Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ideal/Strong-Tosa grafting raised total yield 53.1% at control salinity relative to nongrafted Ideal under nonsaline control.

A claim from Effect of Grafting Technique on Productivity and Quality of Cantaloupe under Saline Irrigation Water · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ideal/Strong-Tosa grafting raised total yield 53.1% at control salinity relative to nongrafted Ideal under nonsaline control.

Material
Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Treatment
graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosae0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.1e0
Qualifier
controle0
Comparator
nongrafted plants of Ideale0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“graft combination of Ideal/Strong-Tosa increased the total yield by 53.1, 85.5, 43.8 and 1.4% at different salinity levels: control, 3.9, 7 and 10dS/m, respectively compared to the nongrafted plants of Ideal at non-saline control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1483
t0

“cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 60–70

Title

Effect of Grafting Technique on Productivity and Quality of Cantaloupe under Saline Irrigation Water

SA Saleh Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research 2018. doi:10.32474/ciacr.2018.02.000128

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-d53ffb2cfe42a91d194852324211f6ffe6d7dbce75cbb9da492d44cbe42a589b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.