Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Biofertilizer and Auxin on Growth and Rooting of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings

Abdul Hakim; S. Jaganath; M.K. Honnabyraiah; et al.

16
claims
62
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Studies on the influence of bio-fertilizers and auxin on growth and rooting of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cuttings cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby was conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016. The results revealed that the early sprouting of cuttings (8.60 and 7.80 days), number of cutting sprouted (18.33 and 17.67), length of longest shoot (39.73 and 41.53 cm), number of leaves (41.67 and 44.60), fresh weight of shoots (10.80 and 12.60 g), dry weight of shoots (5.80 and 6.60 g), number of primary roots (11.67 and 10.73), number of secondary roots (58.60 and 54.67), root length (27.60 and 25.80 cm), fresh weight of roots (2.56 and 2.75 g) dry weight of roots (1.62 and 1.85 g) were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6). While, number of sprout (3.07), diameter of sprouts (3.16 mm), recorded maximum with treatment (T6), in cv. Ruby and maximum number of sprout (2.80), diameter of sprouts (3.07 mm) were recorded significantly higher in cv. Bhagwa with treatment IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + PSB + PGPR, (T10). Whereas, all the above mentioned parameters were significantly reduced in control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sprouting of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (8.60 and 7.80 days) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
early sprouting of cuttingse1
Direction
maximume2
Value
8.60 and 7.80 dayse1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sprouting of cuttings (8.60 and 7.80 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–315 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of sprouted cuttings of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (18.33 and 17.67) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
number of cutting sproutede1
Direction
maximume2
Value
18.33 and 17.67e1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of cutting sprouted (18.33 and 17.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–361 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Length of longest shoot of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (39.73 and 41.53 cm) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
length of longest shoote1
Direction
maximume2
Value
39.73 and 41.53 cme1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“length of longest shoot (39.73 and 41.53 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–407 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of leaves of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (41.67 and 44.60) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
number of leavese1
Direction
maximume2
Value
41.67 and 44.60e1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of leaves (41.67 and 44.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–443 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight of shoots of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (10.80 and 12.60 g) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
fresh weight of shootse1
Direction
maximume2
Value
10.80 and 12.60 ge1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh weight of shoots (10.80 and 12.60 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight of shoots of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (5.80 and 6.60 g) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
dry weight of shootse1
Direction
maximume2
Value
5.80 and 6.60 ge1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry weight of shoots (5.80 and 6.60 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–527 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of primary roots of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (11.67 and 10.73) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
number of primary rootse1
Direction
maximume2
Value
11.67 and 10.73e1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of primary roots (11.67 and 10.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of secondary roots of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (58.60 and 54.67) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
number of secondary rootse1
Direction
maximume2
Value
58.60 and 54.67e1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of secondary roots (58.60 and 54.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–615 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (27.60 and 25.80 cm) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
maximume2
Value
27.60 and 25.80 cme1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length (27.60 and 25.80 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–649 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight of roots of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (2.56 and 2.75 g) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
fresh weight of rootse1
Direction
maximume2
Value
2.56 and 2.75 ge1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh weight of roots (2.56 and 2.75 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight of roots of pomegranate cuttings was significantly maximum for cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby (1.62 and 1.85 g) with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Bhagwa and Rubye2
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
dry weight of rootse1
Direction
maximume2
Value
1.62 and 1.85 ge1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry weight of roots (1.62 and 1.85 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cv. Ruby, the number of sprouts (3.07) was maximum with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye1
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
number of sproute1
Direction
maximume1
Value
3.07e1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of sprout (3.07), diameter of sprouts (3.16 mm), recorded maximum with treatment (T6), in cv. Ruby”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–996 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cv. Ruby, the sprout diameter (3.16 mm) was maximum with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix (T6).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Rubye1
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
diameter of sproutse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
3.16 mme1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of sprout (3.07), diameter of sprouts (3.16 mm), recorded maximum with treatment (T6), in cv. Ruby”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–996 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In cv. Bhagwa, the number of sprouts (2.80) was higher with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + PSB + PGPR (T10).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Bhagwae1
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + PSB + PGPRe1
Outcome
number of sproute1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.80e1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum number of sprout (2.80), diameter of sprouts (3.07 mm) were recorded significantly higher in cv. Bhagwa with treatment IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + PSB + PGPR, (T10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1175 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In cv. Bhagwa, the sprout diameter (3.07 mm) was higher with IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + PSB + PGPR (T10).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Bhagwae1
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + PSB + PGPRe1
Outcome
diameter of sproutse1
Direction
highere1
Value
3.07 mme1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum number of sprout (2.80), diameter of sprouts (3.07 mm) were recorded significantly higher in cv. Bhagwa with treatment IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + PSB + PGPR, (T10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1175 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All the above parameters were significantly reduced in the control compared with the treatments.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomixe2
Outcome
all the above mentioned parameterse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
department of fruit science, College of Horticulturee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Whereas, all the above mentioned parameters were significantly reduced in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1258 · show in text ↑
e2

“were recorded significantly maximum value in both the cvs. Bhagwa and Ruby, respectively with application of IBA 1500 ppm + NAA 1500 ppm + Biomix in (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–882 · show in text ↑
e3

“conducted at the department of fruit science, College of Horticulture, B during 2015-2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–235 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

38 papers: 38 positive, 0 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.