Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Stone Characterization, Media Analysis and its Influence on Polyembryonic Rootstocks Germination of Mango (Mangifera indica L.)

G. Nayan Deepak; U. Jeevan; Chandu Singh; et al.

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present investigations was carried out for stone characterization, analyze the physico-chemical properties of media and to identify the best suitable media for germination using different polyembryonic rootstocks of mango during 2012-13 at Regional Horticultural Research and Extension Centre, Bengaluru. The studies revealed that, the significant variation was found in stone attributes (weight, length, breadth, circumference and volume). Based on germination test, the Olour rootstock showed better germination (earliest germination 21.33 days, minimum days for 50 per cent germination 31.78 days, higher germination percentage 43.78% and rate of germination 0.016) in compared to other rootstocks. Further, out of three media, the Cocopeat media showed better physical and chemical properties (pH 7.55, water holding capacity 216.04% and pore space 64.01%) and it was also observed that, cocopeat has been taken less time for germination initiation (20.78 days), 50 per cent of germination (33.67 days), maximum germination (48%) and rate of germination (0.016) compared to other media. Furthermore, the interaction effect between media and rootstock showed significant difference on germination behavior. Therefore, the Olour stones showed significant germination on Cocopeat media; hence the generated information could be utilized by nurseryman for getting maximum germination of rootstocks in a nursery.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango stones varied significantly in weight, length, breadth, circumference and volume.

Outcome
stone attributes (weight, length, breadth, circumference and volume)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant variation was found in stone attributes (weight, length, breadth, circumference and volume)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–443 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olour germinated earliest among rootstocks at 21.33 days.

Material
Oloure0
Outcome
earliest germinatione0
Direction
earlieste0
Value
21.33 dayse0
Comparator
other rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Olour rootstock showed better germination (earliest germination 21.33 days, minimum days for 50 per cent germination 31.78 days, higher germination percentage 43.78% and rate of germination 0.016) in compared to other rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olour reached 50 percent germination fastest among rootstocks in 31.78 days.

Material
Oloure1
Outcome
days for 50 per cent germinatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
31.78 dayse0
Comparator
other rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days for 50 per cent germination 31.78 days, higher germination percentage 43.78% and rate of germination 0.016) in compared to other rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Olour rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olour had a higher germination percentage than other rootstocks, 43.78%.

Material
Oloure1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
43.78%e0
Comparator
other rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher germination percentage 43.78% and rate of germination 0.016) in compared to other rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Olour rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olour had a germination rate of 0.016.

Material
Oloure1
Outcome
rate of germinatione0
Value
0.016e0
Comparator
other rootstockse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of germination 0.016) in compared to other rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Olour rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat medium had pH 7.55.

Treatment
Cocopeat mediae0
Outcome
pHe0
Value
7.55e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocopeat media showed better physical and chemical properties (pH 7.55, water holding capacity 216.04% and pore space 64.01%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat medium had water holding capacity of 216.04%.

Treatment
Cocopeat mediae0
Outcome
water holding capacitye0
Value
216.04%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocopeat media showed better physical and chemical properties (pH 7.55, water holding capacity 216.04% and pore space 64.01%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat medium had pore space of 64.01%.

Treatment
Cocopeat mediae0
Outcome
pore spacee0
Value
64.01%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocopeat media showed better physical and chemical properties (pH 7.55, water holding capacity 216.04% and pore space 64.01%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat had the shortest time to germination initiation among media, 20.78 days.

Treatment
cocopeate0
Outcome
time for germination initiatione0
Direction
less timee0
Value
20.78 dayse0
Comparator
other mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cocopeat has been taken less time for germination initiation (20.78 days), 50 per cent of germination (33.67 days), maximum germination (48%) and rate of germination (0.016) compared to other media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat reached 50 percent germination in 33.67 days versus other media.

Treatment
cocopeate0
Outcome
50 per cent of germinatione0
Value
33.67 dayse0
Comparator
other mediae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cocopeat has been taken less time for germination initiation (20.78 days), 50 per cent of germination (33.67 days), maximum germination (48%) and rate of germination (0.016) compared to other media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat gave the maximum germination percentage among media, 48%.

Treatment
cocopeate0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
48%e0
Comparator
other mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cocopeat has been taken less time for germination initiation (20.78 days), 50 per cent of germination (33.67 days), maximum germination (48%) and rate of germination (0.016) compared to other media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat gave a germination rate of 0.016 versus other media.

Treatment
cocopeate0
Outcome
rate of germinatione0
Value
0.016e0
Comparator
other mediae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cocopeat has been taken less time for germination initiation (20.78 days), 50 per cent of germination (33.67 days), maximum germination (48%) and rate of germination (0.016) compared to other media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium-by-rootstock interaction significantly affected germination behavior.

Material
rootstocke0
Treatment
mediae0
Outcome
germination behaviore0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction effect between media and rootstock showed significant difference on germination behavior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Olour stones showed significant germination in Cocopeat medium.

Material
Oloure0
Treatment
Cocopeat mediae0
Outcome
germinatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Olour stones showed significant germination on Cocopeat media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1290 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Olour stones in Cocopeat for maximum nursery rootstock germination.

Material
Oloure0
Treatment
Cocopeat mediae0
Outcome
maximum germination of rootstocks in a nurserye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Olour stones showed significant germination on Cocopeat media; hence the generated information could be utilized by nurseryman for getting maximum germination of rootstocks in a nursery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1414 · show in text ↑
e1

“rootstocks of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–225 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

in vitro · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.