Paper · 2017 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Daily Dynamics of Sugar and Phenol Contents in Apple Fruitlets during June Drop

Jerneja JAKOPIC; Franci STAMPAR; Robert VEBERIC

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The occurrence of the abscission signal in young developing fruits on apple trees (Malus domestica) was studied. Apple has a natural system of fruitlet shedding, so called June drop. Although physiological fruit drop is unable to guarantee production of marketable apples and avoid alternate bearing, knowledge of this is a key background for successful fruit thinning. A study was carried out on apple trees cv. ‘Golden Delicious’ during June drop. On three dates (beginning, middle and after June drop), the daily dynamics of HPLC detected individual sugar and spectrophotometrically detected total phenolic contents were investigated in central (K) and lateral (L) fruitlets. The results of daily dynamics showed the highest sugar contents at 2 p.m. On the final sampling date, on 2nd July 2015, we observed a significant difference between sugar contents at 2 p.m. and the morning and afternoon measurements. Contents of sugars in K and L fruitlets were not significantly different. Total phenolic content at the beginning of June drop was higher than at the end. There was no statistically significant difference between K and L in an individual time period, while there were statistically significant differences in total phenolic content among the sampling dates. Although sugar and phenolic contents in K and L fruitlets were rarely statistically different, their contents changed during June drop. In general, sugar contents increased and phenolic contents decreased during the process, while the daily dynamic depended on weather conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruitlet sugar contents were highest at 2 p.m.

Outcome
sugar contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2 p.m.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of daily dynamics showed the highest sugar contents at 2 p.m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

On 2 July 2015, sugar contents at 2 p.m. differed significantly from morning and afternoon measurements.

Outcome
sugar contentse0
Qualifier
2nd July 2015e0
Comparator
morning and afternoon measurementse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the final sampling date, on 2nd July 2015, we observed a significant difference between sugar contents at 2 p.m. and the morning and afternoon measurements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar contents of central and lateral fruitlets did not differ significantly.

Organ / stage
K and L fruitletse0
Outcome
Contents of sugarse0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contents of sugars in K and L fruitlets were not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content was higher at the beginning of June drop than at the end.

Outcome
Total phenolic contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
at the ende0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic content at the beginning of June drop was higher than at the end.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Central and lateral fruitlets showed no significant difference in total phenolic content within a time period.

Organ / stage
K and Le0
Outcome
Total phenolic contente1
Direction
no statistically significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no statistically significant difference between K and L in an individual time period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total phenolic content at the beginning of June drop was higher than at the end.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content differed significantly among sampling dates.

Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Qualifier
among the sampling datese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were statistically significant differences in total phenolic content among the sampling dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar contents generally increased during June drop.

Outcome
sugar contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, sugar contents increased and phenolic contents decreased during the process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic contents generally decreased during June drop.

Outcome
phenolic contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, sugar contents increased and phenolic contents decreased during the process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily variation in sugar and phenolic contents depended on weather conditions.

Outcome
daily dynamice0
Direction
depended one0
Setting
weather conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the daily dynamic depended on weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar contents increased and phenolic contents decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑