Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined sulphur, FYM and chitosan treatment significantly increased vine length, branch and leaf numbers, and shoot dry weight relative to no application in both seasons.

A claim from RESPONSE OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO SULPHUR, FARMYARD MANURE AND FOLIAR SPRAY WITH CHITOSAN 1. PLANT GROWTH AND PLANT CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined sulphur, FYM and chitosan treatment significantly increased vine length, branch and leaf numbers, and shoot dry weight relative to no application in both seasons.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sulphur application at 150 kg/fad., FYM at 4 ton/fad., and spraying sweet potato plants with chitosan at 150 ppme0
Outcome
vine length, both number of branches and leaves/plant, dry weight of shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse1
Comparator
without sulphur, without FYM and without chitosane1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the triple interaction among sulphur application at 150 kg/fad., FYM at 4 ton/fad., and spraying sweet potato plants with chitosan at 150 ppm, significantly increased vine length, both number of branches and leaves/plant, dry weight of shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–646
e1

“the lowest values of each of the above-mentioned traits were recorded with the interaction treatment among without sulphur, without FYM and without chitosan in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–922

Title

RESPONSE OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO SULPHUR, FARMYARD MANURE AND FOLIAR SPRAY WITH CHITOSAN 1. PLANT GROWTH AND PLANT CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS

Mansour, Fawzy Y.O. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 2017. doi:10.21608/zjar.2017.51331

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-efaaa6b1c5fb3efa7052d005cc4fe6ed46d7574e9e46b71d6e8c3483ab52d0d3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.