Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of single and combined applications of zinc with iron and boron on the contents of “Deveci” pear trees

Serhat Gürel; Haluk Başar

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was conducted to correct the ion of zinc (Zn) deficiencies and to examine the efficiency of foliar Zn application on pear groves along with iron and boron. The treatments consisted of control, soil and foliar applications. Every foliar applied Zn elevated considerably Zn contents of the leaves. But, increases in fruit Zn contents were rather limited as compared to Zn contents of the leaves. It is thought that accumulation of Zn in the fruits was due to movement of Zn from the leaves well-supplied with Zn to the fruits. Therefore, foliar application of Zn should be conducted at least four times at the rate of 0.1% to increase Zn contents in the fruits in terms of human's daily Zn intake. Foliar applications of Zn alone and combined Zn + Fe, Zn + B and Zn + Fe + B applications significantly increased Zn, Fe and B concentrations, respectively, in the pear trees, as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Every foliar Zn application considerably elevated Zn contents of pear leaves.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
foliar applied Zne0
Outcome
Zn contents of the leavese0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Every foliar applied Zn elevated considerably Zn contents of the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increases in fruit Zn contents were rather limited compared with Zn contents of the leaves.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Outcome
fruit Zn contentse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
rather limitede0
Comparator
Zn contents of the leavese0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“increases in fruit Zn contents were rather limited as compared to Zn contents of the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–406 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors think Zn accumulation in the fruits was due to movement of Zn from well-supplied leaves to the fruits.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
accumulation of Zn in the fruitse0
Qualifier
movement of Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“accumulation of Zn in the fruits was due to movement of Zn from the leaves well-supplied with Zn to the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–537 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar Zn application at least four times at the rate of 0.1% to increase Zn contents in the fruits.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Outcome
foliar application of Zn should be conducted at least four times at the rate of 0.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of Zn should be conducted at least four times at the rate of 0.1% to increase Zn contents in the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn alone and combined Zn + Fe, Zn + B and Zn + Fe + B applications significantly increased Zn, Fe and B concentrations, respectively, in the pear trees.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communise0
Treatment
Foliar applications of Zn alone and combined Zn + Fe, Zn + B and Zn + Fe + Be0
Outcome
Zn, Fe and B concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of Zn alone and combined Zn + Fe, Zn + B and Zn + Fe + B applications significantly increased Zn, Fe and B concentrations, respectively, in the pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–884 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.