Abstract
A greenhouse study was carried out to evaluate the effect of phosphate fertilizer types and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings in two soil types in Nigeria. The trial was a factorial experiment involving two types of P-fertilizers (Single Super Phosphate and Sokoto Rock Phosphate) and mycorrhizal inoculation. The P-fertilizers were applied at 10kg P205/ha and a control (no-P fertilizer application) while the AMF was applied at two levels (with and without inoculation). The six treatments combinations were applied to two-month old coffee seedlings grown in the two soils (Ibadan and Mambilla). The experiments were laid out in a CRD with three replications and data on growth of coffee and soil parameters were taken for six months. In Mambilla soil, the height and stem diameter of coffee seedlings were significantly (P< 0.05) higher as a result of application of SSP and mycorrhizal inoculation compared with SRP and inoculation or the control. The number of leaves and leaf area were significantly (P< 0.05) improved due to application of SSP and SRP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil while in Ibadan soil, mycorrhizal inoculation resulted in consistent and significant improvement on the stem diameter and leaf area of coffee seedlings. Soil pH and Organic Carbon were not significantly affected by the application of phosphate fertilizer types in both soils. However, the soil available P was significantly (P< 0.05) enhanced in the two soils due to application of SSP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation. Similarly, the root colonization of coffee seedlings at 6 MAT was significantly higher as a result of mycorrhizal inoculation without P-fertilizer application compared with root colonization under SSP application and mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil. The mycorrhizal inoculation with or without Phosphate fertilizer did not significantly affect the colonization of coffee seedling roots in Ibadan soil. SRP had a comparable effect with SSP on the growth of coffee seedlings especially under mycorrhizal inoculation; hence, SRP is a promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sources for coffee seedling production in Nigeria.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
In Mambilla soil, SSP with mycorrhizal inoculation increased coffee seedling height and stem diameter compared with SRP with inoculation or the control.
- Treatment
- application of SSP and mycorrhizal inoculatione1
- Interactor
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- height and stem diametere1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- SRP and inoculation or the controle1
- Setting
- Mambilla soile1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”
e1“In Mambilla soil, the height and stem diameter of coffee seedlings were significantly (P< 0.05) higher as a result of application of SSP and mycorrhizal inoculation compared with SRP and inoculation or the control”
Claim · model-written summary
SSP and SRP application improved coffee leaf number and leaf area in Mambilla soil, with or without mycorrhizal inoculation.
- Treatment
- application of SSP and SRPe2
- Interactor
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of leaves and leaf areae2
- Direction
- improvede2
- Setting
- Mambilla soile2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”
e2“The number of leaves and leaf area were significantly (P< 0.05) improved due to application of SSP and SRP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly improved coffee stem diameter and leaf area in Ibadan soil.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione3
- Interactor
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- stem diameter and leaf areae3
- Direction
- improvemente3
- Setting
- Ibadan soile3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”
e3“in Ibadan soil, mycorrhizal inoculation resulted in consistent and significant improvement on the stem diameter and leaf area of coffee seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
SSP and SRP did not significantly change soil pH or organic carbon in either soil.
- Treatment
- application of phosphate fertilizer typese4
- Outcome
- Soil pH and Organic Carbone4
- Direction
- not significantly affectede4
- Setting
- both soilse4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of coffee seedlings in two soil types in Nigeria”
e4“Soil pH and Organic Carbon were not significantly affected by the application of phosphate fertilizer types in both soils”
Claim · model-written summary
SSP application with or without mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased soil available P in both soils.
- Treatment
- application of SSP with or without mycorrhizal inoculatione5
- Outcome
- soil available Pe5
- Direction
- enhancede5
- Setting
- the two soilse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of coffee seedlings in two soil types in Nigeria”
e5“the soil available P was significantly (P< 0.05) enhanced in the two soils due to application of SSP with or without mycorrhizal inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation without P fertilizer gave significantly higher root colonization of coffee seedlings than SSP with inoculation in Mambilla soil.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculation without P-fertilizer applicatione6
- Interactor
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- root colonizatione6
- Direction
- highere6
- Comparator
- SSP application and mycorrhizal inoculatione6
- Setting
- Mambilla soile6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”
e6“the root colonization of coffee seedlings at 6 MAT was significantly higher as a result of mycorrhizal inoculation without P-fertilizer application compared with root colonization under SSP application and mycorrhizal inoculation in Mambilla soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation with or without P fertilizer did not significantly affect root colonization of coffee seedlings in Ibadan soil.
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculation with or without Phosphate fertilizere7
- Interactor
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- the colonization of coffee seedling rootse7
- Direction
- did not significantly affecte7
- Setting
- Ibadan soile7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (AMF) on the growth of coffee seedlings”
e7“The mycorrhizal inoculation with or without Phosphate fertilizer did not significantly affect the colonization of coffee seedling roots in Ibadan soil”
Claim · model-written summary
SRP had a comparable effect to SSP on coffee seedling growth, especially under mycorrhizal inoculation.
- Treatment
- SRPe7
- Outcome
- growthe7
- Direction
- comparablee7
- Qualifier
- especially under mycorrhizal inoculatione7
- Comparator
- SSPe7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“SRP had a comparable effect with SSP on the growth of coffee seedlings especially under mycorrhizal inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
SRP is a promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sources in coffee seedling production in Nigeria.
- Outcome
- promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sourcese7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“SRP is a promising substitute for inorganic phosphate sources for coffee seedling production in Nigeria”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · disease · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- positive
fertilization · soil: chemistry · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · disease · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · disease · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · growth · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →inoculation · soil: chemistry · Coffea (coffee)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.