Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Polymer‐Coated Urea Application Could Produce More Grain Yield in “Super” Rice

Chu Guang; Chen Tingting; Chen Song; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Polymer‐coated urea could increase both grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice production, particularly in super rice. Larger sink size, more productive tillers and deeper root distribution are important agronomic performances in super rice. Higher plant activities are important physiological traits in super rice. Extensive economic reforms have resulted in a significant decrease in the involvement of rural labor force in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) production in China. One of the most effective ways in minimizing the use of labor in field management while maintaining or even increasing grain yield is by using polymer‐coated urea (PCU) instead of conventional urea (CU). This study investigated whether super rice (SR) cultivars could exhibit better yield performance and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) under PCU application than non ‐ super rice (NSR) cultivars. Two representative SR cultivars and two representative NSR cultivars were field grown. Three treatments, no nitrogen application (0N), CU application, and PCU application, were conducted, the application N rate of CU and PCU were both 200 kg N ha −1 . Compared to NSR cultivars, SR cultivars had larger sink size, more productive tillers, larger root biomass and deeper root distribution, higher root oxidation activity at mid‐ and late grain‐filling period, greater aboveground biomass production at mid‐ and late growth stages, and greater nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC) accumulation in the stem and more nonstructural carbohydrate per spikelet (NPS) at anthesis under PCU. Polymer‐coated urea increased grain yield and agronomic NUE by 11.6 and 5.5% in SR cultivars and 4.8 and 2.2% in NSR cultivars, respectively. We conclude that using PCU could increase both grain yield and NUE in rice production, especially in SR cultivars. Improved agronomic and physiological performance contributes to an increase in grain yield and NUE in SR cultivars under PCU.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under PCU, super rice had larger sink size and more productive tillers than non super rice.

Material
SR cultivarse0
Outcome
larger sink size, more productive tillerse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
NSR cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to NSR cultivars, SR cultivars had larger sink size, more productive tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super rice had larger root biomass and deeper root distribution than non super rice under PCU.

Material
SR cultivarse1
Outcome
root biomass and deeper root distributione0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
NSR cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“larger root biomass and deeper root distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to NSR cultivars, SR cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super rice had higher root oxidation activity in middle and late grain filling.

Organ / stage
mid‐ and late grain‐filling periode0
Outcome
root oxidation activitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher root oxidation activity at mid‐ and late grain‐filling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super rice had greater aboveground biomass at middle and late growth stages.

Organ / stage
mid‐ and late growth stagese0
Outcome
aboveground biomass productione0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater aboveground biomass production at mid‐ and late growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super rice accumulated more stem NSC and NSC per spikelet at anthesis.

Treatment
PCUe0
Outcome
nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC) accumulation in the stem and more nonstructural carbohydrate per spikelet (NPS)e0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC) accumulation in the stem and more nonstructural carbohydrate per spikelet (NPS) at anthesis under PCU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU increased grain yield in super rice by 11.6%.

Material
SR cultivarse0
Treatment
Polymer‐coated ureae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.6e0
Comparator
CUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polymer‐coated urea increased grain yield and agronomic NUE by 11.6 and 5.5% in SR cultivars and 4.8 and 2.2% in NSR cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional urea (CU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU increased agronomic NUE in super rice by 5.5%.

Material
SR cultivarse0
Treatment
Polymer‐coated ureae0
Outcome
agronomic NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.5%e0
Comparator
CUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polymer‐coated urea increased grain yield and agronomic NUE by 11.6 and 5.5% in SR cultivars and 4.8 and 2.2% in NSR cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional urea (CU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU increased grain yield in non super rice by 4.8%.

Material
NSR cultivarse0
Treatment
Polymer‐coated ureae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.8e0
Comparator
CUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polymer‐coated urea increased grain yield and agronomic NUE by 11.6 and 5.5% in SR cultivars and 4.8 and 2.2% in NSR cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional urea (CU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU increased agronomic NUE in non super rice by 2.2%.

Material
NSR cultivarse0
Treatment
Polymer‐coated ureae0
Outcome
agronomic NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.2%e0
Comparator
CUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polymer‐coated urea increased grain yield and agronomic NUE by 11.6 and 5.5% in SR cultivars and 4.8 and 2.2% in NSR cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional urea (CU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–693 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.