Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Influence of irrigation and weed management practices on nodulation and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)

Naresh Kumar Sharma; SL Mundra

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted in Rabi season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 at MPUAT, Udaipur to study effect of irrigation and weed management practices on nodulation and yield of fenugreek. The experiment consisting of four levels of irrigation (0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 IW/CPE ratios) in main plot and four weed control treatments (weedy check, pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DAS, imazethapyr 0.075 kg ha-1 fb one hand weeding 40 DAS and two hand weeding 20 and 40 DAS) in sub plots was laid in split plot design with four replications. Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio gave significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40, 60 and 75 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content in fresh leaf at 60 and75 DAS as well as seed, straw and biological yields over 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE ratio. Significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40 and 60 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content, higher seed yield, straw yield and biological yield were recorded with pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DAS followed by two hand weeding which were statistically at par with each other in this regard.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight than 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE.

Treatment
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
number of nodules per plant and their dry weighte0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
40, 60 and 75 DASe0
Comparator
0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio gave significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40, 60 and 75 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content in fresh leaf at 60 and75 DAS as well as seed, straw and biological yields over 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave more leaf chlorophyll content in fresh leaf than 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE.

Treatment
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content in fresh leafe0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
60 and75 DASe0
Comparator
0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio gave significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40, 60 and 75 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content in fresh leaf at 60 and75 DAS as well as seed, straw and biological yields over 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave more seed, straw and biological yields than 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE.

Treatment
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
seed, straw and biological yieldse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio gave significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40, 60 and 75 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content in fresh leaf at 60 and75 DAS as well as seed, straw and biological yields over 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus hand weeding gave more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight than the other weed-management treatments.

Treatment
pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DASe0
Outcome
number of nodules per plant and their dry weighte0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40 and 60 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content, higher seed yield, straw yield and biological yield were recorded with pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DAS followed by two hand weeding which were statistically at par with each other in this regard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus hand weeding gave more leaf chlorophyll content than the other weed-management treatments.

Treatment
pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DASe0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40 and 60 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content, higher seed yield, straw yield and biological yield were recorded with pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DAS followed by two hand weeding which were statistically at par with each other in this regard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus hand weeding gave more seed yield, straw yield and biological yield than the other weed-management treatments.

Treatment
pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DASe0
Outcome
seed yield, straw yield and biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40 and 60 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content, higher seed yield, straw yield and biological yield were recorded with pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DAS followed by two hand weeding which were statistically at par with each other in this regard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings were statistically at par with the herbicide plus hand-weeding treatment for the reported nodulation, chlorophyll and yield results.

Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Direction
statistically at pare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more number of nodules per plant and their dry weight at 40 and 60 DAS and leaf chlorophyll content, higher seed yield, straw yield and biological yield were recorded with pre emergence application of pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 0.75 kg ha-1 in conjugation with one hand weeding 40 DAS followed by two hand weeding which were statistically at par with each other in this regard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–120 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · symbiosis · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

herbicide · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · physiology: pigments · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · symbiosis · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.