Paper · 2018 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Contribution of Nitrogen Fixed by Mung Bean to the Following Wheat Crop

Noshin Ilyas; Fakhra Ambreen; Nazima Batool; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop rotation is a supportive management practice in which legumes greatly improve the growth and yield of subsequent cereal crops, particularly wheat. In this study, effects of mung bean (Vigna radiata)​​ on the yield and quality of grains of following wheat crop were determined. An experiment was carried out with two sets of wheat (Triticum aestivum) crops: one grown following mung bean (Vigna radiata) crop and the other grown after a fallow period. Concentrations of macronutrients, sugar, protein, amino acids, and phytohormones of wheat were determined. The grain protein concentration of wheat was improved if cultivated after mung bean, and nitrogen and other macronutrients of wheat were increased significantly. In case of phytohormone contents in the wheat crop, abscisic acid concentration showed no change, but the concentrations of gibberellin increased significantly by 41% and indole acetic acid by 30% as a result of crop rotation. Sugar content in wheat cultivated after mung bean BRM-318 showed 10% increase and wheat protein content increased by 17% and 20%, respectively. The present study demonstrated that crop rotation simulated yield and improved the nutritional value of wheat grain compared to wheat which followed the fallow period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein concentration of wheat improved when wheat followed mung bean rather than fallow.

Treatment
cultivated after mung beane1
Outcome
grain protein concentratione1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
fallow periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grain protein concentration of wheat was improved if cultivated after mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–646 · show in text ↑
e4

“the other grown after a fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and other macronutrients of wheat increased significantly after mung bean rather than fallow.

Treatment
cultivated after mung beane1
Outcome
nitrogen and other macronutrientse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
fallow periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grain protein concentration of wheat was improved if cultivated after mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–646 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrogen and other macronutrients of wheat were increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–723 · show in text ↑
e4

“the other grown after a fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid concentration in wheat showed no change after mung bean rather than fallow.

Treatment
cultivated after mung beane1
Outcome
abscisic acid concentratione3
Direction
no changee3
Comparator
fallow periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grain protein concentration of wheat was improved if cultivated after mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–646 · show in text ↑
e3

“abscisic acid concentration showed no change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–821 · show in text ↑
e4

“the other grown after a fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin concentration in wheat increased significantly by 41% after mung bean rather than fallow.

Treatment
cultivated after mung beane1
Outcome
concentrations of gibberelline5
Direction
increasede5
Value
41%e5
Comparator
fallow periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grain protein concentration of wheat was improved if cultivated after mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–646 · show in text ↑
e5

“the concentrations of gibberellin increased significantly by 41% and indole acetic acid by 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–921 · show in text ↑
e4

“the other grown after a fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indole acetic acid concentration in wheat increased by 30% after mung bean rather than fallow.

Treatment
cultivated after mung beane1
Outcome
indole acetic acide5
Direction
increasede5
Value
30%e5
Comparator
fallow periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grain protein concentration of wheat was improved if cultivated after mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–646 · show in text ↑
e5

“the concentrations of gibberellin increased significantly by 41% and indole acetic acid by 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–921 · show in text ↑
e4

“the other grown after a fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content in wheat cultivated after mung bean BRM-318 increased by 10%.

Treatment
cultivated after mung bean BRM-318e6
Outcome
Sugar contente6
Direction
increasee6
Value
10%e6
Comparator
fallow periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Sugar content in wheat cultivated after mung bean BRM-318 showed 10% increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1029 · show in text ↑
e4

“the other grown after a fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat protein content increased by 17% and 20% after mung bean rather than fallow.

Treatment
cultivated after mung beane1
Outcome
wheat protein contente7
Direction
increasede7
Value
17% and 20%e7
Qualifier
respectivelye7
Comparator
fallow periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grain protein concentration of wheat was improved if cultivated after mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–646 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat protein content increased by 17% and 20%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1094 · show in text ↑
e4

“the other grown after a fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation improved the nutritional value of wheat grain compared with wheat after fallow.

Treatment
crop rotatione0
Outcome
nutritional value of wheat graine0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
fallow periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop rotation simulated yield and improved the nutritional value of wheat grain compared to wheat which followed the fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation effect on wheat yield relative to fallow is stated only as "simulated yield".

Treatment
crop rotatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
fallow periode0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: Abstract wording "simulated yield" is unclear (possibly "increased yield"); direction left unresolved.

Verbatim

e0

“crop rotation simulated yield and improved the nutritional value of wheat grain compared to wheat which followed the fallow period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1262 · show in text ↑

rotation · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.