Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Irrigation Water Management Research Centre (IWMRC) Belavatgi, Navalgund taluk of Dharwad district under Vertisols during rabi 2013-15 to study the effect of irrigation and hydrogel application on chickpea varieties in Malaprabha Command area. Irrigation effects were non significant, however irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded higher grain yield (2136 kg ha-1) as compared to irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW/CPE (2087 kg ha-1) and 0.4 IW/CPE (2025 kg ha-1). It also recorded significantly higher WUE (13.34 kg/ha mm) over 0.6 IW/CPE (8.15 kg/ha mm). Among the varieties ‘JG-11’ recorded significantly higher grain yields (2309 kg ha-1) over other varieties, however they did not affect the WUE. Interaction effect of irrigation levels and varieties was significant for grain yield and WUE. ‘A-1’, ‘JG-11’ and ‘JAKI-9218’ varieties with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded significantly higher WUE and were on par. ‘JG-11’ variety with 0.6 IW/CPE recorded higher gross returns (Rs. 92660/ha), net returns (Rs. 69800/ha) and B:C ratio (3.05).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation effects on chickpea were not significant.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- Irrigatione1
Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e1“Irrigation effects were non significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel gave higher chickpea grain yield than irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogele2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 2136 kg ha-1e2
- Qualifier
- 2087 kg ha-1e2
- Comparator
- irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW/CPEe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e2“irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded higher grain yield (2136 kg ha-1) as compared to irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW/CPE (2087 kg ha-1) and 0.4 IW/CPE (2025 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel gave higher chickpea grain yield than irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogele2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 2136 kg ha-1e2
- Qualifier
- 2025 kg ha-1e2
- Comparator
- 0.4 IW/CPEe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e2“irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded higher grain yield (2136 kg ha-1) as compared to irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW/CPE (2087 kg ha-1) and 0.4 IW/CPE (2025 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel gave significantly higher chickpea WUE than irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogele2
- Outcome
- WUEe3
- Direction
- significantly highere3
- Value
- 13.34 kg/ha mme3
- Qualifier
- 8.15 kg/ha mme3
- Comparator
- 0.6 IW/CPEe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e2“irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded higher grain yield (2136 kg ha-1) as compared to irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW/CPE (2087 kg ha-1) and 0.4 IW/CPE (2025 kg ha-1)”
e3“It also recorded significantly higher WUE (13.34 kg/ha mm) over 0.6 IW/CPE (8.15 kg/ha mm)”
Claim · model-written summary
JG-11 gave significantly higher chickpea grain yield than the other varieties.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- JG-11e4
- Outcome
- grain yieldse4
- Direction
- significantly highere4
- Value
- 2309 kg ha-1e4
- Comparator
- other varietiese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e4“Among the varieties ‘JG-11’ recorded significantly higher grain yields (2309 kg ha-1) over other varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea varieties did not affect WUE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- varietiese4
- Outcome
- WUEe4
- Direction
- did not affecte4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e4“Among the varieties ‘JG-11’ recorded significantly higher grain yields (2309 kg ha-1) over other varieties, however they did not affect the WUE”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of irrigation levels and varieties was significant for chickpea grain yield and WUE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- varietiese5
- Treatment
- irrigation levelse5
- Outcome
- grain yield and WUEe5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e5“Interaction effect of irrigation levels and varieties was significant for grain yield and WUE”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety A-1 with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel had significantly higher chickpea WUE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- A-1e6
- Treatment
- 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogele6
- Outcome
- WUEe6
- Direction
- significantly highere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e6“‘A-1’, ‘JG-11’ and ‘JAKI-9218’ varieties with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded significantly higher WUE and were on par”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety JG-11 with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel had significantly higher chickpea WUE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- JG-11e6
- Treatment
- 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogele6
- Outcome
- WUEe6
- Direction
- significantly highere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e6“‘A-1’, ‘JG-11’ and ‘JAKI-9218’ varieties with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded significantly higher WUE and were on par”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety JAKI-9218 with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel had significantly higher chickpea WUE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- JAKI-9218e6
- Treatment
- 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogele6
- Outcome
- WUEe6
- Direction
- significantly highere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e6“‘A-1’, ‘JG-11’ and ‘JAKI-9218’ varieties with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded significantly higher WUE and were on par”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety JG-11 with 0.6 IW/CPE had higher chickpea gross returns.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- JG-11e7
- Treatment
- 0.6 IW/CPEe7
- Outcome
- gross returnse7
- Direction
- highere7
- Value
- Rs. 92660/hae7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e7“‘JG-11’ variety with 0.6 IW/CPE recorded higher gross returns (Rs. 92660/ha), net returns (Rs. 69800/ha) and B:C ratio (3.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety JG-11 with 0.6 IW/CPE had higher chickpea net returns.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- JG-11e7
- Treatment
- 0.6 IW/CPEe7
- Outcome
- net returnse7
- Direction
- highere7
- Value
- Rs. 69800/hae7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e7“‘JG-11’ variety with 0.6 IW/CPE recorded higher gross returns (Rs. 92660/ha), net returns (Rs. 69800/ha) and B:C ratio (3.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety JG-11 with 0.6 IW/CPE had a higher chickpea B:C ratio.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- JG-11e7
- Treatment
- 0.6 IW/CPEe7
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe7
- Direction
- highere7
- Value
- 3.05e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chickpea varieties”
e7“‘JG-11’ variety with 0.6 IW/CPE recorded higher gross returns (Rs. 92660/ha), net returns (Rs. 69800/ha) and B:C ratio (3.05)”
The same questions in other papers
other · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →other · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.