Paper · 2017 · Annals of tropical research/Annals of tropical research (Visayas State University-Online)

Determination of limiting nutrient to Sweetpotato (L.) growth on Samoa Oxisol using a Ipomoea batatas Nutrient Omission Technique

Taniela Siose; Mohammed Kader; Anabella Tulin

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the influence of various macro- and micronutrients on the growth and root yield of sweetpotato (variety IB/PH/03) grown in a Samoan Oxisol under semi-controlled screenhouse conditions. The following nutrient elements were considered: N, P, K, Mg, S, B, Cu, Fe, Mo, Mn, Ni, and Zn. The set-up involved pot nutrient omission trials wherein the twelve nutrient elements were combined to form an ALL treatment with subsequent 12 treatments made by excluding one nutrient consecutively from the ALL combinations. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications for all treatments while six for the ALL treatment. Results showed that P was the most limiting factor to sweetpotato vegetative growth and root yield. Reduced storage root yield in relation to ALL were also observed when N, P, K, S, B, Fe, Mn, Mo and Ni were not supplied, although the difference was insignificant. Thus unless P deficiency is addressed, the deficiency effects of these nutrients on storage root yield remain insignificant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus was the most limiting nutrient for sweetpotato vegetative growth.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
most limitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P was the most limiting factor to sweetpotato vegetative growth and root yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus was the most limiting nutrient for sweetpotato root yield.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
most limitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P was the most limiting factor to sweetpotato vegetative growth and root yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting N, P, K, S, B, Fe, Mn, Mo or Ni reduced storage-root yield relative to ALL, without a significant difference.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Material
IB/PH/03e1
Treatment
N, P, K, S, B, Fe, Mn, Mo and Ni were not suppliede0
Outcome
storage root yielde0
Direction
Reducede0
Comparator
ALLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced storage root yield in relation to ALL were also observed when N, P, K, S, B, Fe, Mn, Mo and Ni were not supplied, although the difference was insignificant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato (variety IB/PH/03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that other nutrient deficiency effects on storage-root yield remain insignificant until P deficiency is addressed.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Outcome
P deficiency is addressede0
Qualifier
deficiency effects of these nutrients on storage root yield remain insignificante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“unless P deficiency is addressed, the deficiency effects of these nutrients on storage root yield remain insignificant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato (variety IB/PH/03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Omitting Mo reduced shoot yield on Humult.

    Nutrient deficiencies limiting the growth of sweetpotato vines on important soil types in the highlands of Papua New Guinea · 2010 · compared with all nutrient control (ALL)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

See all 2 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nickel atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

potassium · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.