Paper · 2018 · Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research

Effect of Grafting Technique on Productivity and Quality of Cantaloupe under Saline Irrigation Water

SA Saleh

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The high salinity of the irrigation water is the biggest challenge facing horizontal expansion of vegetable cultivation especially in the new reclaimed land. The high salinity of the irrigation water is of a deleterious effect on the cantaloupe production. Thus, this experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions during 2015 and 2016 autumn seasons in Moshtohor, Kalyobiya Governorate, Egypt to investigate the possibility of using grafting technique to ameliorate the negative effects of high salinity of irrigation water on cantaloupe productivity and its quality. Two commercial cultivars "Ideal and Veleta" were used as scion while Cobalt and Strong-Tosa were used as rootstocks. A modified tongue approach grafting method was used, and then seedlings were exposed to four salinity levels [0.8 (non-saline control), 3.9, 7.1 and 10 dSm -1 ]. The results showed that all investigated factors "salinity levels, cultivars and rootstocks" significantly affected cantaloupe productivity and quality. Where, the medium salinity level (3.9dS/m) resulted in the highest early yield, fruits number and total yield compared to all other salinity levels while the total yield decreased by 39.7% with increasing salinity levels up to 10dS/m. Whereas, graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosa increased the total yield by 53.1, 85.5, 43.8 and 1.4% at different salinity levels: control, 3.9, 7 and 10dS/m, respectively compared to the nongrafted plants of Ideal at non-saline control. This percentage was 38.4, 41.5, 19.3 and decline 13.1% with Veleta/Cobalt compared to the non-grafted plants of Veleta at non-saline control. Generally, when cantaloupe plants have to be irrigated with high salinity of irrigation water, it is recommended to cultivate grafted seedling resulted of Veleta/Cobalt and Ideal/Strong-Tosa where these plants resulted the highest benefit and income compared with those on its own roots (non-grafted plants) under saline conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity, cultivar and rootstock significantly affected cantaloupe productivity and quality.

Treatment
salinity levels, cultivars and rootstockse0
Outcome
cantaloupe productivity and qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all investigated factors "salinity levels, cultivars and rootstocks" significantly affected cantaloupe productivity and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium salinity gave the highest early yield.

Treatment
medium salinity level (3.9dS/m)e0
Outcome
early yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other salinity levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the medium salinity level (3.9dS/m) resulted in the highest early yield, fruits number and total yield compared to all other salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium salinity gave the highest fruit number.

Treatment
medium salinity level (3.9dS/m)e0
Outcome
fruits numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other salinity levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the medium salinity level (3.9dS/m) resulted in the highest early yield, fruits number and total yield compared to all other salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium salinity gave the highest total yield.

Treatment
medium salinity level (3.9dS/m)e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other salinity levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the medium salinity level (3.9dS/m) resulted in the highest early yield, fruits number and total yield compared to all other salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield declined 39.7% at 10 dS/m salinity.

Treatment
10dS/me0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
39.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total yield decreased by 39.7% with increasing salinity levels up to 10dS/m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ideal/Strong-Tosa grafting raised total yield 53.1% at control salinity relative to nongrafted Ideal under nonsaline control.

Material
Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Treatment
graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.1e0
Qualifier
controle0
Comparator
nongrafted plants of Ideale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosa increased the total yield by 53.1, 85.5, 43.8 and 1.4% at different salinity levels: control, 3.9, 7 and 10dS/m, respectively compared to the nongrafted plants of Ideal at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ideal/Strong-Tosa grafting raised total yield 85.5% at 3.9 dS/m.

Material
Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Treatment
graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
85.5e0
Qualifier
3.9e0
Comparator
nongrafted plants of Ideale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosa increased the total yield by 53.1, 85.5, 43.8 and 1.4% at different salinity levels: control, 3.9, 7 and 10dS/m, respectively compared to the nongrafted plants of Ideal at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ideal/Strong-Tosa grafting raised total yield 43.8% at 7 dS/m.

Material
Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Treatment
graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.8e0
Qualifier
7e0
Comparator
nongrafted plants of Ideale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosa increased the total yield by 53.1, 85.5, 43.8 and 1.4% at different salinity levels: control, 3.9, 7 and 10dS/m, respectively compared to the nongrafted plants of Ideal at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ideal/Strong-Tosa grafting raised total yield 1.4% at 10 dS/m.

Material
Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Treatment
graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.4%e0
Qualifier
10dS/me0
Comparator
nongrafted plants of Ideale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosa increased the total yield by 53.1, 85.5, 43.8 and 1.4% at different salinity levels: control, 3.9, 7 and 10dS/m, respectively compared to the nongrafted plants of Ideal at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Veleta/Cobalt raised yield 38.4% at control salinity.

Material
Veleta/Cobalte0
Treatment
Veleta/Cobalte0
Outcome
percentagee0
Value
38.4e0
Comparator
non-grafted plants of Veletae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This percentage was 38.4, 41.5, 19.3 and decline 13.1% with Veleta/Cobalt compared to the non-grafted plants of Veleta at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Veleta/Cobalt raised yield 41.5% at 3.9 dS/m.

Material
Veleta/Cobalte0
Treatment
Veleta/Cobalte0
Outcome
percentagee0
Value
41.5e0
Comparator
non-grafted plants of Veletae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This percentage was 38.4, 41.5, 19.3 and decline 13.1% with Veleta/Cobalt compared to the non-grafted plants of Veleta at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Veleta/Cobalt raised yield 19.3% at 7 dS/m.

Material
Veleta/Cobalte0
Treatment
Veleta/Cobalte0
Outcome
percentagee0
Value
19.3e0
Comparator
non-grafted plants of Veletae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This percentage was 38.4, 41.5, 19.3 and decline 13.1% with Veleta/Cobalt compared to the non-grafted plants of Veleta at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Veleta/Cobalt yield declined 13.1% at 10 dS/m.

Material
Veleta/Cobalte0
Treatment
Veleta/Cobalte0
Outcome
percentagee0
Direction
declinee0
Value
13.1%e0
Comparator
non-grafted plants of Veletae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This percentage was 38.4, 41.5, 19.3 and decline 13.1% with Veleta/Cobalt compared to the non-grafted plants of Veleta at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Veleta/Cobalt and Ideal/Strong-Tosa grafted plants under saline irrigation for benefit and income.

Outcome
cultivate grafted seedling resulted of Veleta/Cobalt and Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Qualifier
under saline conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended to cultivate grafted seedling resulted of Veleta/Cobalt and Ideal/Strong-Tosa where these plants resulted the highest benefit and income compared with those on its own roots (non-grafted plants) under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1958 · show in text ↑
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.