Abstract
Kolhapur on Entisol, Submontane Zone of Maharashtra during the Kharif seasons of 2014 to 2016 to study the response of finger millet crop to foliar nutrition of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The finger millet was transplanted and fertilized by basal general recommended dose of fertilizer (45 kg N: 22.5 kg P 2 O 5 : 00 kg K 2 O through briquettes) + FYM @ 5 t ha -1 . Foliar spray was applied at 50 days after transplanting. The fertilizers used for spray were urea, di-ammonium phosphate, muriate of potash, complex 19-19-19 and calcium nitrate applied @ 2 % foliar spray while combination treatment of urea, di-ammonium phosphate and muriate of potash @ 0.5 % each was applied to the experimental plots.The findings of the field experiments revealed that the application of foliar spray increased the yields of finger millet crop. The highest yield was recorded by the treatment foliar spray of 19-19-19 @ 2% (22.68 q ha -1 ) over the recommended dose of fertilizer (17.75 q ha -1 ). It was followed by the treatment urea spray applied @ 2 % (20.86 q ha -1 ), DAP @ 2.0 % (19.85 q ha -1 ) and at par with rest of the treatments on foliar nutrition while it was superior over water spray (17.94 q ha -1 ). The similar trend was observed by straw yield of finger millet crop to that of grain yield. The data on plant uptake revealed that the treatment of foliar spray 19-19-19 @ 2% recorded higher uptake of N, P and K as compared to no foliar spray application. The application of foliar spray 19-19-19 @ 2% recorded significantly highest B:C ratio (1.46). The soil analyses after harvest of the crop revealed that the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in the soil after harvest of the crop did not differ amongst the different treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spray increased finger millet yield.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae0 - Treatment
- foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- yields of finger millet crope0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of foliar spray increased the yields of finger millet crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
19-19-19 at 2% gave highest grain yield, 22.68 q ha -1 versus 17.75 q ha -1 under recommended fertilizer.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- foliar spray of 19-19-19 @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 22.68 q ha -1e0
- Qualifier
- 17.75 q ha -1e0
- Comparator
- recommended dose of fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was recorded by the treatment foliar spray of 19-19-19 @ 2% (22.68 q ha -1 ) over the recommended dose of fertilizer (17.75 q ha -1 ).”
t0“finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea at 2% yielded 20.86 q ha -1.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- urea spray applied @ 2 %e0
- Outcome
- urea spraye0
- Value
- 20.86 q ha -1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“urea spray applied @ 2 % (20.86 q ha -1 ), DAP @ 2.0 % (19.85 q ha -1 )”
t0“finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
DAP at 2% yielded 19.85 q ha -1.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- DAP @ 2.0 %e0
- Outcome
- DAPe0
- Value
- 19.85 q ha -1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DAP @ 2.0 % (19.85 q ha -1 )”
t0“finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw yield followed the grain yield trend.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Outcome
- straw yield of finger millet crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The similar trend was observed by straw yield of finger millet crop to that of grain yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
19-19-19 at 2% raised N, P and K uptake compared with no foliar spray.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- foliar spray 19-19-19 @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P and Ke0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no foliar spray applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spray 19-19-19 @ 2% recorded higher uptake of N, P and K as compared to no foliar spray application.”
t0“finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
19-19-19 at 2% gave highest B:C ratio of 1.46.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- foliar spray 19-19-19 @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.46e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spray 19-19-19 @ 2% recorded significantly highest B:C ratio (1.46).”
t0“finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest soil N, P and K content did not differ among foliar treatments.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse0
- Outcome
- nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in the soile0
- Direction
- did not differe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in the soil after harvest of the crop did not differ amongst the different treatments.”
t0“finger millet”
The same questions in other papers
application · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
55 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.