Paper · 2017 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Performance of Fenugreek (Trigonell foenum-graecum L.) as influenced by micro irrigation under different planting patterns

Sangita Meena; A. C. Shivran; P. K. Boori; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment conducted at Agronomy farm, S.K.N. College of agriculture, Jobner during rabi season 2013-14to select appropriate drip irrigation schedule for maximizing productivity and profitability of fenugreek. The experiment consisted nine treatments of irrigation levels and planting pattern viz. Surface irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio with normal row planting, drip irrigation at 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 IW/CPE ratio with normal as well as paired row planting. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The results showed that drip irrigation at different IW/CPE ratios, except drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting, significantly increased growth parameters, yield attributes and yields over surface irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio (control). The results further revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting, being at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio in normal row planting, drip irrigation at 0.8 and 1.0 IW/CPE ratios in normal and paired row planting, recorded significantly higher plant height and dry matter accumulation per metre row length at 40, 80 DAS and at harvest, number of total and effective root nodules and pods per plant (28.72) over drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting. Results further revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting, being at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio in normal row planting, 0.4 IW/CPE ratio in paired row planting, 0.8 and 1.0 IW/CPE ratios with normal and paired row planting, recorded significantly higher seeds per pod, pod length and N content in straw over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal row planting. The further examination of data indicated that the irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio 0.8 with paired row planting, being at par with 0.8 IW/CPE ratio in normal row planting and 1.0 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting, recorded significantly increased number of branches per plant and total chlorophyll content over drip irrigation at 0.4 and 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting. Results further revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting, being at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio in normal row planting, 0.4 IW/CPE ratio in paired row planting, 0.8 and 1.0 IW/CPE ratios with normal and paired row planting, recorded significantly higher seeds per pod and pod length over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal row planting. Application of drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting proved to be best treatment in terms of growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most drip irrigation treatments significantly increased growth parameters over surface irrigation control.

Treatment
drip irrigation at different IW/CPE ratiose1
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
except drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row plantinge1
Comparator
surface irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratioe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip irrigation at different IW/CPE ratios, except drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting, significantly increased growth parameters, yield attributes and yields over surface irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most drip irrigation treatments significantly increased yield attributes and yields over surface irrigation control.

Treatment
drip irrigation at different IW/CPE ratiose1
Outcome
yield attributes and yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
except drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row plantinge1
Comparator
surface irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratioe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip irrigation at different IW/CPE ratios, except drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting, significantly increased growth parameters, yield attributes and yields over surface irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE with paired rows significantly increased plant height and dry matter accumulation relative to 0.4 IW/CPE with either row pattern.

Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row plantinge1
Outcome
plant height and dry matter accumulation per metre row lengthe2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
at 40, 80 DAS and at harveste2
Comparator
drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results further revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–923 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded significantly higher plant height and dry matter accumulation per metre row length at 40, 80 DAS and at harvest, number of total and effective root nodules and pods per plant (28.72) over drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.6 IW/CPE paired-row treatment significantly increased total and effective root nodules relative to 0.4 IW/CPE treatments.

Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row plantinge1
Outcome
number of total and effective root nodulese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results further revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–923 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded significantly higher plant height and dry matter accumulation per metre row length at 40, 80 DAS and at harvest, number of total and effective root nodules and pods per plant (28.72) over drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.6 IW/CPE paired-row treatment gave significantly more pods per plant, 28.72, than 0.4 IW/CPE treatments.

Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row plantinge1
Outcome
pods per plante2
Direction
highere3
Value
28.72e2
Comparator
drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results further revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–923 · show in text ↑
e2

“pods per plant (28.72) over drip irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1332 · show in text ↑
e3

“recorded significantly higher plant height and dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.8 IW/CPE paired-row treatment significantly increased branches per plant over 0.4 and 0.6 IW/CPE treatments.

Treatment
irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio 0.8 with paired row plantinge1
Outcome
number of branches per plante2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
drip irrigation at 0.4 and 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio 0.8 with paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1829 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded significantly increased number of branches per plant and total chlorophyll content over drip irrigation at 0.4 and 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.8 IW/CPE paired-row treatment significantly increased total chlorophyll content over 0.4 and 0.6 IW/CPE treatments.

Treatment
irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio 0.8 with paired row plantinge1
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
drip irrigation at 0.4 and 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio 0.8 with paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1829 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded significantly increased number of branches per plant and total chlorophyll content over drip irrigation at 0.4 and 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with normal and paired row planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2123 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE with paired rows was judged the best treatment for growth and yield.

Outcome
drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row plantinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–218 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of drip irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE ratio with paired row planting proved to be best treatment in terms of growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2491–2623 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · symbiosis · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.