Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Crop Geometry and Foliar Nutrition on Growth and Yield of Irrigated Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)

S. Rajeshkumar; S. Nalliah Durairaj; V. Kannan

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during Rabi season of 2012– 13, at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam, to evaluate the suitability and economic viability of crop geometry and foliar nutrition on growth and yield of irrigated blackgram. The experiment was laid out in Randomized block design with three replications, comprising fifteen treatments. The variety used was VBN (Bg) 5. Results revealed that Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125% recorded for better growth characters of individual plant viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of root nodules plant-1, Light interception and Yield attributes of individual plant like number of pod clusters plant-1, number of pods cluster-1, pod length and number of seeds pod-1. In the case of dry matter production kg ha-1 and leaf area index of growth attributing characters, grain, bhusa and haulm yield kg ha-1 were recorded higher with crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%. The yield levels were on par with crop geometry of 30 × 20 cm with same application. The uptake of nutrients was also higher under crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm as well as 30 × 20 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%. The highest net return and B: C ratio were obtained when the crop geometry at 30 × 20 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 × 30 cm geometry with TNAU Pulse Wonder improved plant height, branches and root nodules.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of root nodules plant-1e0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125% recorded for better growth characters of individual plant viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of root nodules plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That geometry and spray improved light interception.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
Light interceptione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125% recorded for better growth characters of individual plant viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of root nodules plant-1, Light interception”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That geometry and spray improved pod clusters, pods per cluster and pod length.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
number of pod clusters plant-1, number of pods cluster-1, pod lengthe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125% recorded for better growth characters of individual plant viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of root nodules plant-1, Light interception and Yield attributes of individual plant like number of pod clusters plant-1, number of pods cluster-1, pod length and number of seeds pod-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That geometry and spray improved seeds per pod.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
number of seeds pod-1e0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop geometry at 40 × 30 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125% recorded for better growth characters of individual plant viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of root nodules plant-1, Light interception and Yield attributes of individual plant like number of pod clusters plant-1, number of pods cluster-1, pod length and number of seeds pod-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 × 10 cm geometry with spray raised dry matter and leaf area index.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
dry matter production kg ha-1 and leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter production kg ha-1 and leaf area index of growth attributing characters, grain, bhusa and haulm yield kg ha-1 were recorded higher with crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 × 10 cm geometry with spray raised grain, bhusa and haulm yields.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
grain, bhusa and haulm yield kg ha-1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain, bhusa and haulm yield kg ha-1 were recorded higher with crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield at 30 × 20 cm with the same spray was on par with 30 × 10 cm.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
crop geometry of 30 × 20 cm with same applicatione0
Outcome
yield levelse0
Direction
on pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield levels were on par with crop geometry of 30 × 20 cm with same application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake was higher at 30 × 10 cm with TNAU Pulse Wonder.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
crop geometry of 30 × 10 cme0
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uptake of nutrients was also higher under crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm as well as 30 × 20 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake was higher at 30 × 20 cm with TNAU Pulse Wonder.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
30 × 20 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uptake of nutrients was also higher under crop geometry of 30 × 10 cm as well as 30 × 20 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return and benefit–cost ratio peaked at 30 × 20 cm with foliar spray.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
crop geometry at 30 × 20 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%e0
Outcome
net return and B: C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net return and B: C ratio were obtained when the crop geometry at 30 × 20 cm with foliar spray of TNAU Pulse Wonder at 1.125%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑

application · symbiosis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

140 papers: 140 positive, 0 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.