Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Impact of Fertility Levels and Weed Management Practices on Weed Dynamics and Yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) under Eastern U.P. Conditions

Pradeep Kumar; J.P. Singh; M.K. Singh; et al.

20
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during the Rabi season of 2012-13 and 2013-14 to examine the effects of fertility levels and weed management practices on weed density, growth parameters and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design comprising six main plot treatments viz. Control (F0), 100% RDF (F1), 75% RDF + 2% urea spray at pre-flowering and pod initiation stage (F2), 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha at 35, 50 and 65 DAS as foliar spray (F3), 100% RDF + 2% urea spray at pre-flowering and pod initiation stage (F4), 100% RDF+ Plantgro 9 kg/ha at 35, 50 and 65 DAS as foliar spray (F5) and four sub-plot treatments viz. unweeded (W0), weed free (W1), pendimethalin 1 kg a.i./ha (W2), imazethapyr 37.5 g a.i./ha (W3). The major group of weeds found in the experimental field was Cyperus rotundus, Chenopodium album, Solanum nigrum and Cynodon dactylon. The results indicated that fertility levels and weed management had a significant effect on weed population dynamics and lentil crop. Higher yield attributes, yield and harvest index was recorded with the treatment 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha. Higher grain yield (1283.08 kg/ha) was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha whereas straw yield (2140.64 kg/ha), net returns 23218.09 (Rs./ha) and B:C ratio (2.29) was obtained with 100% RDF+ 2% urea spray. The increase in yield was 11.41 % and 29.83% over 100% RDF + 2% urea spray and control respectively. Highest N, P, K uptake (50.08, 7.29 and 22.92 kg/ha) respectively was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha. Total weed count and dry weight decreased significantly with the application of post-emergence application of imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha and was comparable to pendimethalin 1 kg/ha. Highest weed control efficiency of 68.87% was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha. Higher grain yield (1088.05 kg/ha), straw yield (2121.43 kg/ha), net returns 22625.76 and B: C ratio (2.35) was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha. This treatment also recorded the highest N (39.84 kg/ha), P (4.88 kg/ha), K (15.93 kg/ha) uptake and protein content (22.72%) of lentil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The experimental field contained Cyperus rotundus, Chenopodium album, Solanum nigrum and Cynodon dactylon.

Taxon
Cyperus rotundus, Chenopodium album, Solanum nigrum and Cynodon dactylonChenopodium albumSolanum nigrumCynodon dactylonCyperus rotunduse0
Outcome
major group of weeds founde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum nigrum
Solanum nigrum · TaxonHladac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major group of weeds found in the experimental field was Cyperus rotundus, Chenopodium album, Solanum nigrum and Cynodon dactylon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertility and weed management significantly affected weed population dynamics and lentil crop.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
fertility levels and weed managemente0
Outcome
weed population dynamics and lentil crope0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertility levels and weed management had a significant effect on weed population dynamics and lentil crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha treatment produced higher yield attributes, yield and harvest index.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes, yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yield attributes, yield and harvest index was recorded with the treatment 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + Plantgro treatment gave higher lentil grain yield of 1283.08 kg/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
1283.08 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher grain yield (1283.08 kg/ha) was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF plus 2% urea treatment yielded 2140.64 kg/ha straw.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100% RDF+ 2% urea spraye0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
2140.64 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (2140.64 kg/ha), net returns 23218.09 (Rs./ha) and B:C ratio (2.29) was obtained with 100% RDF+ 2% urea spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF plus 2% urea treatment gave net returns of 23218.09 Rs./ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100% RDF+ 2% urea spraye0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
23218.09 (Rs./ha)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns 23218.09 (Rs./ha) and B:C ratio (2.29) was obtained with 100% RDF+ 2% urea spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF plus 2% urea treatment gave a B:C ratio of 2.29.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100% RDF+ 2% urea spraye0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
2.29e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B:C ratio (2.29) was obtained with 100% RDF+ 2% urea spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased 11.41 % over 100% RDF plus 2% urea spray.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/hae1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.41 %e0
Comparator
100% RDF + 2% urea spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yield was 11.41 % and 29.83% over 100% RDF + 2% urea spray and control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher grain yield (1283.08 kg/ha) was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased 29.83% over control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/hae1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
29.83%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yield was 11.41 % and 29.83% over 100% RDF + 2% urea spray and control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher grain yield (1283.08 kg/ha) was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Plantgro treatment had highest nitrogen uptake of 50.08 kg/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/hae0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
50.08e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest N, P, K uptake (50.08, 7.29 and 22.92 kg/ha) respectively was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Plantgro treatment had highest phosphorus uptake of 7.29 kg/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/hae0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
7.29e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest N, P, K uptake (50.08, 7.29 and 22.92 kg/ha) respectively was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Plantgro treatment had highest potassium uptake of 22.92 kg/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/hae0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
22.92 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest N, P, K uptake (50.08, 7.29 and 22.92 kg/ha) respectively was recorded with 75% RDF + Plantgro 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr significantly reduced total weed count and dry weight, comparably to pendimethalin.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae0
Outcome
Total weed count and dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
pendimethalin 1 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Total weed count and dry weight decreased significantly with the application of post-emergence application of imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha and was comparable to pendimethalin 1 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr had the highest weed-control efficiency of 68.87%.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
68.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Highest weed control efficiency of 68.87% was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave higher lentil grain yield of 1088.05 kg/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
1088.05 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher grain yield (1088.05 kg/ha), straw yield (2121.43 kg/ha), net returns 22625.76 and B: C ratio (2.35) was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave straw yield of 2121.43 kg/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
2121.43 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (2121.43 kg/ha), net returns 22625.76 and B: C ratio (2.35) was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–1971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave net returns of 22625.76 and a B:C ratio of 2.35.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae0
Outcome
net returns 22625.76 and B: C ratioe0
Value
2.35e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns 22625.76 and B: C ratio (2.35) was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–1971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave highest N uptake of 39.84 kg/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae1
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.84 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded the highest N (39.84 kg/ha), P (4.88 kg/ha), K (15.93 kg/ha) uptake and protein content (22.72%) of lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2108 · show in text ↑
e1

“was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha. This treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave highest P uptake of 4.88 kg/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae1
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.88 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded the highest N (39.84 kg/ha), P (4.88 kg/ha), K (15.93 kg/ha) uptake and protein content (22.72%) of lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2108 · show in text ↑
e1

“was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha. This treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–1987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave highest K uptake of 15.93 kg/ha and protein content of 22.72%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
imazethapyr 37.5 g/hae1
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.93 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded the highest N (39.84 kg/ha), P (4.88 kg/ha), K (15.93 kg/ha) uptake and protein content (22.72%) of lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2108 · show in text ↑
e1

“was recorded with imazethapyr 37.5 g/ha. This treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–1987 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Imazethapyr · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.