Paper · 2017 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Investigation of developed clay‐nanocomposite packaging film on quality of peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta) during cold storage

Hossein Ebrahimi; Bahram Abedi; Hojatollah Bodaghi; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
35
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A nanocomposite packaging film (NPF) prepared by blending polyethylene (PE) with nanoclay (closite 20A) was used. The effects of NPF on the quality parameters of mature peach fruit were investigated during 42 d of storage at 2 °C. The results showed that barrier properties of active film properly suited fruit respiration and significantly inhibited bacterial growth. The weight loss, softening and internal browning of peach fruit were also significantly inhibited by 42%, 28%, and 15%, respectively, which indicated that NPF could delay peach ripening. In addition, pH, total soluble solid, and titratable acidity of fruit in the neat PE film and the unpacked fruit changed more significantly compared with the NPF-packed fruit. Additionally, peach in NPF exhibited lower polyphenol oxidase and higher peroxidase and catalase activities than the others. These results shown that NPF may be an applicable method to control fruit loss and prolong quality of peach during storage. Practical applications: In this study a clay-nanocomposite film with modified barrier and unti-microbial properties on storage of peach fruit was investigated. The barrier properties of the nanocomposite film improved compared to the neat LDPE film so that causes to decrease the respiration rate of the product. Also it is capable to increase the shelf life and storage life of the product. In addition this nanocomposite film can be used as an active packaging with anti-microbial property. Furthermore, the melt blending extrusion for developing of the nanocomposite film can be used as an industrial and cost effective method for reduction of the product losses in postharvest period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The active film barrier suited fruit respiration.

Outcome
fruit respiratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“barrier properties of active film properly suited fruit respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The film significantly inhibited bacterial growth.

Treatment
nanocomposite packaging filme1
Interactor
bacteriale0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“barrier properties of active film properly suited fruit respiration and significantly inhibited bacterial growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“A nanocomposite packaging film (NPF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPF inhibited peach fruit weight loss by 42%.

Treatment
NPFe1
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weight loss, softening and internal browning of peach fruit were also significantly inhibited by 42%, 28%, and 15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–501 · show in text ↑
e1

“A nanocomposite packaging film (NPF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPF inhibited peach fruit softening by 28%.

Treatment
NPFe1
Outcome
softeninge0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weight loss, softening and internal browning of peach fruit were also significantly inhibited by 42%, 28%, and 15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–501 · show in text ↑
e1

“A nanocomposite packaging film (NPF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPF inhibited peach internal browning by 15%.

Treatment
NPFe1
Outcome
internal browninge0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weight loss, softening and internal browning of peach fruit were also significantly inhibited by 42%, 28%, and 15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–501 · show in text ↑
e1

“A nanocomposite packaging film (NPF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach pH, soluble solids, and acidity changed more in neat PE and unpacked fruit than in NPF-packed fruit.

Treatment
NPF-packede0
Outcome
pH, total soluble solid, and titratable aciditye0
Direction
changed more significantlye0
Comparator
neat PE film and the unpacked fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH, total soluble solid, and titratable acidity of fruit in the neat PE film and the unpacked fruit changed more significantly compared with the NPF-packed fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPF peaches had lower polyphenol oxidase activity than others.

Treatment
NPFe0
Gene
polyphenol oxidasee0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach in NPF exhibited lower polyphenol oxidase and higher peroxidase and catalase activities than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPF peaches had higher peroxidase and catalase activities than others.

Treatment
NPFe0
Outcome
peroxidase and catalase activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach in NPF exhibited lower polyphenol oxidase and higher peroxidase and catalase activities than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–855 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The film barrier improved compared with neat LDPE film.

Outcome
barrier propertiese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
neat LDPE filme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach fruit ( Prunus persica Cv. Alberta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The barrier properties of the nanocomposite film improved compared to the neat LDPE film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1229 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed NPF to control fruit loss and prolong peach quality in storage.

Outcome
control fruit loss and prolong quality of peach during storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPF may be an applicable method to control fruit loss and prolong quality of peach during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–979 · show in text ↑

storage · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

storage · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.