Abstract
Askari grape is the dominant cultivar of the region which is damaged annually by winter cold. To study the biochemical changes and to reduce the effect of cold stress during the winter, this study was conducted in one of the vineyards of Dana city as a factorial experiment with a randomized complete block design with three replications and two vines in each plot. In this experiment, salicylic acid at concentrations of 0, 150, 300 and 450 mg/l and potassium sulphate at 0, 1, and 2% were used as foliar spray in 2014. Sampling was performed at different periods: two weeks after spraying, the onset of dormancy, deep dormancy stage and before bud growth in the following year, and related characteristics was measured and recorded in each stage. Sampling stages had significant effect on the increase of soluble sugars at 1%, while the interaction of salicylic acid × stages of sampling, and salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling had significant effect at 5%, and other treatments had no significant effect on soluble sugar content. Sampling stages had significant effect on the starch of grape bud at 1%, and other treatments had no significant effect on the starch. The effects of sampling stages and the interaction of potassium sulphate × stages of sampling on the protein content of grape buds were significant at the levels of 1% and 5%, respectively, and other treatments did not show significant effect on the protein content. The proline content of grape buds was significantly affected by salicylic acid at 5%, as well as the stages of sampling, the interaction of salicylic acid × potassium sulphate, salicylic acid × stages of sampling, potassium sulphate × stages of sampling and salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling at the level of 1%, and other treatments had no significant effect on proline content. Increase in the amount of salicylic acid and potassium sulphate and their interaction caused a significant effect on the increase in the amount of soluble sugars, protein and proline of buds, however, their effect on the starch was not significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Sampling stage significantly increased soluble sugars.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sampling stages had significant effect on the increase of soluble sugars at 1%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The salicylic acid by sampling stage interaction significantly affected soluble sugar content.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“the interaction of salicylic acid × stages of sampling, and salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling had significant effect at 5%”
e1“other treatments had no significant effect on soluble sugar content.”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The salicylic acid by potassium sulphate by sampling stage interaction significantly affected soluble sugar content.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of samplinge0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar contente1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling had significant effect at 5%”
e1“other treatments had no significant effect on soluble sugar content.”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Sampling stage significantly affected grape bud starch.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Sampling stages had significant effect on the starch of grape bud at 1%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Sampling stage significantly affected grape bud protein content.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The effects of sampling stages and the interaction of potassium sulphate × stages of sampling on the protein content of grape buds were significant at the levels of 1% and 5%, respectively”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The potassium sulphate by sampling stage interaction significantly affected grape bud protein content.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- potassium sulphate × stages of samplinge0
- Outcome
- protein content of grape budse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The effects of sampling stages and the interaction of potassium sulphate × stages of sampling on the protein content of grape buds were significant at the levels of 1% and 5%, respectively”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid significantly affected grape bud proline content.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The proline content of grape buds was significantly affected by salicylic acid at 5%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Sampling stage significantly affected grape bud proline content.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“the stages of sampling, the interaction of salicylic acid × potassium sulphate, salicylic acid × stages of sampling, potassium sulphate × stages of sampling and salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling at the level of 1%”
e1“The proline content of grape buds was significantly affected by salicylic acid at 5%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The salicylic acid by potassium sulphate interaction significantly affected grape bud proline content.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“the interaction of salicylic acid × potassium sulphate, salicylic acid × stages of sampling, potassium sulphate × stages of sampling and salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling at the level of 1%”
e1“The proline content of grape buds was significantly affected by salicylic acid at 5%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The salicylic acid by sampling stage interaction significantly affected grape bud proline content.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“salicylic acid × stages of sampling, potassium sulphate × stages of sampling and salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling at the level of 1%”
e1“The proline content of grape buds was significantly affected by salicylic acid at 5%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The potassium sulphate by sampling stage interaction significantly affected grape bud proline content.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- potassium sulphate × stages of samplinge0
- Outcome
- proline content of grape budse1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“potassium sulphate × stages of sampling and salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling at the level of 1%”
e1“The proline content of grape buds was significantly affected by salicylic acid at 5%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The three way interaction significantly affected grape bud proline content.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of samplinge0
- Outcome
- proline content of grape budse1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“salicylic acid × potassium sulphate × stages of sampling at the level of 1%”
e1“The proline content of grape buds was significantly affected by salicylic acid at 5%”
t0“GRAPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing salicylic acid and potassium sulphate together increased bud soluble sugars, protein and proline.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- salicylic acid and potassium sulphate and their interactione0
- Outcome
- soluble sugars, protein and proline of budse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Increase in the amount of salicylic acid and potassium sulphate and their interaction caused a significant effect on the increase in the amount of soluble sugars, protein and proline of buds”
t0“GRAPE”
The same questions in other papers
potassium sulfate · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.