Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Evaluation of nanosilicon dioxide and chitosan on tissue culture of apple under agar-induced osmotic stress

Saber Avestan; Lotfali Naseri; Allen V. Barker

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In vitro, applications of nanosilicon dioxide (SiO2) and chitosan were investigated for their effects on growth and proliferation of apple (Malus domestica Borkh. ‘Gala’) explants under osmotic stress induced by agar to simulate drought stress and under non-stressed conditions. The experiment included five levels of SiO2 (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg L−1), two levels of chitosan (0 and 40 mg L−1), and two levels of agar (7 g L−1 and 9 g L−1) added to Murashige and Skoog medium. Under non-stressed conditions (7 g L−1 agar), application of SiO2 at 50 or 100 mg −1 increased proliferation of apple explants. Use of 50 or 100 mg L−1 SiO2 or 40 mg L−1 chitosan increased growth of apple explants under osmotic stress (9 g L−1 agar). This research suggests that use of SiO2 or chitosan may improve plant growth and tolerance to stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under non-stressed conditions, SiO2 at 50 or 100 mg/L increased proliferation of apple explants.

Taxon
apple (Malus domestica Borkh. ‘Gala’)Malus domesticae1
Treatment
application of SiO2 at 50 or 100 mg −1e2
Outcome
proliferatione2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
Under non-stressed conditions (7 g L−1 agar)e2
Setting
In vitroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In vitro, applications of nanosilicon dioxide (SiO2) and chitosan were investigated for their effects on growth and proliferation of apple (Malus domestica Borkh. ‘Gala’) explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–179 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under non-stressed conditions (7 g L−1 agar), application of SiO2 at 50 or 100 mg −1 increased proliferation of apple explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 at 50 or 100 mg/L increased growth of apple explants under osmotic stress.

Treatment
50 or 100 mg L−1 SiO2e3
Outcome
growth of apple explantse3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
under osmotic stress (9 g L−1 agar)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In vitro, applications of nanosilicon dioxide (SiO2) and chitosan were investigated for their effects on growth and proliferation of apple (Malus domestica Borkh. ‘Gala’) explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–179 · show in text ↑
e3

“Use of 50 or 100 mg L−1 SiO2 or 40 mg L−1 chitosan increased growth of apple explants under osmotic stress (9 g L−1 agar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 40 mg/L increased growth of apple explants under osmotic stress.

Treatment
40 mg L−1 chitosane3
Outcome
growth of apple explantse3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
under osmotic stress (9 g L−1 agar)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In vitro, applications of nanosilicon dioxide (SiO2) and chitosan were investigated for their effects on growth and proliferation of apple (Malus domestica Borkh. ‘Gala’) explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–179 · show in text ↑
e3

“Use of 50 or 100 mg L−1 SiO2 or 40 mg L−1 chitosan increased growth of apple explants under osmotic stress (9 g L−1 agar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 or chitosan may improve apple plant growth and tolerance to stress.

Treatment
SiO2 or chitosane4
Outcome
plant growth and tolerance to stresse4
Direction
improvee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In vitro, applications of nanosilicon dioxide (SiO2) and chitosan were investigated for their effects on growth and proliferation of apple (Malus domestica Borkh. ‘Gala’) explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–179 · show in text ↑
e4

“This research suggests that use of SiO2 or chitosan may improve plant growth and tolerance to stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–832 · show in text ↑

chitosan · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chitosan · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

silicon dioxide · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.