Paper · 2018 · Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia

Genotype, Row Spacing and Environment Interaction for Productivity and Grain Quality of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in sub-tropical Australia

Rao C.N.Rachaputi; Guta Motuma Bedane; Ian James Broad; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) is grown between the 45oN and 45oS as a summer food legume, and consumed by billions of people in the world. Recent renewed interest from Australian growers prompted the current study to evaluate high-yielding varieties and develop agronomic parameters for this crop. Performance of four selected pigeonpea genotypes were assessed under three row spacing (25, 50 and 100 cm) treatments and at one plant density (30 plants/m2) in two diverse Australian environments (Kingaroy and Gatton) in Queensland. Decreasing row spacing from 100cm to 25cm led to a linear increase in mean shoot dry matter (DM) at both sites. However, maximum grain yields of up to 2.9 t/ha were achieved at 50cm row spacing but the yields declined at 25cm spacing at both sites. Genotypic variation for radiation use efficiency (RUE) measured at Gatton site ranged from 1.40 to 1.76 g/MJ, which accounted for 76% of variation in DM. There was a significant effect of site and genotype on grain N and 100-seed mass. The study demonstrated that pigeonpea could be grown as a legume break crop in subtropical Australia, with potential export market opportunities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing row spacing from 100cm to 25cm linearly increased shoot dry matter at both sites.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
25cme0
Outcome
mean shoot dry matter (DM)e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
100cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing row spacing from 100cm to 25cm led to a linear increase in mean shoot dry matter (DM) at both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield peaked at 50cm row spacing, reaching 2.9 t/ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
50cm row spacinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.9 t/hae0
Comparator
25cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum grain yields of up to 2.9 t/ha were achieved at 50cm row spacing but the yields declined at 25cm spacing at both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield declined at 25cm spacing at both sites relative to 50cm.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
25cm spacinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
50cm row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum grain yields of up to 2.9 t/ha were achieved at 50cm row spacing but the yields declined at 25cm spacing at both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic radiation use efficiency at Gatton ranged from 1.40 to 1.76 g/MJ.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
radiation use efficiency (RUE)e0
Value
1.40 to 1.76 g/MJe0
Setting
Gattone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypic variation for radiation use efficiency (RUE) measured at Gatton site ranged from 1.40 to 1.76 g/MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency accounted for 76% of dry matter variation.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
variation in DMe0
Value
76%e0
Setting
Gattone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypic variation for radiation use efficiency (RUE) measured at Gatton site ranged from 1.40 to 1.76 g/MJ, which accounted for 76% of variation in DM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Site and genotype significantly affected grain nitrogen.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
genotypee0
Outcome
grain Ne0
Setting
sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant effect of site and genotype on grain N and 100-seed mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Site and genotype significantly affected 100-seed mass.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
genotypee0
Outcome
100-seed masse0
Setting
sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant effect of site and genotype on grain N and 100-seed mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded pigeonpea could serve as a subtropical Australian break crop.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
grown as a legume break crope0
Setting
subtropical Australiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study demonstrated that pigeonpea could be grown as a legume break crop in subtropical Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1117 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.