Paper · 2016 · Forage Research

Performance of single cut forage sorghum genotypes to different fertility levels.

Satpal; B. S. Duhan; Surjeet Kumar Arya; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to find out the performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels. The field experiment was conducted at Forage Section Research Farm, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India during kharif season, 2015. Genotypes SPH 1752, CSH 13 and HJ 541 were sown at 50, 75, 100 and 125 per cent of RDF, where RDF was 80 kg N, 40 kg P2O5 and 40 kg K2O /ha . Significantly highest green fodder yield was recorded in HJ 541 (493.8 q/ha) and dry matter in SPH 1752 (115.2 q/ha) as compared to CSH 13 genotype. The maximum net returns (26262.4) and B : C ratio (1.74) were observed in genotype HJ 541. On comparison with different fertility levels, highest green fodder (516.37 q/ha) and dry matter (125.08 q/ha) were recorded under 125 per cent RDF. The maximum net returns (Rs. 28095.9 q/ha) and B : C ratio (1.78) were observed with the application of 100 per cent RDF followed by 125 and 75 per cent RDF. Conclusively, the genotypes, HJ 541 and SPH 1752 performed better and the application of RDF was the most suitable and economical fertilization practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype HJ 541 had the significantly highest green fodder yield, 493.8 q/ha, compared with CSH 13.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Material
HJ 541e1
Outcome
green fodder yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
493.8 q/hae1
Comparator
CSH 13 genotypee1

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly highest green fodder yield was recorded in HJ 541 (493.8 q/ha) and dry matter in SPH 1752 (115.2 q/ha) as compared to CSH 13 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype SPH 1752 had the highest dry matter, 115.2 q/ha, compared with CSH 13.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Material
SPH 1752e1
Outcome
dry mattere1
Direction
higheste1
Value
115.2 q/hae1
Comparator
CSH 13 genotypee1

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly highest green fodder yield was recorded in HJ 541 (493.8 q/ha) and dry matter in SPH 1752 (115.2 q/ha) as compared to CSH 13 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype HJ 541 gave the maximum net returns, 26262.4.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Material
HJ 541e2
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
maximume2
Value
26262.4e2

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum net returns (26262.4) and B : C ratio (1.74) were observed in genotype HJ 541”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–680 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype HJ 541 gave the maximum B : C ratio, 1.74.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Material
HJ 541e2
Outcome
B : C ratioe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
1.74e2

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum net returns (26262.4) and B : C ratio (1.74) were observed in genotype HJ 541”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125 per cent RDF treatment gave the highest green fodder yield, 516.37 q/ha.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
125 per cent RDFe3
Outcome
green foddere3
Direction
higheste3
Value
516.37 q/hae3
Comparator
different fertility levelse4

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e3

“highest green fodder (516.37 q/ha) and dry matter (125.08 q/ha) were recorded under 125 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–829 · show in text ↑
e4

“On comparison with different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125 per cent RDF treatment gave the highest dry matter, 125.08 q/ha.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
125 per cent RDFe3
Outcome
dry mattere3
Direction
higheste3
Value
125.08 q/hae3
Comparator
different fertility levelse4

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e3

“highest green fodder (516.37 q/ha) and dry matter (125.08 q/ha) were recorded under 125 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–829 · show in text ↑
e4

“On comparison with different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 per cent RDF treatment gave the maximum net returns, Rs. 28095.9 q/ha.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
100 per cent RDFe5
Outcome
net returnse5
Direction
maximume5
Value
Rs. 28095.9 q/hae5
Comparator
125 and 75 per cent RDFe5

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e5

“The maximum net returns (Rs. 28095.9 q/ha) and B : C ratio (1.78) were observed with the application of 100 per cent RDF followed by 125 and 75 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 per cent RDF treatment gave the maximum B : C ratio, 1.78.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
100 per cent RDFe5
Outcome
B : C ratioe5
Direction
maximume5
Value
1.78e5
Comparator
125 and 75 per cent RDFe5

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e5

“The maximum net returns (Rs. 28095.9 q/ha) and B : C ratio (1.78) were observed with the application of 100 per cent RDF followed by 125 and 75 per cent RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–987 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes HJ 541 and SPH 1752 performed better and are recommended.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Material
HJ 541 and SPH 1752e6
Outcome
performed bettere6

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e6

“Conclusively, the genotypes, HJ 541 and SPH 1752 performed better and the application of RDF was the most suitable and economical fertilization practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1141 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of RDF is the most suitable and economical fertilization practice for forage sorghum.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
application of RDFe6
Outcome
the most suitable and economical fertilization practicee6

Verbatim

e0

“performance of different single cut forage sorghum genotypes under different fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–142 · show in text ↑
e6

“Conclusively, the genotypes, HJ 541 and SPH 1752 performed better and the application of RDF was the most suitable and economical fertilization practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1141 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ

120 papers: 104 positive, 16 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.