Paper · 2018 · Caraka Tani Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

POTENSI AZOLLA SEBAGAI SUBSTITUSI PUPUK KANDANG PADA BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK

Jauhari Syamsiyah; Bambang Hendro Sunarminto; Mujiyo Mujiyo

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

One of problems faced by farmers in the rice cultivation with organic system is organic fertilizer limited, especially for farmers who do not have livestock. Azolla is one of materials that can be used as organic fertilizer. The aim of the research was to determine whether Azolla (Azolla mycrophylla L.) is able to meet the nutrient needs of some rice varieties on organic rice cultivation. The experiment used factorial complete randomized block design with three factors and three replications. Azolla was spread at days after transplanting and at 25 days after transplanting, 75% of Azolla was incorporated into soil and the rest was left up until rice were harvested. Meanwhile, cow manure was distributed after tillage. The treatment consisted of rice varieties (Mira1, Mentik Wangi and Red and White), Azolla (0 and 2 tons / ha) and manure (0 and 10 tons / ha). The result showed that Azolla did not significantly increase growth and yield of rice, despite it could increase the N uptake 5,4% and P uptake P 17,3% , weight of dry straw, dry grain and 1,000 seeds by 5,86%, 12.7%, 7.37% than without Azolla respectively. Azolla 2 tons/ha with manure 10 tons/ha were able to increase N uptake by 7.6%, the uptake P by 13.7% and the of productive tiller number by 9.88%. From the standpoint of crop yields with organic system, a single use of Azolla has not been able to replace manure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla did not significantly increase rice growth.

Treatment
Azollae0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla did not significantly increase growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla did not significantly increase rice yield.

Treatment
Azollae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla did not significantly increase growth and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla increased rice N uptake by 5,4%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azollae0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5,4%e0
Comparator
without Azollae0

Verbatim

e0

“it could increase the N uptake 5,4% and P uptake P 17,3% , weight of dry straw, dry grain and 1,000 seeds by 5,86%, 12.7%, 7.37% than without Azolla respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla increased rice P uptake by 17,3%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azollae0
Outcome
P uptake Pe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17,3%e0
Comparator
without Azollae0

Verbatim

e0

“it could increase the N uptake 5,4% and P uptake P 17,3% , weight of dry straw, dry grain and 1,000 seeds by 5,86%, 12.7%, 7.37% than without Azolla respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla increased dry straw weight by 5,86%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azollae0
Outcome
weight of dry strawe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5,86%e0
Comparator
without Azollae0

Verbatim

e0

“it could increase the N uptake 5,4% and P uptake P 17,3% , weight of dry straw, dry grain and 1,000 seeds by 5,86%, 12.7%, 7.37% than without Azolla respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla increased dry grain weight by 12.7%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azollae0
Outcome
dry graine0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12.7%e0
Comparator
without Azollae0

Verbatim

e0

“it could increase the N uptake 5,4% and P uptake P 17,3% , weight of dry straw, dry grain and 1,000 seeds by 5,86%, 12.7%, 7.37% than without Azolla respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla increased 1,000-seed weight by 7.37%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azollae0
Outcome
1,000 seedse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.37%e0
Comparator
without Azollae0

Verbatim

e0

“it could increase the N uptake 5,4% and P uptake P 17,3% , weight of dry straw, dry grain and 1,000 seeds by 5,86%, 12.7%, 7.37% than without Azolla respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla plus manure increased N uptake by 7.6%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azolla 2 tons/ha with manure 10 tons/hae0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla 2 tons/ha with manure 10 tons/ha were able to increase N uptake by 7.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla plus manure increased P uptake by 13.7%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azolla 2 tons/ha with manure 10 tons/hae0
Outcome
uptake Pe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla 2 tons/ha with manure 10 tons/ha were able to increase N uptake by 7.6%, the uptake P by 13.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla plus manure increased productive tiller count by 9.88%.

Taxon
PADIt0
Treatment
Azolla 2 tons/ha with manure 10 tons/hae0
Outcome
productive tiller numbere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Azolla 2 tons/ha with manure 10 tons/ha were able to increase N uptake by 7.6%, the uptake P by 13.7% and the of productive tiller number by 9.88%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla alone could not replace manure for organic rice yield.

Taxon
PADIt0
Outcome
a single use of Azolla has not been able to replace manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“a single use of Azolla has not been able to replace manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“BUDIDAYA PADI ORGANIK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑

Azolla · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azolla · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.