Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake of summer finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

SD Parjane; VB Gedam; RH Shinde; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at Shiroli farm, Regional Sugarcane and Jaggery Research Station, Kolhapur during summer season of 2023 to study the effect of foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake of summer finger millet in a randomized block design with ten treatments replicated thrice. The finger millet is grown in kharif season and it has good response to the fertilizers in this season and also it gives good yield. But the given experiment is undertaken in summer season to check its yield potential and response to water soluble fertilizers in summer season. Also, the present investigation focuses on ability of nutrient uptake by finger millet. The results revealed that among the various treatments, treatment RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest grain and straw yield and highest mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium while among the different foliar sprays the application of 75% RDF (45:23:23 NPK kg ha-1) fb 2% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at tillering (45 DAS) and flowering (60 DAS) stage recorded the highest yield and mean nutrient uptake in grain and straw. The lowest values were observed with the treatment absolute control (water spray) at tillering (45 DAS) and flowering (60 DAS) stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer finger millet, the RDF treatment (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest grain and straw yield among the various treatments.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
various treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“among the various treatments, treatment RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest grain and straw yield and highest mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer finger millet, the RDF treatment (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium among the various treatments.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassiume0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
various treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“among the various treatments, treatment RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest grain and straw yield and highest mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the foliar sprays, 75% RDF followed by 2% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at tillering and flowering recorded the highest yield and mean nutrient uptake in grain and straw of summer finger millet.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
75% RDF (45:23:23 NPK kg ha-1) fb 2% foliar spray of 19:19:19e0
Outcome
yield and mean nutrient uptake in grain and strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
different foliar sprayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“among the different foliar sprays the application of 75% RDF (45:23:23 NPK kg ha-1) fb 2% foliar spray of 19:19:19 at tillering (45 DAS) and flowering (60 DAS) stage recorded the highest yield and mean nutrient uptake in grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The absolute control (water spray) at tillering and flowering gave the lowest values in summer finger millet.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
absolute control (water spray)e0
Outcome
lowest valuese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest values were observed with the treatment absolute control (water spray) at tillering (45 DAS) and flowering (60 DAS) stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1282 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.