Paper · 2018 · Journal of Ecology and Environment

Effects of elevated CO2 concentration and increased temperature on leaf quality responses of rare and endangered plants

Heon-Mo Jeong; Hae-Ran Kim; Seungbum Hong; et al.

19
claims
36
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the study, the effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on the nitrogen content, carbon content, and C:N ratio of seven rare and endangered species (Quercus gilva, Hibiscus hambo, Paliurus ramosissimus, Cicuta virosa, Bupleurum latissimum, Viola raddeana, and Iris dichotoma) were examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years (May 2008 and June 2011). Elevated CO2 concentration and temperature result in a decline in leaf nitrogen content for three woody species in May 2009 and June 2011, while four herb species showed different responses to each other. The nitrogen content of B. latissimum and I. dichotoma decreased under treatment in either 2009 and 2011. The leaf nitrogen content of C. virosa and V. raddeana was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature in 2009, but that of C. virosa increased and that V. raddeana decreased under the treatment in 2011. In 2009, it was found that there was no difference in carbon content in the leaves of the six species except for that of P. ramosissimus. On the other hand, while there was no difference in carbon content in the leaves of Q. gilva in the control and treatment in 2011, carbon content in the leaves of the remaining six species increased due to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature. The C:N ratio in the leaf of C. virosa grown in the treatment was lower in both 2009 and 2011 than that in the control. The C:N ratio in the leaf of V. raddeana decreased by 16.4% from the previous year, but increased by 28.9% in 2011. For the other five species, C:N ratios increased both in 2009 and 2011. In 2009 and 2011, chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Q. gilva and H. hamabo were higher in the treatment than those in the control. In the case of P. ramosissimus, the ratio was higher in the treatment than that in the control in 2009, but in 2011, the result was the opposite. Among four herb species, the chlorophyll contents in the leaves of C. virosa, V. raddeana, and I. dichotoma did not show any difference between gradients in 2009, but decreased due to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature in 2011. Leaf nitrogen and carbon contents, C:N ratio, and chlorophyll contents in the leaves of seven rare and endangered species of plant were found to be influenced by the rise and duration of CO2 concentration and temperature, species, and interaction among those factors. The findings above seem to show that long-term rise of CO2 concentration, and temperature causes changes in physiological responses of rare and endangered species of plant and the responses may be species-specific. In particular, woody species seem to be more sensitive to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature than herb species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature decreased leaf nitrogen content in three woody species in May 2009 and June 2011.

Taxon
three woody speciese2
Treatment
Elevated CO2 concentration and temperaturee2
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente2
Direction
declinee2
Qualifier
May 2009 and June 2011e2
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 concentration and temperature result in a decline in leaf nitrogen content for three woody species in May 2009 and June 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature decreased leaf nitrogen content of B. latissimum and I. dichotoma under treatment in 2009 and 2011.

Taxon
B. latissimum and I. dichotomaIris dichotomaBupleurum latissimume2
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
nitrogen contente2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
in either 2009 and 2011e2
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris dichotoma
Iris dichotoma · Taxonpeganum · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“The nitrogen content of B. latissimum and I. dichotoma decreased under treatment in either 2009 and 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature did not significantly affect leaf nitrogen content of C. virosa and V. raddeana in 2009.

Taxon
C. virosa and V. raddeanaCicuta virosaViola raddeanae3
Treatment
elevated CO2 and temperaturee3
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente3
Direction
not significantly affectede3
Qualifier
in 2009e3
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicuta virosa
Cicuta virosa · TaxonЭлеонора Анатольевна · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Viola raddeana
Viola raddeana · TaxonYoshimasa Uchiyama · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The leaf nitrogen content of C. virosa and V. raddeana was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature increased leaf nitrogen content of C. virosa under treatment in 2011.

Taxon
C. virosaCicuta virosae4
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente3
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
in 2011e4
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicuta virosa
Cicuta virosa · TaxonЭлеонора Анатольевна · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The leaf nitrogen content of C. virosa and V. raddeana was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–868 · show in text ↑
e4

“but that of C. virosa increased and that V. raddeana decreased under the treatment in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature decreased leaf nitrogen content of V. raddeana under treatment in 2011.

Taxon
V. raddeanaViola raddeanae4
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente3
Direction
decreasede4
Qualifier
in 2011e4
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola raddeana
Viola raddeana · TaxonYoshimasa Uchiyama · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e3

“The leaf nitrogen content of C. virosa and V. raddeana was not significantly affected by elevated CO2 and temperature in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–868 · show in text ↑
e4

“but that of C. virosa increased and that V. raddeana decreased under the treatment in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature did not change leaf carbon content in 2009 in the six species other than P. ramosissimus.

Taxon
the six speciese5
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
carbon contente5
Direction
no differencee5
Qualifier
except for that of P. ramosissimuse5
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 2009, it was found that there was no difference in carbon content in the leaves of the six species except for that of P. ramosissimus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature did not change leaf carbon content of Q. gilva in 2011.

Taxon
Q. gilvaQuercus gilvae6
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
carbon contente6
Direction
no differencee6
Qualifier
in 2011e6
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus gilva
Quercus gilva · TaxonGiveMeMollusks · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e6

“while there was no difference in carbon content in the leaves of Q. gilva in the control and treatment in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rising CO2 concentration and temperature increased leaf carbon content of the remaining six species in 2011.

Taxon
remaining six speciese7
Treatment
rise of CO2 concentration and temperaturee7
Outcome
carbon contente7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e7

“carbon content in the leaves of the remaining six species increased due to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature lowered the leaf C:N ratio of C. virosa in both 2009 and 2011.

Taxon
C. virosaCicuta virosae1
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
C:N ratioe1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
in both 2009 and 2011e1
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicuta virosa
Cicuta virosa · TaxonЭлеонора Анатольевна · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“The C:N ratio in the leaf of C. virosa grown in the treatment was lower in both 2009 and 2011 than that in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1471 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leaf C:N ratio of V. raddeana decreased by 16.4% from the previous year.

Taxon
V. raddeanaViola raddeanae1
Outcome
C:N ratioe1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
16.4%e1
Comparator
from the previous yeare1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola raddeana
Viola raddeana · TaxonYoshimasa Uchiyama · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The C:N ratio in the leaf of V. raddeana decreased by 16.4% from the previous year, but increased by 28.9% in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leaf C:N ratio of V. raddeana increased by 28.9% in 2011.

Taxon
V. raddeanaViola raddeanae1
Outcome
C:N ratioe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
28.9%e1
Qualifier
in 2011e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola raddeana
Viola raddeana · TaxonYoshimasa Uchiyama · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The C:N ratio in the leaf of V. raddeana decreased by 16.4% from the previous year, but increased by 28.9% in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature increased the C:N ratios of the other five species in 2009 and 2011.

Taxon
other five speciese1
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
C:N ratiose1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
both in 2009 and 2011e1
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“For the other five species, C:N ratios increased both in 2009 and 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature raised leaf chlorophyll contents of Q. gilva and H. hamabo in 2009 and 2011.

Taxon
Q. gilva and H. hamaboQuercus gilvaTalipariti hamaboe1
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
In 2009 and 2011e1
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus gilva
Quercus gilva · TaxonGiveMeMollusks · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Talipariti hamabo
Talipariti hamabo · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2009 and 2011, chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Q. gilva and H. hamabo were higher in the treatment than those in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature raised the chlorophyll ratio of P. ramosissimus in 2009.

Taxon
P. ramosissimusPaliurus ramosissimuse1
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
the ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
in 2009e1
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paliurus ramosissimus
Paliurus ramosissimus · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the case of P. ramosissimus, the ratio was higher in the treatment than that in the control in 2009, but in 2011, the result was the opposite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chlorophyll ratio of P. ramosissimus in the treatment showed the opposite response in 2011.

Taxon
P. ramosissimusPaliurus ramosissimuse1
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
the ratioe1
Direction
the oppositee1
Qualifier
in 2011e1
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paliurus ramosissimus
Paliurus ramosissimus · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the case of P. ramosissimus, the ratio was higher in the treatment than that in the control in 2009, but in 2011, the result was the opposite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature did not change leaf chlorophyll contents of C. virosa, V. raddeana and I. dichotoma in 2009.

Taxon
C. virosa, V. raddeana, and I. dichotomaCicuta virosaIris dichotomaViola raddeanae1
Treatment
elevated CO2 + elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse1
Direction
did not show any differencee1
Qualifier
in 2009e1
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicuta virosa
Cicuta virosa · TaxonЭлеонора Анатольевна · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Iris dichotoma
Iris dichotoma · Taxonpeganum · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Viola raddeana
Viola raddeana · TaxonYoshimasa Uchiyama · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among four herb species, the chlorophyll contents in the leaves of C. virosa, V. raddeana, and I. dichotoma did not show any difference between gradients in 2009, but decreased due to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rising CO2 concentration and temperature decreased leaf chlorophyll contents of C. virosa, V. raddeana and I. dichotoma in 2011.

Taxon
C. virosa, V. raddeana, and I. dichotomaCicuta virosaIris dichotomaViola raddeanae1
Treatment
rise of CO2 concentration and temperaturee1
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
in 2011e1
Comparator
control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicuta virosa
Cicuta virosa · TaxonЭлеонора Анатольевна · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Iris dichotoma
Iris dichotoma · Taxonpeganum · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Viola raddeana
Viola raddeana · TaxonYoshimasa Uchiyama · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“examined under control (ambient CO2 + ambient temperature) and treatment (elevated CO2 + elevated temperature) for 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among four herb species, the chlorophyll contents in the leaves of C. virosa, V. raddeana, and I. dichotoma did not show any difference between gradients in 2009, but decreased due to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2179 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Woody species seem more sensitive than herb species to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature.

Taxon
woody speciese1
Treatment
rise of CO2 concentration and temperaturee1
Outcome
sensitive to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperaturee1
Direction
more sensitivee1
Comparator
herb speciese1

Verbatim

e1

“In particular, woody species seem to be more sensitive to the rise of CO2 concentration and temperature than herb species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2664–2785 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term rise of CO2 concentration and temperature is associated with changes in physiological responses of rare and endangered plant species, which may be species-specific.

Taxon
rare and endangered species of plante1
Treatment
long-term rise of CO2 concentration, and temperaturee1
Outcome
physiological responsese1
Qualifier
the responses may be species-specifice1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The findings above seem to show that long-term rise of CO2 concentration, and temperature causes changes in physiological responses of rare and endangered species of plant and the responses may be species-specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2449–2662 · show in text ↑