Paper · 2017 · PLoS ONE

Global gene expression in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves to waterlogging stress

Yanjun Zhang; Xiangqiang Kong; Jianlong Dai; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton is sensitive to waterlogging stress, which usually results in stunted growth and yield loss. To date, the molecular mechanisms underlying the responses to waterlogging in cotton remain elusive. Cotton was grown in a rain-shelter and subjected to 0 (control)-, 10-, 15- and 20-d waterlogging at flowering stage. The fourth-leaves on the main-stem from the top were sampled and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for physiological measurement. Global gene transcription in the leaves of 15-d waterlogged plants was analyzed by RNA-Seq. Seven hundred and ninety four genes were up-regulated and 1018 genes were down-regulated in waterlogged cotton leaves compared with non-waterlogged control. The differentially expressed genes were mainly related to photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, glycolysis and plant hormone signal transduction. KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) analysis indicated that most genes related to flavonoid biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, amino acid metabolism and biosynthesis as well as circadian rhythm pathways were differently expressed. Waterlogging increased the expression of anaerobic fermentation related genes, such as alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), but decreased the leaf chlorophyll concentration and photosynthesis by down-regulating the expression of photosynthesis related genes. Many genes related to plant hormones and transcription factors were differently expressed under waterlogging stress. Most of the ethylene related genes and ethylene-responsive factor-type transcription factors were up-regulated under water-logging stress, suggesting that ethylene may play key roles in the survival of cotton under waterlogging stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogged cotton leaves had 794 up-regulated genes relative to non-waterlogged controls.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
genes were up-regulatede0
Direction
up-regulatede0
Value
Seven hundred and ninety foure0
Comparator
non-waterlogged controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seven hundred and ninety four genes were up-regulated and 1018 genes were down-regulated in waterlogged cotton leaves compared with non-waterlogged control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogged cotton leaves had 1018 down-regulated genes relative to non-waterlogged controls.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
genes were down-regulatede0
Direction
down-regulatede0
Value
1018e0
Comparator
non-waterlogged controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seven hundred and ninety four genes were up-regulated and 1018 genes were down-regulated in waterlogged cotton leaves compared with non-waterlogged control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentially expressed genes were mainly related to photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, glycolysis and plant hormone signal transduction.

Outcome
differentially expressed genese0
Qualifier
photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, glycolysis and plant hormone signal transductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“The differentially expressed genes were mainly related to photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, glycolysis and plant hormone signal transduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–875 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most genes in flavonoid biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, amino acid metabolism and biosynthesis, and circadian rhythm pathways were differentially expressed.

Outcome
genes related to flavonoid biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, amino acid metabolism and biosynthesis as well as circadian rhythm pathways were differently expressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“most genes related to flavonoid biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, amino acid metabolism and biosynthesis as well as circadian rhythm pathways were differently expressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased expression of anaerobic fermentation related genes including ADH.

Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Gene
alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)e0
Outcome
expression of anaerobic fermentation related genese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Waterlogging increased the expression of anaerobic fermentation related genes, such as alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased leaf chlorophyll concentration.

Treatment
Waterlogginge0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Waterlogging increased the expression of anaerobic fermentation related genes, such as alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), but decreased the leaf chlorophyll concentration and photosynthesis by down-regulating the expression of photosynthesis related genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1374 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased photosynthesis by down-regulating expression of photosynthesis related genes.

Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
down-regulating the expression of photosynthesis related genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreased the leaf chlorophyll concentration and photosynthesis by down-regulating the expression of photosynthesis related genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1374 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many plant hormone and transcription factor genes were differentially expressed under waterlogging.

Treatment
waterlogging stresse0
Outcome
genes related to plant hormones and transcription factors were differently expressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Many genes related to plant hormones and transcription factors were differently expressed under waterlogging stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1491 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most ethylene related genes and ethylene-responsive factor-type transcription factors were up-regulated under waterlogging.

Treatment
water-logging stresse0
Outcome
ethylene related genes and ethylene-responsive factor-type transcription factorse0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most of the ethylene related genes and ethylene-responsive factor-type transcription factors were up-regulated under water-logging stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1630 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene may play key roles in cotton survival under waterlogging stress.

Compound
ethylenee0
Outcome
survival of cotton under waterlogging stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“suggesting that ethylene may play key roles in the survival of cotton under waterlogging stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1727 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.