Paper · 2018 · Crop and Pasture Science

Phenotypic and metabolic variation among spring Brassica napus genotypes during heat stress

C. B. Koscielny; J. Hazebroek; R. W. Duncan

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Heat stress can frequently limit the yield of Brassica napus L. grown in Canada because of the often unavoidable concurrence of high temperatures and flowering. Ten B. napus inbred genotypes, an open-pollinated B. napus commercial cultivar and a B. juncea genotype were grown in a greenhouse and subjected to two temperature regimes in a growth chamber for 14 days during flowering: control 22°C/10°C and high 31°C/14°C (day/night). Floral buds were sampled at the end of the 14-day treatments, and an untargeted metabolomic assessment was completed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Flower duration, number of flowers, number of pods, biomass, number of seeds and seed weight were recorded. Yield was reduced by 55% in the heat treatment during winter and by 41% during the subsequent autumn experimental run. Of the 12 genotypes, five were classified as heat-tolerant and four as heat-susceptible based on the calculated heat susceptibility index across two experiments. In total, 25 metabolic markers were identified that discriminated between the heat-tolerant and -susceptible genotypes exposed to the heat treatment. The variation identified within this set of germplasm has provided evidence that variation exists within B. napus to enable genetic gain for heat tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment reduced yield by 55% in the winter experimental run relative to the control temperature regime.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Organ / stage
floweringe4
Treatment
heat treatmente1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
55%e1
Comparator
control 22°C/10°Ce3
Setting
wintere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat stress can frequently limit the yield of Brassica napus L. grown in Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield was reduced by 55% in the heat treatment during winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–762 · show in text ↑
e3

“control 22°C/10°C and high 31°C/14°C (day/night)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–431 · show in text ↑
e4

“subjected to two temperature regimes in a growth chamber for 14 days during flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the 12 genotypes, five were classified as heat-tolerant and four as heat-susceptible based on the heat susceptibility index across two experiments.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
classified as heat-tolerante5
Qualifier
based on the calculated heat susceptibility index across two experimentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat stress can frequently limit the yield of Brassica napus L. grown in Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“Of the 12 genotypes, five were classified as heat-tolerant and four as heat-susceptible based on the calculated heat susceptibility index across two experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–981 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 metabolic markers discriminated between heat-tolerant and heat-susceptible genotypes exposed to the heat treatment.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
metabolic markerse6
Value
25e6
Qualifier
discriminated between the heat-tolerant and -susceptible genotypes exposed to the heat treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat stress can frequently limit the yield of Brassica napus L. grown in Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“In total, 25 metabolic markers were identified that discriminated between the heat-tolerant and -susceptible genotypes exposed to the heat treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The variation identified in this germplasm indicates that genetic variation exists within B. napus for heat tolerance, enabling genetic gain.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse7
Outcome
variation exists within B. napuse7
Qualifier
to enable genetic gain for heat tolerancee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The variation identified within this set of germplasm has provided evidence that variation exists within B. napus to enable genetic gain for heat tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1288 · show in text ↑

heat · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 3 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.