Paper · 2010

Nutrient deficiencies limiting the growth of sweetpotato vines on important soil types in the highlands of Papua New Guinea

I. T. Taraken; D. Kapal; William Sirabis; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Declining soil fertility is threatening the productivity of sweetpotato in the highlands of Papua New Guinea (PNG). A survey of sweetpotato gardens (SMCN/2005/043) identified K, S and P deficiencies as the main nutritional limitations on tuber production in the region. A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate how sweetpotato vines, propagated on three important soil types (Humult, Aquept and Aqoll), are affected by sequentially omitting 13 nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Bo, Zn, Mn, Cu, Mo, Ni) from fertiliser applications. On the Humult, only the minus Mo treatment produced significantly less shoot yield than the all nutrient control (ALL), but symptoms of S deficiency were also present in plants on the minus S treatment. On the Aquept, the minus N, P, Ca, S, B and Mn treatments had significantly less shoot yields than the control, but the minus S and N treatments were lowest yielding, and the S deficiency being clearly manifest. On the Aqoll, the minus N, P, S, Mn, Zn, Mo and Ni treatments had significantly lower shoot yields than the control, and again the minus S treatment produced the lowest yield. On all three soils, vine yields in the minus K treatments were not significantly less than those in the ALL, even though the concentrations of K in soil were very low (0.02 meq/100g). It was concluded that the early stage of vine propagation is probably less K-demanding than the tuber production stage in mature crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting Mo reduced shoot yield on Humult.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
minus Mo treatmente0
Outcome
shoot yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
all nutrient control (ALL)e0
Setting
Humulte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Humult, only the minus Mo treatment produced significantly less shoot yield than the all nutrient control (ALL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S deficiency symptoms occurred on Humult when S was omitted.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
minus S treatmente0
Outcome
symptoms of S deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“symptoms of S deficiency were also present in plants on the minus S treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting N, P, Ca, S, B or Mn reduced sweetpotato shoot yield on Aquept.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
minus N, P, Ca, S, B and Mn treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot yieldse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
Aquepte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Aquept, the minus N, P, Ca, S, B and Mn treatments had significantly less shoot yields than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting S and N gave the lowest yields on Aquept.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
minus S and N treatmentse0
Outcome
lowest yieldinge0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
Aquepte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Aquept, the minus N, P, Ca, S, B and Mn treatments had significantly less shoot yields than the control, but the minus S and N treatments were lowest yielding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S deficiency was clearly manifest on Aquept.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
S deficiencye0
Setting
Aquepte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Aquept, the minus N, P, Ca, S, B and Mn treatments had significantly less shoot yields than the control, but the minus S and N treatments were lowest yielding, and the S deficiency being clearly manifest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting N, P, S, Mn, Zn, Mo or Ni reduced shoot yield on Aqoll.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
minus N, P, S, Mn, Zn, Mo and Ni treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
Aqolle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Aqoll, the minus N, P, S, Mn, Zn, Mo and Ni treatments had significantly lower shoot yields than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting S produced the lowest yield on Aqoll.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
minus S treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
Aqolle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Aqoll, the minus N, P, S, Mn, Zn, Mo and Ni treatments had significantly lower shoot yields than the control, and again the minus S treatment produced the lowest yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K omission did not significantly reduce vine yield on any of three soils.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
minus K treatmentse0
Outcome
vine yieldse0
Direction
not significantly lesse0
Comparator
ALLe0
Setting
all three soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On all three soils, vine yields in the minus K treatments were not significantly less than those in the ALL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early vine propagation is probably less K-demanding than mature tuber production.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
K-demandinge0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
tuber production stage in mature cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the early stage of vine propagation is probably less K-demanding than the tuber production stage in mature crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nickel atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.