Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to find out the best pigeonpea based intercropping system and planting pattern along with optimum dose of nutrients to intercrops. Present study revealed that yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea were not adversely affected by different planting patterns and nutrient levels applied to intercrop during both the years. Pigeonpea planted at 50 × 25 cm with maize fodder as intercrop recorded highest pigeonpea equivalent yield of 1840 and 1895 kg/ha during 2015 and 2016, respectively. Application of 100% recommended dose of nutrient to intercrop also significantly increased the pigeonpea equivalent yield (1629 and 1732 kg/ha) over 50% of recommended dose and control during both years. Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize fodder fetched significantly higher net returns (Rs. 61191 and 68764/ha), B: C (1.7 and 2.0) and per day income (Rs. 453 and 509/ha/day) than other intercropping systems during both the years. Higher net returns (Rs. 50694 and 59568/ha) were recorded with 100% recommended dose of nutrient applied to intercrops as compared to net return with 50% of recommended dose (Rs. 43752 and 53344/ha) and control (Rs. 39163 and 46535/ha) during both the years. B: C and per day income were also recorded maximum with 100% of nutrients applied to intercrops during both the years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Planting patterns and intercrop nutrient levels did not adversely affect pigeonpea yield attributes or yield in either year.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- different planting patterns and nutrient levelse0
- Outcome
- yield attributes and yield of pigeonpeae0
- Direction
- not adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea were not adversely affected by different planting patterns and nutrient levels applied to intercrop during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea at 50 × 25 cm with maize fodder gave the highest equivalent yield, 1840 and 1895 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 50 × 25 cm with maize fodder as intercrope0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1840 and 1895 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- during 2015 and 2016e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea planted at 50 × 25 cm with maize fodder as intercrop recorded highest pigeonpea equivalent yield of 1840 and 1895 kg/ha during 2015 and 2016”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The full recommended intercrop nutrient dose increased equivalent yield over half dose and control in both years.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 100% recommended dose of nutrient to intercrope0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 1629 and 1732 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- 50% of recommended dose and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% recommended dose of nutrient to intercrop also significantly increased the pigeonpea equivalent yield (1629 and 1732 kg/ha) over 50% of recommended dose and control during both years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea with maize fodder yielded higher net returns in both years than other intercropping systems.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize foddere0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 61191 and 68764/hae0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize fodder fetched significantly higher net returns (Rs. 61191 and 68764/ha), B: C (1.7 and 2.0) and per day income (Rs. 453 and 509/ha/day) than other intercropping systems during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea with maize fodder had higher benefit cost ratio than other systems.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize foddere0
- Outcome
- B: Ce0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.7 and 2.0e0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize fodder fetched significantly higher net returns (Rs. 61191 and 68764/ha), B: C (1.7 and 2.0) and per day income (Rs. 453 and 509/ha/day) than other intercropping systems during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea with maize fodder gave higher daily income than other systems.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize foddere0
- Outcome
- per day incomee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 453 and 509/ha/daye0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize fodder fetched significantly higher net returns (Rs. 61191 and 68764/ha), B: C (1.7 and 2.0) and per day income (Rs. 453 and 509/ha/day) than other intercropping systems during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full intercrop nutrient dose gave higher net returns than half dose and control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 100% recommended dose of nutrient applied to intercropse0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- Rs. 50694 and 59568/hae0
- Qualifier
- control (Rs. 39163 and 46535/ha)e0
- Comparator
- 50% of recommended dosee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher net returns (Rs. 50694 and 59568/ha) were recorded with 100% recommended dose of nutrient applied to intercrops as compared to net return with 50% of recommended dose (Rs. 43752 and 53344/ha) and control (Rs. 39163 and 46535/ha) during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio was maximal with full intercrop nutrient dose.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 100% of nutrients applied to intercropse0
- Outcome
- B: Ce0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B: C and per day income were also recorded maximum with 100% of nutrients applied to intercrops during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Daily income was maximal with full intercrop nutrient dose.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 100% of nutrients applied to intercropse0
- Outcome
- per day incomee0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B: C and per day income were also recorded maximum with 100% of nutrients applied to intercrops during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.