Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In vitro organic matter digestibility was lowest for corn silage, 55.35% of DM

A claim from Chemical composition, organic matter digestibility and energy content of apple pomace silage and its combination with corn plant, sugar beet pulp and pumpkin pulp · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro organic matter digestibility was lowest for corn silage, 55.35% of DM

Treatment
corn silagee5
Outcome
In vitro organic matter digestibilitye5
Direction
loweste5
Value
55.35% of DMe5
Comparator
all silagese5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple pomace silage ensiled with corn plant, sugar beet pulp, and pumpkin pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–155
e5

“In vitro organic matter digestibility of sugar beet pulp silage (74.41% of DM) was highest among all silages, whilst corn silage (55.35% of DM) had the lowest digestibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1390

Title

Chemical composition, organic matter digestibility and energy content of apple pomace silage and its combination with corn plant, sugar beet pulp and pumpkin pulp

I Ülger; M Kaliber; T Ayaşan; et al. South African Journal of Animal Science 2018. doi:10.4314/sajas.v48i3.10

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-c19b3aca039f4e3bfe372c71e9bbf5a6adad8194716df1859ab88759a07edba2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.