Paper · 2011 · International Research Journal of Plant Science

Growth of coffee seedlings as influenced by Arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and phosphate fertilizers in two soils in Nigeria

Ibiremo; Daniel Daniel; Oloyede; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A greenhouse study was carried out to evaluate the effect of phosphate fertilizer types and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings in two soil types in Nigeria. The trial was a factorial experiment involving two types of P-fertilizers (Single Super Phosphate and Sokoto Rock Phosphate) and mycorrhizal inoculation. The P-fertilizers were applied at 10kg P205/ha and a control (no-P fertilizer application) while the AMF was applied at two levels (with and without inoculation). The six treatments combinations were applied to two-month old coffee seedlings grown in the two soils (Ibadan and Mambilla). The experiments were laid out in a CRD with three replications and data on growth of coffee and soil parameters were taken for six months. In Mambilla soil, the height and stem diameter of coffee seedlings were significantly (P< 0.05) higher as a result of application of SSP and mycorrhizal inoculation compared with SRP and inoculation or the control. The number of leaves and leaf area were significantly (P< 0.05) improved due to application of SSP and SRP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil while in Ibadan soil, mycorrhizal inoculation resulted in consistent and significant improvement on the stem diameter and leaf area of coffee seedlings. Soil pH and Organic Carbon were not significantly affected by the application of phosphate fertilizer types in both soils. However, the soil available P was significantly (P< 0.05) enhanced in the two soils due to application of SSP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation. Similarly, the root colonization of coffee seedlings at 6 MAT was significantly higher as a result of mycorrhizal inoculation without P-fertilizer application compared with root colonization under SSP application and mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil. The mycorrhizal inoculation with or without Phosphate fertilizer did not significantly affect the colonization of coffee seedling roots in Ibadan soil. SRP had a comparable effect with SSP on the growth of coffee seedlings especially under mycorrhizal inoculation; hence, SRP is a promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sources for coffee seedling production in Nigeria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Mambilla soil, SSP with mycorrhizal inoculation increased coffee seedling height and stem diameter compared with SRP with inoculation or the control.

Taxon
coffee seedlingsCoffeae1
Treatment
application of SSP and mycorrhizal inoculatione1
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
height and stem diametere1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
SRP and inoculation or the controle1
Setting
Mambilla soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“In Mambilla soil, the height and stem diameter of coffee seedlings were significantly (P< 0.05) higher as a result of application of SSP and mycorrhizal inoculation compared with SRP and inoculation or the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP and SRP application improved coffee leaf number and leaf area in Mambilla soil, with or without mycorrhizal inoculation.

Taxon
coffee seedlingsCoffeae0
Treatment
application of SSP and SRPe2
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves and leaf areae2
Direction
improvede2
Setting
Mambilla soile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–172 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of leaves and leaf area were significantly (P< 0.05) improved due to application of SSP and SRP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly improved coffee stem diameter and leaf area in Ibadan soil.

Taxon
coffee seedlingsCoffeae3
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione3
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
stem diameter and leaf areae3
Direction
improvemente3
Setting
Ibadan soile3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–172 · show in text ↑
e3

“in Ibadan soil, mycorrhizal inoculation resulted in consistent and significant improvement on the stem diameter and leaf area of coffee seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP and SRP did not significantly change soil pH or organic carbon in either soil.

Taxon
coffee seedlingsCoffeae0
Treatment
application of phosphate fertilizer typese4
Outcome
Soil pH and Organic Carbone4
Direction
not significantly affectede4
Setting
both soilse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of coffee seedlings in two soil types in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–201 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil pH and Organic Carbon were not significantly affected by the application of phosphate fertilizer types in both soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP application with or without mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased soil available P in both soils.

Taxon
coffee seedlingsCoffeae0
Treatment
application of SSP with or without mycorrhizal inoculatione5
Outcome
soil available Pe5
Direction
enhancede5
Setting
the two soilse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of coffee seedlings in two soil types in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–201 · show in text ↑
e5

“the soil available P was significantly (P< 0.05) enhanced in the two soils due to application of SSP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation without P fertilizer gave significantly higher root colonization of coffee seedlings than SSP with inoculation in Mambilla soil.

Taxon
coffee seedlingsCoffeae6
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculation without P-fertilizer applicatione6
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
root colonizatione6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
SSP application and mycorrhizal inoculatione6
Setting
Mambilla soile6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–172 · show in text ↑
e6

“the root colonization of coffee seedlings at 6 MAT was significantly higher as a result of mycorrhizal inoculation without P-fertilizer application compared with root colonization under SSP application and mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation with or without P fertilizer did not significantly affect root colonization of coffee seedlings in Ibadan soil.

Taxon
coffee seedlingCoffeae7
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculation with or without Phosphate fertilizere7
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
the colonization of coffee seedling rootse7
Direction
did not significantly affecte7
Setting
Ibadan soile7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–172 · show in text ↑
e7

“The mycorrhizal inoculation with or without Phosphate fertilizer did not significantly affect the colonization of coffee seedling roots in Ibadan soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1849–1999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRP had a comparable effect to SSP on coffee seedling growth, especially under mycorrhizal inoculation.

Taxon
coffee seedlingsCoffeae7
Treatment
SRPe7
Outcome
growthe7
Direction
comparablee7
Qualifier
especially under mycorrhizal inoculatione7
Comparator
SSPe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“SRP had a comparable effect with SSP on the growth of coffee seedlings especially under mycorrhizal inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

SRP is a promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sources in coffee seedling production in Nigeria.

Taxon
coffee seedlingCoffeae7
Outcome
promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sourcese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“SRP is a promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sources for coffee seedling production in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2121–2224 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · disease · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · disease · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Coffea (coffee)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.