Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In summer finger millet, the RDF treatment (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium among the various treatments.

A claim from Effect of foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake of summer finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer finger millet, the RDF treatment (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium among the various treatments.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassiume0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
various treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–110
e0

“among the various treatments, treatment RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1) recorded the highest grain and straw yield and highest mean nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–905

Title

Effect of foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake of summer finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

SD Parjane; VB Gedam; RH Shinde; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i5g.725

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-eaa804b7fb0ac47f79d486b4b02bad768d1c8a8c57ae0298265c3354c7953154 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.