2% were applied as foliar spray as two doses at the interval of ten days. Hexaconazole @ 0.1% was used as treated check whereas, distilled water was used as untreated check. From the results, it is evident that all the treatments exhibited effectiveness over the powdery mildew of pea. However, among the treatments, neem oil was found to be the most effective organic amendment performing better than others in controlling powdery mildew disease of pea. The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%). Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil gave the lowest organic-treatment disease incidence, 31.80%.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
neem oile0
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
minimume1
Value
31.80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem oil (31.80%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus leaf extract had 34.33% disease incidence.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
eucalyptus leaf extracte0
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Value
34.33%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract had 37.20% disease incidence.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
neem leaf extracte0
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Value
37.20%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem leaf extract (37.20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas flourescens had 35.93% disease incidence.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas flourescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas flourescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Value
35.93%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–780 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum had 42.02% disease incidence.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Trichoderma harzianume0
Interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Value
42.02%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–815 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated check disease incidence was 28.77%.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
treated checke0
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Value
28.77%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated check (28.77%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated check disease incidence was 51.33%.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
untreated checke0
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Value
51.33%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“untreated check (51.33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–882 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum per cent disease incidence was found in neem oil (31.80%) followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (34.33%), neem leaf extract (37.20%), Pseudomonas flourescens (35.93%) and Trichoderma harzianum (42.02%) as compared to treated check (28.77%) and untreated check (51.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil produced 12.6 q/ha pod yield.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
neem oile0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
12.6 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem oil (12.6 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus leaf extract produced 11.5 q/ha pod yield.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
eucalyptus leaf extracte0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
11.5 q/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract produced 11.1 q/ha pod yield.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
neem leaf extracte0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
11.1 q/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas flourescens produced 10.6 q/ha pod yield.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Pseudomonas flourescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas flourescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
10.6 q/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum produced 10.2 q/ha pod yield.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Trichoderma harzianume0
Interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
10.2 q/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated check pod yield was 13.1 q/ha.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
treated checke0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
13.1 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated check (13.1 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated check pod yield was 7.6 q/ha.

Taxon
garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
untreated checke0
Outcome
pod yielde1
Value
7.6 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“untreated check (7.6 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum pod yield (q/ha) was observed in neem oil (12.6 q/ha) which was followed by eucalyptus leaf extract (11.5 q/ha), neem leaf extract (11.1 q/ha), Pseudomonas flourescens (10.6 q/ha) and Trichoderma harzianum (10.2 q/ha) as compared to treated check (13.1 q/ha) and untreated check (7.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azadirachta indica · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

botanical · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.