Paper · 1989 · Weed Technology

Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays) as Affected by Till-Plant Systems and Herbicides

Edward E. Schweizer; Robert L. Zimdahl; Rome H. Mickelson

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The impact of three till-plant and two weed management systems on weed seed reserves of soil, yearly weed problems, and corn production was assessed under center-pivot irrigation for 3 consecutive years. Annual weeds were controlled in disced, bedded, and strip rotary till-plant systems with a moderate or intensive level of herbicides. Weed seed of seven annual weed species were identified, with common lambsquarters and stinkgrass, comprising 45 and 41%, respectively, of the initial 305 million seed/ha in the upper 25 cm of the soil profile. After the third cropping year, overall decline in total seed number in soil was 45% when averaged over till-plant and weed management systems. Grain yields did not differ between weed management systems, but the disced till-plant system produced 16% less grain than the bedded and strip rotary till-plant systems over 2 yr.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate or intensive herbicide levels controlled annual weeds across disced, bedded and strip rotary systems.

Treatment
a moderate or intensive level of herbicidese0
Interactor
Annual weedse0weed
Outcome
Annual weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual weeds were controlled in disced, bedded, and strip rotary till-plant systems with a moderate or intensive level of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common lambsquarters made up 45% of initial soil weed seed reserves.

Taxon
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0
Outcome
initial 305 million seed/hae0
Value
45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common lambsquarters and stinkgrass, comprising 45 and 41%, respectively, of the initial 305 million seed/ha in the upper 25 cm of the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stinkgrass made up 41% of initial soil weed seed reserves.

Outcome
initial 305 million seed/hae0
Value
41%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis cilianensis
Eragrostis cilianensis · TaxonKevin Faccenda · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common lambsquarters and stinkgrass, comprising 45 and 41%, respectively, of the initial 305 million seed/ha in the upper 25 cm of the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soil weed seed number declined by 45% after three cropping years, averaged across systems.

Outcome
total seed number in soile0
Direction
declinee0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“After the third cropping year, overall decline in total seed number in soil was 45% when averaged over till-plant and weed management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield did not differ between weed-management systems.

Treatment
weed management systemse0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
weed management systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields did not differ between weed management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disced till-plant system yielded 16% less corn grain than bedded and strip rotary systems over two years.

Treatment
disced till-plant systeme0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
lesse0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
bedded and strip rotary till-plant systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the disced till-plant system produced 16% less grain than the bedded and strip rotary till-plant systems over 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–31 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 110 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.