Paper · 2017 · Applied Biological Research

Effect of calcium nitrate and gibberellic acid on storage life of pear ( Pyrus pyrifolia ) cv. nijisseiki

Kawaljit Kaur; P.P.S. Gill; S.K. Jawandha

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses as its maturity time in north India coincides with summer months. Hence, to improve the storage life, the fruits were given post-harvest dip of calcium nitrate @ 0, 2, 3 and 4% and gibberellic acid (GA3) @ 0, 20, 40 and 60 ppm for 5 min. Treated and untreated (control) fruits were packed in CFB boxes and stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days. Fruits were analyzed for various physicochemical changes on 0, 30, 50 and 70 days after storage. Both calcium nitrate and GA3 treatments were effective in minimizing the physiological loss in weight (PLW) and maintaining the fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, total sugars content, sensory quality and pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity as compared to control during storage period. After 70 days of storage, minimum PLW (4.81%) and highest fruit firmness (3.88 kgf), sensory quality (7.15), TSS (12.35%) total sugars (8.45%), and PME activity (1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used) were recorded in 3% calcium nitrate treated fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate and GA3 treatments minimized physiological loss in weight of pear fruit compared to control during storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
calcium nitrate and GA3e2
Outcome
physiological loss in weight (PLW)e2
Direction
minimizinge2
Qualifier
during storage periode2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both calcium nitrate and GA3 treatments were effective in minimizing the physiological loss in weight (PLW) and maintaining the fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, total sugars content, sensory quality and pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity as compared to control during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate and GA3 treatments maintained fruit firmness, TSS and titratable acidity of pear fruit compared to control during storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
calcium nitrate and GA3e2
Outcome
fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable aciditye2
Direction
maintaininge2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both calcium nitrate and GA3 treatments were effective in minimizing the physiological loss in weight (PLW) and maintaining the fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, total sugars content, sensory quality and pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity as compared to control during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate and GA3 treatments maintained total sugars content, sensory quality and PME activity of pear fruit compared to control during storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
calcium nitrate and GA3e2
Outcome
total sugars content, sensory quality and pectin methyl esterase (PME) activitye2
Direction
maintaininge2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both calcium nitrate and GA3 treatments were effective in minimizing the physiological loss in weight (PLW) and maintaining the fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, total sugars content, sensory quality and pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity as compared to control during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3% calcium nitrate treatment gave the minimum physiological loss in weight, 4.81%, after 70 days of storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
3% calcium nitratee2
Outcome
PLWe2
Direction
minimume2
Value
4.81%e2
Qualifier
After 70 days of storagee2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“After 70 days of storage, minimum PLW (4.81%) and highest fruit firmness (3.88 kgf), sensory quality (7.15), TSS (12.35%) total sugars (8.45%), and PME activity (1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used) were recorded in 3% calcium nitrate treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3% calcium nitrate treatment gave the highest fruit firmness, 3.88 kgf, after 70 days of storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
3% calcium nitratee2
Outcome
fruit firmnesse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3.88 kgfe2
Qualifier
After 70 days of storagee2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“After 70 days of storage, minimum PLW (4.81%) and highest fruit firmness (3.88 kgf), sensory quality (7.15), TSS (12.35%) total sugars (8.45%), and PME activity (1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used) were recorded in 3% calcium nitrate treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3% calcium nitrate treatment gave the highest sensory quality score, 7.15, after 70 days of storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
3% calcium nitratee2
Outcome
sensory qualitye2
Direction
higheste2
Value
7.15e2
Qualifier
After 70 days of storagee2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“After 70 days of storage, minimum PLW (4.81%) and highest fruit firmness (3.88 kgf), sensory quality (7.15), TSS (12.35%) total sugars (8.45%), and PME activity (1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used) were recorded in 3% calcium nitrate treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3% calcium nitrate treatment gave the highest TSS, 12.35%, after 70 days of storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
3% calcium nitratee2
Outcome
TSSe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
12.35%e2
Qualifier
After 70 days of storagee2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“After 70 days of storage, minimum PLW (4.81%) and highest fruit firmness (3.88 kgf), sensory quality (7.15), TSS (12.35%) total sugars (8.45%), and PME activity (1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used) were recorded in 3% calcium nitrate treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3% calcium nitrate treatment gave the highest total sugars, 8.45%, after 70 days of storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
3% calcium nitratee2
Outcome
total sugarse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
8.45%e2
Qualifier
After 70 days of storagee2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“After 70 days of storage, minimum PLW (4.81%) and highest fruit firmness (3.88 kgf), sensory quality (7.15), TSS (12.35%) total sugars (8.45%), and PME activity (1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used) were recorded in 3% calcium nitrate treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3% calcium nitrate treatment gave PME activity of 1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used after 70 days of storage.

Material
cv. Nijisseikie0
Treatment
3% calcium nitratee2
Outcome
PME activitye2
Value
1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH usede2
Qualifier
After 70 days of storagee2
Setting
low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cv. Nijisseiki are vulnerable to post-harvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored at low temperature conditions (0–1°C and 90–95% R.H) for 70 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–463 · show in text ↑
e2

“After 70 days of storage, minimum PLW (4.81%) and highest fruit firmness (3.88 kgf), sensory quality (7.15), TSS (12.35%) total sugars (8.45%), and PME activity (1.31 ml of 0.02 N NaOH used) were recorded in 3% calcium nitrate treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1121 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.