Paper · 2017 · Egyptian Journal of Horticulture

Impact of Biochar Addition on Productivity and Tubers Quality of Some Potato Cultivars Under Sandy Soil Conditions

Mohammad Youssef; I.A.S. Al-Easily; Dalia A.S. Nawar

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

THE PRESENT study was carried out during the two summer seasons of 2016 and 2017 to study the effect of biochar application rates (0, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 m3/feddan (fed.) = 4200 m2) on productivity and tubers quality of three potato cultivars i.e., Accent, Cara and Spunta grown under sandy soil conditions. Cara and Spunta cultivars recorded the highest values of morphological traits, leaf content of Ca, Mn and Cu, as well as tuber yield and quality. Cara cultivar recorded the maximum dry weight of different plant parts, while Spunta cv. recorded the highest values of photosynthetic pigments concentrations in the leaf tissues and the highest tuber starch content. Accent cv. recoded the lowest values of the last mentioned parameters and the lowest tuber nitrate content. Plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments and minerals content (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), yield and its components, as well as tuber quality were significantly increased with increasing biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed. Treated the three tested potato cultivars plants with different application rates of biochar increased plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments, minerals content and tuber yield and its components, compared to those untreated with biochar. Adding biochar at rates of 2.5 or 5 m3/fed. to the three tested potato cultivars Considerably gave the lowest values of leaf nitrate content. Treating Cara cultivars with biochar at rate of 5 m3/fed. gave the highest values of gross and net return, as well as benefits ratio, followed by adding 5 m3/fed. to Spunta plants. Finally, adding biochar to potato plants grown in sandy soil conditions obviously improves potato plant growth, plant chemical compositions, tuber yield and its components, with good tubers quality and increasing net return of potato production and keeps the environment less polluted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cara and Spunta had the highest morphological traits, leaf mineral content, tuber yield and quality.

Material
Cara and Spunta cultivarse0
Outcome
morphological traits, leaf content of Ca, Mn and Cu, as well as tuber yield and qualitye0
Direction
highest valuese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cara and Spunta cultivars recorded the highest values of morphological traits, leaf content of Ca, Mn and Cu, as well as tuber yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cara had maximum dry weight of plant parts.

Material
Carae0
Outcome
dry weight of different plant partse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cara cultivar recorded the maximum dry weight of different plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spunta had the highest leaf photosynthetic pigment concentration.

Material
Spuntae0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Spunta cv. recorded the highest values of photosynthetic pigments concentrations in the leaf tissues and the highest tuber starch content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spunta had the highest tuber starch content.

Material
Spuntae0
Outcome
tuber starch contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Spunta cv. recorded the highest values of photosynthetic pigments concentrations in the leaf tissues and the highest tuber starch content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accent had the lowest pigment and starch parameters.

Material
Accente0
Outcome
last mentioned parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Accent cv. recoded the lowest values of the last mentioned parameters and the lowest tuber nitrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–774 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accent had the lowest tuber nitrate content.

Material
Accente0
Outcome
tuber nitrate contente0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Accent cv. recoded the lowest values of the last mentioned parameters and the lowest tuber nitrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing biochar to 5 m3/fed significantly raised plant growth.

Treatment
biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.e0
Outcome
Plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments and minerals content (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), yield and its components, as well as tuber quality were significantly increased with increasing biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing biochar to 5 m3/fed significantly raised leaf photosynthetic pigments and minerals.

Treatment
biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.e0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic pigments and minerals content (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments and minerals content (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), yield and its components, as well as tuber quality were significantly increased with increasing biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing biochar to 5 m3/fed significantly raised yield and components.

Treatment
biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.e0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments and minerals content (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), yield and its components, as well as tuber quality were significantly increased with increasing biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing biochar to 5 m3/fed significantly raised tuber quality.

Treatment
biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.e0
Outcome
tuber qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments and minerals content (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), yield and its components, as well as tuber quality were significantly increased with increasing biochar application rates up to 5 m3/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased growth, pigments, mineral content and tuber yield versus no biochar.

Treatment
different application rates of biochare0
Outcome
plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments, minerals content and tuber yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
those untreated with biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated the three tested potato cultivars plants with different application rates of biochar increased plant growth, leaf photosynthetic pigments, minerals content and tuber yield and its components, compared to those untreated with biochar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 2.5 or 5 m3/fed gave lowest leaf nitrate.

Treatment
biochar at rates of 2.5 or 5 m3/fed.e0
Outcome
leaf nitrate contente0
Direction
lowest valuese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding biochar at rates of 2.5 or 5 m3/fed. to the three tested potato cultivars Considerably gave the lowest values of leaf nitrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1395 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cara with 5 m3/fed biochar gave highest gross and net returns and benefit ratio.

Material
Carae0
Treatment
biochar at rate of 5 m3/fed.e0
Outcome
gross and net return, as well as benefits ratioe0
Direction
highest valuese0
Comparator
Spuntae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Treating Cara cultivars with biochar at rate of 5 m3/fed. gave the highest values of gross and net return, as well as benefits ratio, followed by adding 5 m3/fed. to Spunta plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1576 · show in text ↑

biochar · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

biochar · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

biochar · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.