Abstract
Effect of the bacterial inoculant Sil-All (short for ‘SA') on corn silage quality, digestibility and performance in dairy cattle was studied. SA treated silage resulted in the higher level of retained protein and slightly higher level of residual sugars in that treatment, the better digestibility of the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and the acid detergent fibre (ADF), the lower pH and evolution of ammonia compared to the control; The fall in pH was most rapid in the SA treated silage in the first 4 days of ensilage, when it matters most for the conservation of protein, compared with the control silage and this was linked more to both lactic and total acids. Both volatile fatty acid (VFA) and lactate content increased with ensiling time, increase degree reached up near 100%; Lactate content in treatment silage was higher than that in the control, and this difference was all maintained at the level of approximately 7％～13% almost in all cases, at length, up 16% in the case of day 15; pH value decreased with ensiling time. Moreover, pH value in most of treatment were lower than that in thecontrol; The digestibility of both dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) was appreciably improved by the use of inoculant SA. Also, in relation to reductions, of NDF and ADF were noted. An increase in milk yield of the order of 0.9kg per head per day in favour of SA was observed. Alternatively, with an average daily feed intake of 20kg, this indicates with 1ton of corn silage milk yield could be increased by 46.5kg.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Silage treated with the SA inoculant retained a higher level of protein than the control silage.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- SA treated silagee1
- Outcome
- retained proteine1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e1“SA treated silage resulted in the higher level of retained protein and slightly higher level of residual sugars in that treatment, the better digestibility of the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and the acid detergent fibre (ADF), the lower pH and evolution of ammonia compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
SA-treated silage had slightly higher residual sugars than the control silage.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- SA treated silagee1
- Outcome
- residual sugarse1
- Direction
- slightly highere1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e1“SA treated silage resulted in the higher level of retained protein and slightly higher level of residual sugars in that treatment, the better digestibility of the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and the acid detergent fibre (ADF), the lower pH and evolution of ammonia compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
SA-treated silage had better digestibility of neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre than the control silage.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- SA treated silagee1
- Outcome
- digestibility of the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and the acid detergent fibre (ADF)e1
- Direction
- bettere1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e1“SA treated silage resulted in the higher level of retained protein and slightly higher level of residual sugars in that treatment, the better digestibility of the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and the acid detergent fibre (ADF), the lower pH and evolution of ammonia compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
SA-treated silage had lower pH and ammonia evolution than the control silage.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- SA treated silagee1
- Outcome
- pH and evolution of ammoniae1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e1“SA treated silage resulted in the higher level of retained protein and slightly higher level of residual sugars in that treatment, the better digestibility of the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and the acid detergent fibre (ADF), the lower pH and evolution of ammonia compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The pH of SA-treated silage fell most rapidly during the first 4 days of ensilage, compared with the control silage.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- SA treated silagee2
- Outcome
- fall in pHe2
- Direction
- most rapide2
- Qualifier
- in the first 4 days of ensilagee2
- Comparator
- control silagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e2“The fall in pH was most rapid in the SA treated silage in the first 4 days of ensilage, when it matters most for the conservation of protein, compared with the control silage and this was linked more to both lactic and total acids”
Claim · model-written summary
The pH fall in silage was linked to lactic and total acids.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Compound
- lactic and total acidse2
- Outcome
- fall in pHe2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e2“The fall in pH was most rapid in the SA treated silage in the first 4 days of ensilage, when it matters most for the conservation of protein, compared with the control silage and this was linked more to both lactic and total acids”
Claim · model-written summary
Volatile fatty acid and lactate content of silage increased with ensiling time, by near 100%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- ensiling timee3
- Outcome
- volatile fatty acid (VFA) and lactate contente3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- near 100%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e3“Both volatile fatty acid (VFA) and lactate content increased with ensiling time, increase degree reached up near 100%”
Claim · model-written summary
Lactate content in SA-treated silage was higher than in the control, by approximately 7-13% in almost all cases.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- treatment silagee4
- Outcome
- Lactate contente4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 7％～13%e4
- Qualifier
- almost in all casese4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e4“Lactate content in treatment silage was higher than that in the control, and this difference was all maintained at the level of approximately 7％～13% almost in all cases, at length, up 16% in the case of day 15”
Claim · model-written summary
Lactate content in SA-treated silage was up 16% on the control at day 15.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- treatment silagee4
- Outcome
- Lactate contente4
- Direction
- upe4
- Value
- 16%e4
- Qualifier
- in the case of day 15e4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e4“Lactate content in treatment silage was higher than that in the control, and this difference was all maintained at the level of approximately 7％～13% almost in all cases, at length, up 16% in the case of day 15”
Claim · model-written summary
The pH value of silage decreased with ensiling time.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- ensiling timee5
- Outcome
- pH valuee5
- Direction
- decreasede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e5“pH value decreased with ensiling time. Moreover, pH value in most of treatment were lower than that in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The pH value of most inoculated silages was lower than in the control.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- treatmente5
- Outcome
- pH valuee5
- Direction
- lowere5
- Qualifier
- in most of treatmente5
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e5“pH value decreased with ensiling time. Moreover, pH value in most of treatment were lower than that in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The inoculant SA appreciably improved digestibility of dry matter and crude protein of corn silage.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculant SAe6
- Outcome
- digestibility of both dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP)e6
- Direction
- improvede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e6“The digestibility of both dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) was appreciably improved by the use of inoculant SA”
Claim · model-written summary
Reductions of NDF and ADF were noted in the corn silage.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- NDF and ADFe0
- Direction
- reductionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e0“Also, in relation to reductions, of NDF and ADF were noted”
Claim · model-written summary
SA inoculant increased milk yield of dairy cattle by 0.9 kg per head per day.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- SAe7
- Outcome
- milk yielde7
- Direction
- increasee7
- Value
- 0.9kg per head per daye7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“effect of the bacterial inoculant on corn silage quality”
e7“An increase in milk yield of the order of 0.9kg per head per day in favour of SA was observed”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →salicylic acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →salicylic acid · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
salicylic acid · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
salicylic acid · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →processing · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →processing · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →processing · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.