Paper · 2018 · Water

Influence of Straw Amendment on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Crop Yield on a Consecutive Mollisol Slope in Northeastern China

Shaoliang Zhang; Yao Wang; Qingsong Shen

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
27
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Straw amendment (SA) can be used to increase soil organic matter and decrease dioxide carbon emissions. However, the impact of SA on the crop yield is still subject to debate in different areas. In this study, soil temperature (ST), soil moisture (SM), soil bulk density, soil-available-nitrogen (AN), soil-available-phosphorus (AP), crop growth and yield were measured in SA and NSA (no straw amendment) at slope positions of a 130-m-long consecutive Mollisol slope during the maize (Zea mays) growth stages in the North Temperate Zone of China. Compared with NSA, the influence of SA on ST and SM was not consistent, while AN typically increased on the top slope. However, SA conventionally increased AP, increased daily ST and monthly ST (2.4–7.9%), and increased daily SM and monthly SM (2.1–12.5%) on the back slope. SA increased crop yield by 1–9.8% and 55.6–105.1% on the top and back slopes, respectively. At the bottom, SA conventionally decreased ST (0.20–1.48 °C in July and August), SM (3.5–29.6% from May to August), AN and AP, and decreased crop yield (4.1–30.6%). In conclusion, SA changed the equilibrium of ST and SM, influenced the dynamics of AN and AP on the consecutive slopes, and increased yield on both the top and back slopes but decreased yield at the bottom.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment increased available nitrogen at the top slope.

Treatment
SAe1
Outcome
ANe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NSAe1
Setting
top slopee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“AN typically increased on the top slope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with NSA, the influence of SA on ST and SM was not consistent, while AN typically increased on the top slope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment increased available phosphorus on the back slope.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
APe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
back slopee1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SA conventionally increased AP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the back slope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment raised daily and monthly soil temperature on the back slope by 2.4–7.9%.

Treatment
SAe1
Outcome
daily ST and monthly STe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.4–7.9%e0
Setting
back slopee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased daily ST and monthly ST (2.4–7.9%), and increased daily SM and monthly SM (2.1–12.5%) on the back slope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“SA conventionally increased AP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment raised daily and monthly soil moisture on the back slope by 2.1–12.5%.

Treatment
SAe1
Outcome
daily SM and monthly SMe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.1–12.5%e0
Setting
back slopee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased daily SM and monthly SM (2.1–12.5%) on the back slope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“SA conventionally increased AP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment increased maize yield by 1–9.8% on the top slope.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayse1
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1–9.8%e0
Setting
tope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA increased crop yield by 1–9.8% and 55.6–105.1% on the top and back slopes, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays) growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment increased maize yield by 55.6–105.1% on the back slope.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayse1
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55.6–105.1%e0
Setting
back slopese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA increased crop yield by 1–9.8% and 55.6–105.1% on the top and back slopes, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays) growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment lowered bottom-slope soil temperature by 0.20–1.48 °C in July and August.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
STe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.20–1.48 °Ce0
Qualifier
July and Auguste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SA conventionally decreased ST (0.20–1.48 °C in July and August)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment lowered bottom-slope soil moisture by 3.5–29.6% from May to August.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
SMe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.5–29.6%e0
Qualifier
from May to Auguste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SA conventionally decreased ST (0.20–1.48 °C in July and August), SM (3.5–29.6% from May to August)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment lowered available nitrogen and phosphorus at the bottom slope.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
AN and APe0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
bottome0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“At the bottom, SA conventionally decreased ST (0.20–1.48 °C in July and August), SM (3.5–29.6% from May to August), AN and AP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw amendment lowered maize yield at the bottom slope by 4.1–30.6%.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayse2
Treatment
SAe1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4.1–30.6%e0
Setting
bottome1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased crop yield (4.1–30.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the bottom, SA conventionally decreased ST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–959 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays) growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–508 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

44 papers: 42 positive, 2 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

salicylic acid · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.