Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effects of runoff harvesting through semi-circular bund on some soil characteristics

Mosayeb Heshmati; Mohammad Gheitury; M. Hosseini

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, to investigate the effects of runoff harvesting on soil properties in the semiarid forest, runoff harvesting through semi-circular bund was considered as a method to conserve soil and thereby combat tree mortality. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, runoff was harvested through the semi-circular bund affecting soil quality and moisture storage. The selected forest site is located in Kalehzard, Kermanshah, in Zagros region of western Iran. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with four treatment plots: bund with protection, protection treatment, bund without protection and control treatment. The results showed that the mean values of soil organic carbon in the bund with protection, protection treatment, bund without protection and control treatment were 2.35, 2.40, 1.90, and 1.80%, respectively, indicating no significant difference among them in the first year, while there were significant (p> 0.05) increases in the bund with protection and protection treatment after three years. Furthermore, coarse and very coarse soil aggregates increased significantly in the bund with protection treatment. This treatment also attributed to significant reduction in soil bulk density from 1.46 (in the first year) to 1.32 (in the third year), which enhanced soil moisture content. Finally it was found that bunds with protection significantly curtail dieback and adverse re-growing of stands due to the coupled effects of bund building and protection to curtail forest mortality in the semi-arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon did not significantly differ among four treatments in year one.

Treatment
bund with protection, protection treatment, bund without protection and control treatmente0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Value
2.35, 2.40, 1.90, and 1.80%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“soil organic carbon in the bund with protection, protection treatment, bund without protection and control treatment were 2.35, 2.40, 1.90, and 1.80%, respectively, indicating no significant difference among them in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“the semiarid forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon increased in bund with protection and protection treatments after three years, with inconsistent reported significance notation.

Treatment
bund with protection and protection treatmente0
Outcome
soil organic carbone1
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
after three yearse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significant (p> 0.05) increases in the bund with protection and protection treatment after three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil organic carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bund with protection significantly increased coarse and very coarse soil aggregates.

Treatment
bund with protection treatmente0
Outcome
coarse and very coarse soil aggregatese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“coarse and very coarse soil aggregates increased significantly in the bund with protection treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bund with protection reduced soil bulk density from 1.46 to 1.32 by year three.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
1.32e0
Qualifier
1.46e0
Comparator
in the first yeare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also attributed to significant reduction in soil bulk density from 1.46 (in the first year) to 1.32 (in the third year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1278 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced soil bulk density enhanced soil moisture content.

Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
reduction in soil bulk densitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“significant reduction in soil bulk density from 1.46 (in the first year) to 1.32 (in the third year), which enhanced soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunds with protection significantly curtailed forest stand dieback and adverse regrowth.

Treatment
bunds with protectione0
Outcome
dieback and adverse re-growing of standse0
Direction
curtaile0
Setting
semi-arid regionse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bunds with protection significantly curtail dieback and adverse re-growing of stands due to the coupled effects of bund building and protection to curtail forest mortality in the semi-arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1540 · show in text ↑