Paper · 2018 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Pronitridine Nitrification Inhibitor With Urea Ammonium Nitrate for Corn

Kelly A. Nelson

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrification inhibitors have been used to enhance the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers. This research evaluated the effectiveness of nontreated urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) at 0, 67, 135, 202, and 270 kg N ha-1 as well as UAN treated with nitrification inhibitors (pronitridine at 9.4 and 18.8 L ha-1 or nitrapyrin at 0.5 kg a.i. ha-1) to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.). The study took place from 2012-2014 in upstate Missouri on a claypan soil. During the experiments, environmental conditions (high, medium, and low yielding years) affected corn response to pronitridine and nitrapyrin. In general, UAN plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 had similar effects on corn compared pronitridine at a higher (18.7 L ha-1) rate. During a high-yielding year (2014), in order to produce yields equivalent to 67 kg N ha-1 plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 or nitrapyrin, UAN needed to be increased 14 to 19%. Similarly, the amount of nontreated UAN needed to be increased 8 to 11% for yields to be equivalent to UAN at 135 kg N ha-1 plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 or nitrapyrin. Grain N removal and agronomic efficiency was highest with pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 and nitrapyrin combined with 67 and 135 kg N ha-1, respectively. This research indicates that pronitridine was as effective as nitrapyrin when added to a pre-emergence application of UAN placed between the rows in a dribble band.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN with 9.4 L/ha pronitridine had similar effects on corn as a higher pronitridine rate (18.7 L/ha).

Treatment
UAN plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1e1
Outcome
effects on corne1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
pronitridine at a higher (18.7 L ha-1) ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“In general, UAN plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 had similar effects on corn compared pronitridine at a higher (18.7 L ha-1) rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a high-yielding year (2014), nontreated UAN had to be increased 14 to 19% to match yields with pronitridine at 9.4 L/ha or nitrapyrin.

Treatment
pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 or nitrapyrine1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14 to 19%e1
Comparator
UANe1
Setting
high-yielding year (2014)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“During a high-yielding year (2014), in order to produce yields equivalent to 67 kg N ha-1 plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 or nitrapyrin, UAN needed to be increased 14 to 19%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nontreated UAN had to be increased 8 to 11% to match yields with UAN at 135 kg N/ha plus pronitridine or nitrapyrin.

Treatment
UAN at 135 kg N ha-1 plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 or nitrapyrine1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8 to 11%e1
Comparator
nontreated UANe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Similarly, the amount of nontreated UAN needed to be increased 8 to 11% for yields to be equivalent to UAN at 135 kg N ha-1 plus pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 or nitrapyrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine at 9.4 L/ha gave the highest grain N removal and agronomic efficiency when combined with 67 kg N/ha.

Treatment
pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1e1
Outcome
Grain N removal and agronomic efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
combined with 67 and 135 kg N ha-1, respectivelye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain N removal and agronomic efficiency was highest with pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 and nitrapyrin combined with 67 and 135 kg N ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin gave the highest grain N removal and agronomic efficiency when combined with 135 kg N/ha.

Treatment
nitrapyrine1
Outcome
Grain N removal and agronomic efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
combined with 67 and 135 kg N ha-1, respectivelye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain N removal and agronomic efficiency was highest with pronitridine at 9.4 L ha-1 and nitrapyrin combined with 67 and 135 kg N ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine was as effective as nitrapyrin when added to a pre-emergence UAN dribble-band application.

Treatment
pronitridinee1
Outcome
effectivee1
Direction
as effective ase1
Qualifier
pre-emergence application of UAN placed between the rows in a dribble bande1
Comparator
nitrapyrine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“This research indicates that pronitridine was as effective as nitrapyrin when added to a pre-emergence application of UAN placed between the rows in a dribble band”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental conditions (high, medium and low yielding years) affected corn response to pronitridine and nitrapyrin.

Outcome
corn response to pronitridine and nitrapyrine1
Qualifier
environmental conditions (high, medium, and low yielding years)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to enhance N uptake and increase yield of corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Environmental conditions (high, medium, and low yielding years) affected corn response to pronitridine and nitrapyrin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 499–616 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.