Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea with maize fodder had higher benefit cost ratio than other systems.
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize foddere0
- Outcome
- B: Ce0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.7 and 2.0e0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize fodder fetched significantly higher net returns (Rs. 61191 and 68764/ha), B: C (1.7 and 2.0) and per day income (Rs. 453 and 509/ha/day) than other intercropping systems during both the years”
t0“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”
Title
Fatehjeet Singh Sekhon; Thakar Singh; K. S. Saini Legume Research - An International Journal 2018. doi:10.18805/lr-3910
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Planting patterns and intercrop nutrient levels did not adversely affect pigeonpea yield attributes or yield in either year.
- Intervention effect Pigeonpea at 50 × 25 cm with maize fodder gave the highest equivalent yield, 1840 and 1895 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016.
- Intervention effect The full recommended intercrop nutrient dose increased equivalent yield over half dose and control in both years.
- Intervention effect Pigeonpea with maize fodder yielded higher net returns in both years than other intercropping systems.
- Intervention effect Pigeonpea with maize fodder gave higher daily income than other systems.
- Intervention effect Full intercrop nutrient dose gave higher net returns than half dose and control.
- Intervention effect Benefit cost ratio was maximal with full intercrop nutrient dose.
- Intervention effect Daily income was maximal with full intercrop nutrient dose.